Plenty to unpack after snooping in mate’s suitcase

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My husband just came back from yet another suspicious trip to Toronto “on business.” He was in the bedroom unpacking, when his phone rang and there was “an emergency at his work.” He literally ran out the door, and jumped back into his car.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 24/08/2023 (1089 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My husband just came back from yet another suspicious trip to Toronto “on business.” He was in the bedroom unpacking, when his phone rang and there was “an emergency at his work.” He literally ran out the door, and jumped back into his car.

I’d been very curious why he’d been locking his suitcase on these trips back and forth to Toronto. When I saw it left open, I had to peek. Imagine my shock when I discovered extra-large black lace female lingerie, and a makeup bag. I am a tiny woman.

I threw it back into the suitcase, where I found it. Now I don’t know what to think or do. Either he’s having an affair with a large woman who would wear such clothes, or he’s cross-dressing when he’s out of town. I don’t know which is worse. My life, as I know it, may be over. What will I tell the children?

— Shocked Wife, Winnipeg

Dear Shocked: You can’t unsee what you saw. You’re going to have to talk to your husband about it. However, you should first think over the possible scenarios. Some men just get a kick out of wearing women’s underwear secretly and travelling would be a good time to do that. That’s not necessarily a marriage-breaker. But it’s also possible what you found has to do with outfits worn with another partner, male or female.

Ask him about this when there’s no one else in the house. Send the children to Grandma’s or a close friend’s, as they shouldn’t hear the upsetting conversation. Then, to make sense of things and figure out what you’re going to do, you and/or your husband might talk with a psychologist or an open-minded marriage counsellor.

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: I don’t feel it’s wise to tell people to leave their house if they’re unhappy in a marriage or if there has been infidelity. Tell them to talk to a lawyer before doing anything, unless they’re in real danger.

“Abandonment” of a partner can be bad. Married or not, if they cohabited, it has to be done right, or they might lose out in any settlement. Separation and divorce are expensive enough. Your option of leaving the home might be great after they speak to a lawyer, but not before. Sleep in another room or on the couch, but don’t leave until that is done.

Couples should also know they can form their own separation agreement, if they can divide things fairly, and they can have it set up before they go to their respective lawyers, as long as there are no kids involved. Templates can be found online. They just need their own lawyer to make it all legal.

— One Who Knows, Winnipeg

Dear One Who Knows: It’s better to see a lawyer before leaving a mate, except in the instances where women — and sometimes men — are being abused physically and emotionally. In those cases, they may not have the choice of sleeping in a room away from their abuser, and could be beaten up even more seriously.

In general, the extremely controlling spouse manages the couples’ money, and also controls where their mate goes, and in some cases, even who they talk to. Still, a secret phone call for legal advice would be better than nothing. Sadly for some people, fleeing to a friend or relative right away may be the safest thing they can do, as they can’t wait around until something really dire happens to them.

Please send your questions and comments to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Maureen Scurfield

Maureen Scurfield
Advice columnist

Maureen Scurfield writes the Miss Lonelyhearts advice column.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Opera group hits pub to stage shows for sophisticated palates

Conrad Sweatman 3 minute read Preview

Opera group hits pub to stage shows for sophisticated palates

Conrad Sweatman 3 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Opera’s famous drinking songs — La Traviata’s Brindisi, Don Giovanni’s Fin ch’han dal vino, Carmen’s Votre Toast — tend to flow with references to women and wine, not beer.

But that hasn’t stopped Winnipeggers from sipping 1919s or Generics at local bar and brewery Little Brown Jug over the past few years to the strains of Verdi, Puccini and Mozart.

Currently in its eighth season, Opera by the Pint has its next LBJ event Wednesday at 7 p.m. (The artists also perform at the Public Brewhouse and Gallery in Steinbach at 7 p.m. on Thursday.)

This week’s program focuses on musical hits, while also featuring traditional Filipino ballads and Mexican art songs.

Read
2:00 AM CDT

Restrictions to be further eased Friday

Larry Kusch 6 minute read Preview

Restrictions to be further eased Friday

Larry Kusch 6 minute read Tuesday, Feb. 9, 2021

Beginning Friday, Manitobans can once again dine in a restaurant, work out in a gym, get their nails done, worship together or play hockey outdoors — as long as pandemic protocols are followed.

The provincial government’s “cautious” easing of restrictions follows weeks of lower COVID-19 case counts and a steady drop in the number of coronavirus patients in hospitals and intensive-care units.

In announcing the changes Tuesday, along with chief provincial public health officer Dr. Brent Roussin, Premier Brian Pallister called it “a good day for Manitobans.”

The new provincewide public-health order, set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. Friday, is virtually identical to a proposal floated by the Progressive Conservative government last week. It is scheduled to be in place for three weeks.

Read
Tuesday, Feb. 9, 2021

Letters, Aug. 17

6 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Be statesmanlike, Pierre

Re: Canadians have moved on, Poilievre hasn’t (Aug. 7); Poilievre’s trade bluster a desperate bid for attention (Aug. 12)

If I were Pierre Poilievre, I wouldn’t be just thinking about becoming the next prime minister. I’d be thinking about legacy in larger terms — meaning how would I ultimately want to be remembered.

And I would want to be remembered as the politician who, even if not having achieved the ultimate goal of becoming prime minister, left the political world as a respected statesman. As such, with respect to trade and the relationship with the United States, I would be guided by the following maxim found in Tom Brodbeck’s Aug. 12 column: The goal should be to maximize Canada’s leverage while reducing its vulnerability.

MGEU resorts to arbitration for 12,000 civil servants

Dan Lett 6 minute read Preview

MGEU resorts to arbitration for 12,000 civil servants

Dan Lett 6 minute read Friday, Jul. 26, 2019

The Manitoba Government and General Employees’ Union filed for arbitration this week, alleging provincial negotiators have refused to make a definitive offer on wages or discuss any non-monetary issues.

Read
Friday, Jul. 26, 2019

Lasting legacy or pining for a pipe dream?

Laura Cameron 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

The federal government is investing in major infrastructure, promising to expedite “projects of national interest” and pitching them to private investors at a summit in September.

The Manitoba government has its sights set on a pipeline and LNG export terminal at Churchill. Instead, Manitoba should be putting forward feasible, future-facing infrastructure proposals that would leave a positive lasting legacy of energy affordability, independence and security for Manitobans.

A pipeline and LNG terminal at Churchill are not viable for several reasons — the technical challenges of building a pipeline over thawing permafrost; the prohibitive cost of ice-breaking tankers to move LNG through the Arctic; and a forecasted global oversupply of LNG and uncertain long-term export markets.

Given these challenges, a private company coming out of the woodwork to invest seems exceptionally unlikely. Private proponents are also not interested in building oil pipelines to the west, and Prime Minister Mark Carney has now made clear his priority to work with Premier Danielle Smith on a West Coast pipeline, which would cost upwards of $35 billion (on top of the over $34 billion in public funds already spent on the Trans Mountain pipeline). It would seem this pours more cold water on the idea of a third publicly funded pipeline to Hudson Bay.

Aide: Trump dismissed Jan. 6 threats, wanted to join crowd

Mary Clare Jalonick, Farnoush Amiri, Eric Tucker And Michael Balsamo, The Associated Press 7 minute read Preview

Aide: Trump dismissed Jan. 6 threats, wanted to join crowd

Mary Clare Jalonick, Farnoush Amiri, Eric Tucker And Michael Balsamo, The Associated Press 7 minute read Wednesday, Jun. 29, 2022

WASHINGTON (AP) — Donald Trump rebuffed his own security’s warnings about armed protesters in the Jan. 6 rally crowd and made desperate attempts to join his supporters as they marched to the Capitol, according to dramatic new testimony before the House committee investigating the 2021 insurrection.

Cassidy Hutchinson, a little-known former White House aide, described an angry, defiant president who was trying that day to let armed protesters avoid security screenings at a rally that morning to protest his 2020 election defeat and who later grabbed at the steering wheel of the presidential SUV when the Secret Service refused to let him go to the Capitol.

And when the events at the Capitol spiraled toward violence, with the crowd chanting to “Hang Mike Pence,” she testified Tuesday that Trump declined to intervene.

Trump “doesn’t think they’re doing anything wrong,” Hutchinson recalled hearing from her boss, White House chief of staff Mark Meadows.

Read
Wednesday, Jun. 29, 2022