It’s time to tune out the meddling naysayers

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: I hate my boss so much that I screamed obscenities at him, and he yelled back, “Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.”

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 16/09/2024 (718 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: I hate my boss so much that I screamed obscenities at him, and he yelled back, “Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.”

I had already quit anyway, so it didn’t matter what he said.

I was relieved, but still knew I’d have to pay my rent and I have no savings. That meant big trouble. I’m still friends with my recent ex-boyfriend, so I phoned him to explain what was happening.

What a nice guy he turned out to be. He said he wouldn’t give me money, but he would let me work for three months at his restaurant so I could get a regular cheque and keep my place while I looked for another job.

I was so grateful. Of course, I said yes to his offer.

We’ll never be back together as a couple, and that’s just fine. I love him as a platonic friend now. Anyway, he already has a nice new girlfriend, and she’s sweeter to him than I ever was.

I start my new job waitressing at his place this week. In my excitement, I told my mother about the situation and that my ex is giving me three whole months of work. She yelled, “You’ll be working for your ex-boyfriend? Have you lost your mind? You’ll probably get pregnant.”

You mean like she did, with me? She got pregnant by my dad — her older boss — way back when.

Then she said she hoped I wasn’t thinking about moving back in with her. I told her I wasn’t.

Her nasty comment cemented my decision to work hard for my ex until Christmas at least. I’m also aware there will be plenty of raised eyebrows and comments from other people.

Please tell me how should I handle them? My business is my business.

— Learning on My Own, St. Boniface

Dear Learning: If interfering people have the nerve to doubt your new work situation, don’t dignify them with an answer. Stare them down until their sly conversations come to a halt, then walk away casually like they mean nothing to you.

In the same vein, be sure to keep your conversations with your mom short for the time being. Here’s a harmless phone-call dismissal: “My ex and I were always meant to be just friends, and now we really are. I will do a good job working for him. Bye for now.” Click.

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: My girlfriend is out in the garden harvesting questionable health-potion ingredients like so many other gullible people who seem to be on this kick I’m reading about everywhere.

I don’t believe in these magical plant boosters and cures for our health that my mate is so high on. In fact, it creeps me out that she might be slipping them to me secretly in my food, particularly the weird ones to enhance sex.

I don’t know the names of her different plants, but she has warned me not to touch them in the garden — and just leave the preparation to her. I don’t trust that.

Today, I was home alone and read some bookmarked recipes in her newest cookbook, and it freaked me out. I don’t even want to taste her dishes now. What should I do?

— Nervous Guy, Charleswood

Dear Nervous: Go shopping without your girlfriend and start preparing healthy dinners with fresh ingredients that will tempt her. Tell her she can just put her feet up while you cook. She may just relax and stop pushing her own concoctions (although some of them may be really good if you give them a chance).

Also, play the gratitude card. Tell her she’s so good to you in so many other ways that she deserves to rest at the end of day. Make lots of healthy dinners and hopefully you can ride things out until the big freeze-up.

Please send your questions to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Maureen Scurfield

Maureen Scurfield
Advice columnist

Maureen Scurfield writes the Miss Lonelyhearts advice column.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Manitoba appeal court to review 27-year-old murder conviction

By Bruce Owen 5 minute read Preview

Manitoba appeal court to review 27-year-old murder conviction

By Bruce Owen 5 minute read Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2014

Frank Ostrowski took a giant step forward today towards to clearing his name of a 1987 murder conviction.

The 65-year-old Ostrowski appeared briefly in court in the first stage of an eventual hearing before the Manitoba Court of Appeal to review the tactics used by prosecutors to convict him of the drug-related slaying Robert Nieman Sept. 25 1986.

The hearing was ordered earlier today by federal Justice Minister Peter MacKay. By law, the federal justice minister has the authority to order a new trial or refer the matter to the court of appeal if a miscarriage of justice likely occurred.

“I am satisfied there is a reasonable basis to conclude that a miscarriage of justice likely occurred in Mr. Ostrowski’s 1987 conviction,” MacKay said in a statement.

Read
Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2014

St. Boniface culinary matriarch’s presence, devotion are much missed

Eva Wasney 6 minute read Preview

St. Boniface culinary matriarch’s presence, devotion are much missed

Eva Wasney 6 minute read Saturday, Oct. 1, 2022

Irène Kirouac’s smile was as iconic as her restaurants.

Read
Saturday, Oct. 1, 2022

Metaphor is dead as Trump ‘renovates’

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

Metaphor is dead as Trump ‘renovates’

Editorial 4 minute read Saturday, Oct. 25, 2025

It appears U.S. President Donald Trump will not stop until he has rendered literally every metaphorical description one could give for his presidency.

Case in point: he’s tearing the White House apart.

Trump, as part of a lifelong effort to make everything about himself, has torn down the entire East Wing of the presidential building as he moves ahead with construction of an ornate, US$350-million ballroom. The demolition was carried out without the approvals that are normally required. He already had the Rose Garden paved over, he evidently needs more change than that.

One could have made the argument during his first term that Trump had already rewritten American politics in his image, an image which persisted through others even during his four-year absence from the Oval Office during former president Joe Biden’s term. Republican policy revolves around his whims. Democrats were, and still are, defined by how hard they will work to oppose him. When he leaves the office one day, his spectre will likely endure, hovering over the American body politic for a generation.

Read
Saturday, Oct. 25, 2025

Murder of vulnerable stranger worth four years in prison, three years of supervision

Dean Pritchard 3 minute read Yesterday at 3:41 PM CDT

A Manitoba teen has been sentenced to seven years in custody and conditional supervision in the community for his part in a fatal, unprovoked attack on a stranger who was “in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

The now 18-year-old offender was one of three intoxicated teens who were “looking to get into a fight” when they crossed paths with the 21-year-old male who was walking in Swan River’s Legion Park, Nov. 1, 2024, and violently attacked him, provincial court Judge Geoffrey Bayly said in a recently released written decision.

The offender pleaded guilty to second-degree murder.

The victim, described as “highly intoxicated and vulnerable” at the time of the killing was not identified by name in the court decision or in media reports following the killing.

Conflict confusion of interest to Manitobans

Dan Lett 5 minute read Preview

Conflict confusion of interest to Manitobans

Dan Lett 5 minute read Monday, Mar. 1, 2021

Was Paul Beauregard guilty of a conflict of interest?

That is the question left hanging in the air following a remarkable week of disclosures, allegations and counter-allegations.

The Manitoba NDP claims Beauregard, former secretary to the Treasury Board, had improperly interceded in the awarding of a contract to his former employer, Bell MTS.

The party and MLA Adrien Sala devoted a considerable amount of time in 2020 pursuing such allegations against Beauregard who, in turn, filed a complaint against the official Opposition under the legislature's Respectful Workplace Policy.

Read
Monday, Mar. 1, 2021

Alex Jones ordered to pay $45.2M more over Sandy Hook lies

Jim Vertuno, The Associated Press 7 minute read Preview

Alex Jones ordered to pay $45.2M more over Sandy Hook lies

Jim Vertuno, The Associated Press 7 minute read Friday, Aug. 5, 2022

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A Texas jury on Friday ordered conspiracy theorist Alex Jones to pay $45.2 million in punitive damages to the parents of a child who was killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, adding to the $4.1 million he must pay for the suffering he put them through by claiming for years that the nation’s deadliest school shooting was a hoax.

The total — $49.3 million — is less than the $150 million sought by Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis, whose 6-year-old son Jesse Lewis was among the 20 children and six educators killed in the 2012 attack in Newtown, Connecticut. But the trial marks the first time Jones has been held financially liable for peddling lies about the massacre, claiming it was faked by the government to tighten gun laws.

Afterward, Lewis said that Jones — who wasn't in the courtroom to hear the verdict — has been held accountable. She said when she took the stand and looked Jones in the eye, she thought of her son, who was credited with saving lives by yelling “run” when the killer paused in his rampage.

“He stood up to the bully Adam Lanza and saved nine of his classmates’ lives," Lewis said. "I hope that I did that incredible courage justice when I was able to confront Alex Jones, who is also a bully. I hope that inspires other people to do the same.”

Read
Friday, Aug. 5, 2022