Take smoke signals for what they are and move on

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My summer romance is choking on the smoke!

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 06/08/2025 (394 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My summer romance is choking on the smoke!

Is this to be expected in our freakish fire situation, or are we just not suited to each other? I’m about ready to throw in the towel.

Here’s what happened. My new guy and I were falling in love quickly in June, so we rented a little cottage together for July and August, optimistically thinking the wildfire situation would clear up.

What a sad joke! We have rarely been able to stay at the lake more than two or three days running because of the smoke.

So, we gave up our cottage early, to another couple we know, for the rest of our August rental period. Hopefully they have stronger, healthier lungs than we do.

Smoke really kills the fun of a new romance, because you can’t go anywhere together. We were getting really sick of each other, to be truthful. He is a whiny pessimist, and I am always the cheerful optimist.

On days when it was so smoky it was questionable if we’d stay at the lake one more night, I’d say, “OK, let’s just close the windows tight and block around the doors, and stay inside and play board games tonight!” He’d scowl and get way too quiet. I knew he just wanted to jump in the car, and head back to the city.

Most couples don’t get “tested” so hard and so early in their relationship, but our reality is we’ve had one argument after another. Frankly, his scowling has gotten on my nerves more than the smoke!

Is this happening to everybody, or is it a personal difference between us that can never be resolved?

— Smoked Out, North Kildonan

Dear Smoked Out: Two optimists usually do well together. Oddly, two pessimists can also do well playing “Ain’t it awful” and complaining about everything.

But, optimists and pessimists, like you two, can get on each other’s nerves. The optimist tries to buoy both people up and feels crushed by the weight of the response of the pessimist — more sulking, more negativity.

You two opposites are actually lucky to experience the true other early on, and in an extreme situation. You get a forecast of what marriage might be like, when things get difficult. It doesn’t matter how many common activities you both enjoy in good times, it’s how you react in the hard times that will forecast how you do long-term.

Partnered with a strong and optimistic person like yourself, you could really fly! So, let go of this sad relationship and look to a better future with a happy, hopeful guy.

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: I lost my wife to cancer after a difficult battle. She’s “free” now and I try to comfort myself with that. But now I stand to lose my daughter, too.

She’s furious I’m dating the closest friend of my wife, and she’s hinting strongly that we must have been cheating behind her sick mother’s back to be a new couple so soon after her death.

Miss L., it was a long painful illness, and it hurt everybody watching it happen. By the time my wife died I was praying for the mercy of release, for her.

She even told me to start looking for a new wife, because I was such a loving man! What do I say to my upset daughter now? I can’t imagine telling her that!

— Painful Mess, Westwood

Dear Painful Mess: Both you and your wife’s best friend need to talk to your daughter privately, and that will take courage.

Be aware that you and your new mate cannot present as a duo to try to work this out with your daughter. Just the visual of you two standing together as a new couple would send her right up the wall.

You need to explain to your daughter — when you’re alone — how much you loved her mother and how much you will always miss her. Assure her this new situation was just a friendship while her mom — the great love of your life — was still alive. Your daughter needs to know there was never any competition between this woman and her mother.

But now, you and your wife’s friend are both alone, and finding some comfort in being together. Give your daughter the emotional space to reject this speech from you — for a time, at least — and sort it out over coming weeks.

In the meantime, continue with this woman friend, but don’t overtly act like a new romantic couple. Forget any public affection. In time, things will feel a lot less painful for everybody. Then one day, you can possibly think about marrying your late wife’s friend. Now is definitely not the time, no matter how lonely and sad you may feel.

Please send your questions and comments to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Maureen Scurfield

Maureen Scurfield
Advice columnist

Maureen Scurfield writes the Miss Lonelyhearts advice column.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Alex Jones ordered to pay $45.2M more over Sandy Hook lies

Jim Vertuno, The Associated Press 7 minute read Preview

Alex Jones ordered to pay $45.2M more over Sandy Hook lies

Jim Vertuno, The Associated Press 7 minute read Friday, Aug. 5, 2022

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A Texas jury on Friday ordered conspiracy theorist Alex Jones to pay $45.2 million in punitive damages to the parents of a child who was killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, adding to the $4.1 million he must pay for the suffering he put them through by claiming for years that the nation’s deadliest school shooting was a hoax.

The total — $49.3 million — is less than the $150 million sought by Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis, whose 6-year-old son Jesse Lewis was among the 20 children and six educators killed in the 2012 attack in Newtown, Connecticut. But the trial marks the first time Jones has been held financially liable for peddling lies about the massacre, claiming it was faked by the government to tighten gun laws.

Afterward, Lewis said that Jones — who wasn't in the courtroom to hear the verdict — has been held accountable. She said when she took the stand and looked Jones in the eye, she thought of her son, who was credited with saving lives by yelling “run” when the killer paused in his rampage.

“He stood up to the bully Adam Lanza and saved nine of his classmates’ lives," Lewis said. "I hope that I did that incredible courage justice when I was able to confront Alex Jones, who is also a bully. I hope that inspires other people to do the same.”

Read
Friday, Aug. 5, 2022

Explaining Canada’s superior employment rate

Wayne Simpson 5 minute read Preview

Explaining Canada’s superior employment rate

Wayne Simpson 5 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Donald Trump regularly makes outrageous claims. Fentanyl was pouring across the northern border from Canada and had to be stopped. Canada is nasty to deal with and has the highest tariffs in the world. Canada needs the U.S. but the U.S. doesn’t need Canada. Canadians want to become the 51st state. And so on.

In the latest trade dispute, after Mark Carney walked away from negotiations, Trump made a new claim that Canada’s unemployment rate was 10 per cent and climbing rapidly. Insofar as the unemployment rate is closely monitored, reported monthly, and given similar attention to the rates of inflation and economic growth, the comment was likely intended to signal Canada’s weakness. It fits Trump’s narrative that Canada needs the U.S. for its livelihood and protection and would be better off more directly under U.S. influence as a 51st state, or perhaps a protectorate like the Philippines or Panama in the past.

Fact checkers quickly reported that Canada’s unemployment rate is really 6.4 per cent for July, not 10 per cent, has fallen from 6.9 per cent in April, and is at its lowest rate since May 2024. Some astute observers pointed out that Canada’s method for the calculation of the unemployment rate leads to a higher rate than the U.S. by about one per cent. Under the American methodology, then, our unemployment rate would be 5.4 per cent, not that far off the U.S. July rate of 4.1 per cent.

Detection of unemployment is less straightforward that might appear, as it is sandwiched between the labour force statuses of employment and inactivity at a particular point in time. The internationally established standard for determination of unemployment is the notion of searching for work — you are unemployed if you do not have paid employment and you are looking for work without success. Surveys have been developed to categorize respondents as employed, unemployed or inactive, including the labour force survey (LFS) in Canada and the current population survey (CPS) in the U.S.

Read
2:00 AM CDT

Stastny gave $1,000 to convoy protesters

Jeff Hamilton 6 minute read Preview

Stastny gave $1,000 to convoy protesters

Jeff Hamilton 6 minute read Tuesday, Mar. 1, 2022

GLENDALE, Ari. – Paul Stastny said he donated to the convoy protests against COVID-19 vaccine mandates because of serious concerns he has for the future of those closest to him and what he believes could be a turning point for Canada.

The Winnipeg Jets forward was one of tens of thousands of people exposed in a leaked list of donors that financially supported the so-called “freedom convoy.” Stastny, under a registered company Walnuts, LLC, committed US$1,000 on Feb. 8, according to the leaked documents.

“Being the son of immigrants that left a communist country to come to Canada and have a future where they had their own decisions and do-what-they-want type of freedom is something that’s always been instilled in me,” Stastny told the Free Press, speaking for the first time on the topic. “And then I know what Canada was like, and I can see where Canada is going, and I think that’s what scares me.”

He added: “For me, it’s not about myself or my wife. It’s more about our kids’ futures, and you want their future to always be better than yours.”

Read
Tuesday, Mar. 1, 2022

What a difference a week makes

Mike McIntyre 6 minute read Preview

What a difference a week makes

Mike McIntyre 6 minute read Tuesday, Sep. 7, 2021

Take a week off, he thought. It's the dog days of summer, the sports world has slowed to a crawl and absolutely nothing of substance is going to happen, he figured.

Swing-and-a-miss on my part, with no shortage of newsworthy developments since we last spoke in this space. Now that I've powered up the laptop once again, let's quickly review the good, the bad and the downright silly that went down.

The NHL is heading back to the Olympics for the first time since 2014, and hockey fans around the world are the true winners. Good on the league, players' association and IIHF for finding a path to make this happen, even if Gary Bettman held his nose at the entire process. Shutting down the season for two weeks to send the best and brightest off to Beijing carries plenty of risk, in addition to the obvious inconvenience as the league tries to finally get back on a normal schedule after two COVID-19 shortened years. However, it's ultimately best for business.

On a local front, there should be no shortage of Winnipeg Jets suiting up for their countries. I'm looking forward to heading over to China in February to cover my first-ever Games for the paper, watching the likes of Mark Scheifele (Canada), Connor Hellebuyck and Kyle Connor (United States), Nikolaj Ehlers (Denmark) and Moose defenceman Leon Gawanke (Germany), who are all locks in my eyes. There could be others, too. Might Blake Wheeler (US), Neal Pionk (US), Ville Heinola (Finland) or Josh Morrissey (Canada) make a late bid? We shall see.

Read
Tuesday, Sep. 7, 2021

Conflict confusion of interest to Manitobans

Dan Lett 5 minute read Preview

Conflict confusion of interest to Manitobans

Dan Lett 5 minute read Monday, Mar. 1, 2021

Was Paul Beauregard guilty of a conflict of interest?

That is the question left hanging in the air following a remarkable week of disclosures, allegations and counter-allegations.

The Manitoba NDP claims Beauregard, former secretary to the Treasury Board, had improperly interceded in the awarding of a contract to his former employer, Bell MTS.

The party and MLA Adrien Sala devoted a considerable amount of time in 2020 pursuing such allegations against Beauregard who, in turn, filed a complaint against the official Opposition under the legislature's Respectful Workplace Policy.

Read
Monday, Mar. 1, 2021

Metaphor is dead as Trump ‘renovates’

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

Metaphor is dead as Trump ‘renovates’

Editorial 4 minute read Saturday, Oct. 25, 2025

It appears U.S. President Donald Trump will not stop until he has rendered literally every metaphorical description one could give for his presidency.

Case in point: he’s tearing the White House apart.

Trump, as part of a lifelong effort to make everything about himself, has torn down the entire East Wing of the presidential building as he moves ahead with construction of an ornate, US$350-million ballroom. The demolition was carried out without the approvals that are normally required. He already had the Rose Garden paved over, he evidently needs more change than that.

One could have made the argument during his first term that Trump had already rewritten American politics in his image, an image which persisted through others even during his four-year absence from the Oval Office during former president Joe Biden’s term. Republican policy revolves around his whims. Democrats were, and still are, defined by how hard they will work to oppose him. When he leaves the office one day, his spectre will likely endure, hovering over the American body politic for a generation.

Read
Saturday, Oct. 25, 2025