After rock shock, it really is time to take stock

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: Recently, I got down on bended knee and gave my girlfriend an engagement ring as a total surprise.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/02/2025 (550 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: Recently, I got down on bended knee and gave my girlfriend an engagement ring as a total surprise.

It was a beautiful diamond in a style I’ve seen her admire on other women’s fingers, so I knew she would love it.

She wore it for a week steady, but oddly, she didn’t show it around much — not even to her family and friends. Then she shocked me by saying that she wasn’t sure about getting married. She said it didn’t work the last time she tried it. She apologized and gave me the ring back.

What? I’m not a man who cries, but I was shocked and broke down bawling. Through my tears I told her that I thought she loved me and asked her if that was true.

Get this, she said, “Well, I just get carried away when we make love sometimes. I do care about you very much.”

Care about me? What utter crap. What do you think of her cheap definition of love?

— Disappointed and Done, River Heights

Dear Disappointed: She accepted the engagement ring — something she wasn’t totally sure about — as she was probably stunned and didn’t know what else to do.

As for her take on love, it’s possible to say a lot of things during the throes of passion that really shouldn’t taken as the final word on anything.

Being carried away during sex can bring a rush of feeling and bodily delight like fireworks throughout your body. That’s what you did for her, so at least you know you’re a talented lover.

It’s important to remember that loving someone passionately during great sex and being truly in love with a person — for whom you would go to the ends of the earth — is something else. This woman did not feel that for you.

While this rejection hurts badly and feels embarrassing, at least you won’t be stuck with a woman who didn’t truly love you.

The next time you’re getting emotionally and physically close with a woman, look for all the things you would want in an intimate partner in all aspects, not solely the fiery physical attraction and sexual compatibility.

Don’t give up on love and marriage just yet. You and a wonderful new partner will one day have the whole package — felt on both sides.

So before proffering any more diamonds, you need to take your time in relationships and talk about what kind of love you’re feeling, and decide together if you are a forever love match.

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: My husband wants to buy some land and build the cabin of his dreams this spring. He’s always wanted to do this, and I thought I loved the idea.

However, there’s a big problem, and it has nothing to do with money. In my dreams, I would want to build near people, while he wants his cottage more in the bush with perfect front-and-back clearings cut to get the morning and evening sun.

Last night we got into a serious discussion about it that ended up with me in tears. I really want to have neighbours all around for parties and company, and I picture us going out in our boat and visiting cabins all around a bay. A front window facing the water would be grand, but it could face in any direction.

My husband interrupted and said: “My dream cabin will be built facing south, in a quiet location. Who needs noisy neighbours partying all night?” We went to bed seriously upset.

Now I just want to rent a place for the summer like we always do, and forget his stupid “dream cabin.” He’s barely talking to me. What do you think?

— Cabin Clash, eastern Manitoba

Dear Cabin Clash: It’s a big mistake to deny the biggest dream of someone you love, especially if they have the money to realize it.

Lifelong dreams are not stupid, so give in cheerfully, but be sure to insist the amazing dream cabin is built with extra bedrooms and a little guest bunkhouse out back so you can sometimes have your friends and relatives out to have some fun. That way, you can both live your cottage dreams — even if they are sometimes on separate weekends.

Please send your questions and comments to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Maureen Scurfield

Maureen Scurfield
Advice columnist

Maureen Scurfield writes the Miss Lonelyhearts advice column.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Controversy sparked by APTN series First Contact

Niigaan Sinclair 5 minute read Preview

Controversy sparked by APTN series First Contact

Niigaan Sinclair 5 minute read Monday, Sep. 17, 2018

During the second episode of APTN’s three-episode documentary series First Contact, two distinct factions emerge about how to view Indigenous peoples.

This isn’t a spoiler by the way. This is Canada.

First Contact, for those who haven’t seen it, takes six Canadians with strong opinions about Indigenous peoples on a 28-day tour through Indigenous communities where their beliefs are challenged and contextualized.

Along their journey of education, they are fed and cared for by Indigenous communities, sleep in Indigenous homes, and hear brave stories by those who attended residential schools, lost loved ones, and struggle through poverty and substance abuse. Most episodes feature conversations with Indigenous peoples after participants toss out generalizations such as “reserves are dead-end places” and “Indians get everything for free.”

Read
Monday, Sep. 17, 2018

Sunshine Fund guarantees a little magic in the summer

Grace Penner 3 minute read Preview

Sunshine Fund guarantees a little magic in the summer

Grace Penner 3 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

To this day, I still remember the morning polar plunges into Moose Lake — a cold shock to the system meant to wake campers up before the sun hit its peak.

Throughout my youth, my siblings and I attended Camps with Meaning, an organization that at the time offered three Mennonite bible camps at Camp Moose Lake, Camp Koinonia, and Camp Assiniboina. I spent many summers at Camp Moose Lake as well as an annual weekend trip with my high school, Westgate Mennonite Collegiate.

I have fond memories of swimming in the lake, picking up a bow and arrow for archery practice, sitting in the cafeteria with all of my friends waiting to devour home-cooked meals, as well as camp-wide games of Manhunt where bouts of giggling echoed around the property.

My parents were able to send all three of us to camp, including my brothers Jonah and Samuel, due to the camp being subsidized by the Mennonite Church. Without the financial assistance, it would have been a strain on my family to support three children going to summer camp on a yearly basis.

Read
2:01 AM CDT

Residents fear mailbox crime sprees

Morgan Modjeski 4 minute read Preview

Residents fear mailbox crime sprees

Morgan Modjeski 4 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Some North End residents are concerned new community mailboxes will become a target for vandalism and crime after the base of one was recently lit ablaze — before it was even installed.

The community mailboxes started to show up on Andrews Street within the last two weeks. Some have been installed, while at other locations, only the concrete foundation is in place.

“They just dumped them on the boulevard,” said Stephen Giesbrecht, who lives beside one of the boxes in the St. John’s neighbourhood. “They dumped them on the corner and then they were gone.”

One of the concrete slabs has already played host to a fire and some of the hardware needed to install the mailbox melted.

Read
2:01 AM CDT

Subscribe

2 minute read Thursday, Jul. 23, 2026

City blames bad weather for creating new sinkhole on Sturgeon Creek path

Malak Abas 2 minute read Preview

City blames bad weather for creating new sinkhole on Sturgeon Creek path

Malak Abas 2 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 1:17 PM CDT

After a massive water-filled hole on a Sturgeon Creek active-transportation pathway took more than a year to fix, a new sinkhole has opened nearby.

In June 2023, the Free Press reported on a gaping depression stretching seven metres long, three metres wide and up to a metre deep that opened on a pathway leading to a playground on Amarynth Crescent near the Sturgeon Creek active-transportation route. The city finally made repairs in October 2024.

Now, about 12 metres away from that spot, a new crater has appeared.

The hole, about three metres long and 2.5 metres wide, has been blocked off using metal rods and plastic netting, but resident Philip Kaban said the opening is getting larger.

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 1:17 PM CDT

Bombers offence stalls in 22-19 loss to Elks

Joshua Frey-Sam 7 minute read Preview

Bombers offence stalls in 22-19 loss to Elks

Joshua Frey-Sam 7 minute read Updated: 8:19 AM CDT

It was a microcosm of the Winnipeg Blue Bombers’ season to this point: a first half that burned bright only to be dowsed in cold water.

The Bombers began the first leg of their mid-season gauntlet with a 22-19 loss to the Edmonton Elks at Commonwealth Stadium in the Alberta capital on Friday night.

Elks quarterback Cody Fajardo orchestrated an eight-play, 54-yard drive that set up a 40-yard game-winning field goal by Vincent Blanchard that snuck inside the left upright with zeros on the clock.

The drive, which was plagued by poor tackling by the Bombers defence, came after Bombers kicker Sergio Castillo tied the game at 19-19 on a 53-yard boot with 1:41 remaining in the contest.

Read
Updated: 8:19 AM CDT