Connecting with birth mother should be your call

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My mom who raised me is not my biological mother. My bio-mother is from my hometown in southern Manitoba. She was a young teenager who got pregnant but didn’t want a baby.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 22/09/2025 (380 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My mom who raised me is not my biological mother. My bio-mother is from my hometown in southern Manitoba. She was a young teenager who got pregnant but didn’t want a baby.

I’ve always known I was adopted and I’m so glad to have been raised by my adoptive parents who soon moved north with me because of my adoptive father’s work. Mom was unable to bear children, but she definitely married a great man!

My bio-mother never came looking for me — didn’t even send a letter or card. However, I do know her identity as I accessed my records through the provincial adoption office.

Now I’m a married guy myself, and to a wonderful woman who’s very sentimental. For some strange reason this year, she suddenly insists she wants to meet my biological mother “no matter what she’s like.”

I’ve told my wife I’ll gladly pay for the tickets and fly her and her sister (for company) down south.

But she wants me to be the one to go with her. I won’t go. I can’t stomach the drama.

My wife has some romantic notion that the meeting might bring my bio-mother and I together, and heal the rift. What rift? I’ve never known the woman. She was a teenage girl who got pregnant, had me at the hospital and gave me up for adoption, not a woman who has been pining for the lost baby she once knew.

What’s going on in my wife’s overly idealistic mind?

— Natal Nightmare, northern Manitoba

Dear Nightmare: Your wife may have some romantic notion of forgiveness all round, and may eventually also want to track down your bio-father, in case you have any questions about your genetic health history.

It’s time to explain to her there is no rift to heal for you, and meeting your bio-mother may actually be a bad experience for you. This woman has not been a mother to you, so don’t let yourself be pushed.

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: At a school reunion recently I ran into a man who was the love of my world from Grade 2 to Grade 7. When he first arrived at our school he had a mass of curly blonde hair and big green eyes. I was a little girl with long red hair.

I was infatuated by him from that first day all the way to Grade 7. Then we finally had a real “date” and when he walked me home he tried to French kiss me, but he didn’t even get a peck back from me. He didn’t ask me out again.

Then I saw him at our reunion this summer, standing up at the bar. We just stared — too dumbstruck to find any words. Finally, I ordered myself a very big drink, downed it and it loosened my tongue! I said boldly, “Hey, did you know you were the love of my life in grade school?” He laughed and said, “I wish I’d realized that. I thought you didn’t like me much.”

We stood there talking until his wife came and grabbed him for a slow dance. We stole looks at each other the rest of the weekend, but she kept him close beside her.

Then today — more than a month later on my birthday — I got an online card from “Guess who? Happy birthday!” and it had a little picture of the red-haired girl from the Peanuts comic strip. Why did he send this? What does it mean?

— Redhead, Norwood

Dear Redhead: It means this now-married grade-school-crush guy is outright flirting with you. He even went to the trouble to find that cartoon image to charm you. So, send him a card back saying, “Please feel free to get in touch with me again — when you’re actually single!”

Ponder this: How would you like getting involved with a guy like him who goes after other women while he’s in a relationship? His behaviour with you certainly seems to be proof of that.

Please send your questions and comments to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Maureen Scurfield

Maureen Scurfield
Advice columnist

Maureen Scurfield writes the Miss Lonelyhearts advice column.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Submit a news tip

1 minute read Monday, Mar. 16, 2026

Submit a news tip

Letters, Oct. 6

6 minute read Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

High road not so easy

Re: Khan should’ve taken high road: Goertzen (Oct. 3)

Politics is a tough game. Just ask former provincial Liberal leader Dougald Lamont. He got thrown under the bus by a prominent Manitoba/Canadian Liberal who advised people to vote NDP in the last provincial election.

As Lamont said when he lost the election, he is “human” and what happened to him “hurt.” Khan is also human. It is easy to criticize him for not taking the “high road.”

Danielle Da Silva

1 minute read Preview

Danielle Da Silva

1 minute read Sunday, Aug. 14, 2022

Danielle Da Silva is a general assignment reporter.

Read
Sunday, Aug. 14, 2022

Olympic soccer champion Christine Sinclair is golden in her hometown, too

Laura Armstrong - Staff Reporter, Toronto Star 3 minute read Preview

Olympic soccer champion Christine Sinclair is golden in her hometown, too

Laura Armstrong - Staff Reporter, Toronto Star 3 minute read Saturday, Aug. 7, 2021

Community centre that bears her name now also sports a rather large gold medal. As for ex-Jay José Bautista ... make that bronze.

Read
Saturday, Aug. 7, 2021

This week’s silly geopolitical spat

Gwynne Dyer 4 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

“I would not like to call this an incident. Let’s say it’s a diplomatic misunderstanding,” said Ukrainian Foreign Affairs Minister Andrii Sybiha. But the South Korean president definitely sees it as a serious incident, and he has already gone public with it.

“If (Ukraine’s) refusal to acknowledge the facts and issue a public apology continues, we will take additional measures,” President Lee Jae-myung wrote on X. He probably means cutting the non-military aid South Korea gives to Ukraine. (There is no military aid, since the constitution bans Seoul from providing arms to a country actively involved in a war).

What monstrous misdeed did the Ukrainian government commit to deserve such harsh words from a country that is generally sympathetic to Ukraine’s struggle against its giant neighbour? Have the South Koreans discovered Ukrainian spies in the Blue House?

No, it’s what we professionals call a “spat.”

Dealing now with increasing judicial dangers

Ben Wickstrom 5 minute read Tuesday, Sep. 29, 2026

For years, the Manitoba Association of Crown Attorneys (“MACA”) has been engaged in a dispute with the Manitoba government over the workload of its lawyers. That dispute is expected to come to a head at the end of November, when two weeks of grievance hearings are scheduled.

We remain hopeful that we can reach an agreement with our employer. But if we cannot, our union’s lawyers are prepared to make our case. As those hearings approach, we want to explain how we got here, what is at stake, and why this dispute matters beyond the working conditions of our members.

These problems are longstanding and predate the election of Manitoba’s current government. Our concern with the current government is not that it created these problems, but that it is now responsible for addressing them.

Despite the evidence before it, the government has not meaningfully addressed the workload concerns we have raised throughout its time in office.