Doggone low to drag pooch into breakup drama

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My girlfriend moved out and took my sweet boy — my dog — with her. I can live without that woman, but not without my old dog. I’ve raised him since he was a puppy.

Read this article for free:


By clicking the button above, an account will be created and you will begin to receive some of our recommended newsletters. You may opt out of any newsletter by visiting your Email and Communication Preferences page or by clicking "unsubscribe" at the bottom of any email.

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $1.44 a week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $5.77 plus GST every four weeks. After 52 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 24/09/2024 (765 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My girlfriend moved out and took my sweet boy — my dog — with her. I can live without that woman, but not without my old dog. I’ve raised him since he was a puppy.

She left me a nasty note, which I guess she thought would make me feel sorry and want her back. Ha.

She said she was living at her best friend’s house, so I drove over there. My dog was behind a little fence, but he still couldn’t get over it.

He came running towards me, crashing into the fence. It was raining and he was soaked but I pulled him over it and I took off home with him.

My ex phoned me while I was driving and threatened to involve the cops and her lawyer. I just laughed at her. She never cared the least about my dog — she didn’t even want to feed him when she was living at my place.

Now she says she won’t go to the authorities about my “dog snatching” if I let her see him every second week. What’s that all about? She doesn’t really want to see the dog, she just wants to see me again.

I told her she wouldn’t be getting any visitation privileges.

Then she started yelling that she was calling a lawyer. Will I really have to go to court over this? I can’t afford legal bills — plus, it’s my dog!

— Furious Dog Owner, Fort Rouge

Dear Furious: Not many lawyers would want to argue your ex-girlfriend’s case. Fido was yours from day one and lived with you at your home, from his puppy days until this girlfriend came for a while and left with him — without your permission.

It seems she wants to engage with you in any way possible — even a legal battle — and it’s going to result in a big bill. And for what? She’s no doubt going to lose. She might figure this out herself once she calms down.

So, wait a bit and see if she gives up. If not, invest in a lawyer — possibly one through legal aid (legalaid.mb.ca) — and get a warning letter written in “legalese” sent to her regarding who really owns that dog. That should be enough to settle the issue.

Then, if she calls you, just say in a strong and steady voice, “I’ve talked to my lawyer, and you’d best stay far away from my house and my dog. Don’t call again. Goodbye.”

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: My ex-wife was in Manitoba this summer for a vacation. On her way home to Ontario, she called me up and invited me for a drink. I went out of curiosity.

What a mistake.

She has never looked more beautiful. She had slimmed down and that must have been quite the expensive beauty treatment on her face.

We had a few drinks and lots of laughs. I started remembering why I used to be so in love with her in my 20s. We parted with a long kiss and I sadly went home to my third wife.

I looked at her bitter face when I got home and wondered why I didn’t try harder to make the marriage work with my first wife. She was the best of them all.

I guess it was the drinking that kept me from being a decent husband — and I’m still at it. I just need a few drinks after work. That has never really stopped for me. Does that make me a loser? I’m never violent.

Should I try to quit now? I think it’s probably too late.

— Feeling Like a Loser, St. James

Dear Feeling: Up to this point, it’s been too soon to quit for you. Now, you say it’s probably too late to quit drinking. That reveals your true love may still be the bar or the bottle.

For some people, their most comfortable environment is a favourite watering hole and they consider the group they know there as their real family.

Once they’ve had a few beers or cocktails, they start feeling freer, funnier and friendlier — and no one is critical about their drinking. They realize they don’t want to go home where they’ll be unpopular with their mate again. Besides, they would rather drink than eat dinner.

When they finally do go home, their defensive line is often something such as, “Leave me alone if you’re going to give me a hard time.”

Is this your situation, or maybe something similar? If it is, and one day you find you seriously want to quit, you can contact Alcoholics Anonymous (aamanitoba.org) for help.

Please send your questions and comments to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Maureen Scurfield

Maureen Scurfield
Advice columnist

Maureen Scurfield writes the Miss Lonelyhearts advice column.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Free trips unusual for charities: experts

Teresa Wright, The Canadian Press 6 minute read Preview

Free trips unusual for charities: experts

Teresa Wright, The Canadian Press 6 minute read Wednesday, Jul. 29, 2020

OTTAWA - In the wake of revelations that Finance Minister Bill Morneau and his family had overseas trips sponsored by the WE organization, experts in the charitable sector say covering a donor's travel costs is an unusual practice.

Morneau told the House of Commons finance committee last week he had freshly repaid WE Charity more than $41,000 in expenses for trips he and his family took to Kenya and Ecuador in 2017 to see and take part in some of its humanitarian work.

WE Charity said the trips were meant to be free and that covering expenses for potential sponsors is nothing out of the ordinary for its organization, or for the international development sector.

"From time to time, on a complimentary basis, WE Charity invites potential supporters to see the impact of its global projects," WE told The Canadian Press in a statement.

Read
Wednesday, Jul. 29, 2020

Adult education should be the foundation of the North

Jim Silver 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Major economic developments are, we are being told, coming to northern Manitoba, focusing on the port of Churchill and the railway system that leads to it, and the production and export via that port of various commodities. Many challenges, particularly environmental, lie along that path, and they deserve particularly serious consideration if any development is to proceed.

One aspect of northern development about which almost nothing has been said is: “Who will do the work in the north?”

For decades past and still today, great reliance has been placed on bringing skilled tradespeople and other skilled workers to northern Manitoba from the south. The result has been that not only has the bulk of corporate profits been drained south, but so too have wages. As a result, rates of poverty are higher and formal educational levels are lower in the north than elsewhere in Manitoba. This is obviously detrimental to the north and particularly to those who live in the north.

If northerners themselves are to benefit from economic development in the north by forming the skilled labour force that will be needed, then we will need more of those northerners to be educationally prepared to undertake training for skilled employment.

Wolseley perfumer given reprieve in dispute with city

Gabrielle Piché 3 minute read Preview

Wolseley perfumer given reprieve in dispute with city

Gabrielle Piché 3 minute read Yesterday at 7:02 PM CDT

A perfumer who sells fragrances from a store on the first floor of his home in Wolseley won’t have to close in mid-November after all.

Michael O’Malley says La Parfumerie can stay open while the municipal government processes a conditional use order, which he planned to submit Wednesday.

“If we have to go through city council again… I’ll need a lot of people from my community to show up,” O’Malley said. “I hate to have to keep doing this… I’m just incredibly grateful to the people of Winnipeg.”

He had feared he’d have to shutter the business, which he has operated in his 145 Evanson St. home for 27 years.

Read
Yesterday at 7:02 PM CDT

Winnipeg Comiccon to feature Terminator 2 villain, Stargate cast

Conrad Sweatman 6 minute read Preview

Winnipeg Comiccon to feature Terminator 2 villain, Stargate cast

Conrad Sweatman 6 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

You gotta ask the question.

In Robert Patrick’s five-decade career, the 67-year-old actor — who’s in town for this weekend’s Winnipeg Comiccon — has played a gambling addict (The Sopranos), a racist (Peacemaker), a terrorist (Die Hard 2), a bereaved father (The X Files) and dozens of other memorable American TV and film parts.

Sometimes weak, though more often, bold and intimidating characters — but, in any case, real men, with emotional ranges well beyond the robot he’s most famous for playing, namely Terminator 2: Judgment Day’s T-1000, a visual paradox of blob and blades whose only mission is to kill a teenage John Connor.

Still, the people want to know: what does Hollywood’s most iconic machine villain make of today’s AI boom?

Read
2:01 AM CDT

Director Schrader returns to silver screen with complex view of religion and belief

Alison Gillmor 4 minute read Preview

Director Schrader returns to silver screen with complex view of religion and belief

Alison Gillmor 4 minute read Thursday, Jun. 14, 2018

Bleak, wintry and rigorously controlled — until it’s not — this Book of Job-like drama from American filmmaker Paul Schrader looks at the challenges of faith.

The 71-year-old Schrader, known for scripting four Martin Scorsese films (including Taxi Driver and Raging Bull) and for directing his own (including American Gigolo, Affliction and Auto Focus), grew up in a strict Calvinist home — he famously did not see a film until he was 17 — and has always been drawn to stories of agonizing and uncertain redemption.

As the Rev. Toller (Ethan Hawke) wrestles with what it means to lead a righteous life in our badly broken world, his spiritual fate remains in doubt. It is certain, however, that First Reformed marks a cinematic rebirth for Schrader after recent disasters like The Canyons and Dog Eat Dog. Serious, complex and moving, this is not a perfect film, but even its flaws are powerful.

Toller is a solitary man who has come to the ministry late in life, after a family tragedy and a failed marriage. First Reformed, a historic church in upstate New York that was once a stop on the Underground Railroad, has since been reduced to an austerely beautiful tourist shop, more of a museum than a place of worship.

Read
Thursday, Jun. 14, 2018

Baffled by experience with ex who left

Maureen Scurfield 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My beautiful ex-wife used to travel with her girlfriends, and they were a wild and free group! I counted myself lucky to have tamed and married her. I should have woken up shortly after our wedding when she got restless, and then announced she did not want to have children!

It was a half-lie. She always wanted children. I know now she meant she didn’t want children with me. I was just a guy to mess around with.

So, she finally divorced me and married a new guy, and already has two kids. That hurts me so much! I loved her deeply and had always wanted kids with her, but I guess she didn’t have the same dream.

I ran into her recently at her best friend’s September wedding. She was looking sideways at me as I had a new younger girlfriend on my arm. I swear my ex was jealous! How could she be jealous when she could have had me for life, but dumped me?