Embrace variation as the spice of married life

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My wife and I can’t understand why so many people who love each other think it’s necessary they get along, have the same tastes and agree on everything.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 25/01/2024 (969 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My wife and I can’t understand why so many people who love each other think it’s necessary they get along, have the same tastes and agree on everything.

I can’t stand hearing couples say, “Yes dear, whatever you say, dear.” They aren’t even listening to each other. My wife and I do listen to each other. Then we laugh and say, “Well, there’s one more thing we don’t agree on.”

We don’t bother trying to work out mutual agreements anymore — it’s a waste of time. We are total opposites. For instance, we have different political views, so we always vote against each other. We also enjoy completely different kinds of holidays, vehicles, sports and music. I’m not crazy about her boring relatives and she looks askance at my crazy ones.

The only thing we do agree on is that we love each other. We also have the best sex, and sometimes we even have it in the middle of a fight that’s never going to be resolved in this lifetime. When it gets to the boiling point in those arguments, one of us just says, “Come here, you.”

We’re never going to agree on much in this life, but we’re fascinated by our differences. If she died, I wouldn’t lie down and die without her, but I would miss her terribly. Once I got past the mourning stage, I would like to think I’d go out and try to find another feisty character just like her.

— Embrace Differences, Windsor Park

Dear Embrace Differences: The “dynamic duo” type of relationship you two enjoy requires robust and healthy egos. It works best without kids or anyone else living under the same roof. Then you can argue and play-fight, tease each other and have sex whenever you want. You can also ignore each other and pursue your different interests.

Most couples don’t have that kind of freedom — and probably wouldn’t want it. They want agreement, which you would find boring.

Still, it might be good if more couples would encourage their mates’ differences. Sameness is comfortable, but the amiable friction you enjoy can ignite bigger sparks, especially if you argue in good fun.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: I’m 13 and came home from school recently because I was feeling sick. I called my mom and told her. When I got home and opened the door, I heard funny noises.

I went in and investigated. It turned out to be my older brother and his girlfriend on the living room rug doing something that they shouldn’t be. I ran back out and called my mom again to tell her why I couldn’t stay inside the house. She works four blocks away, so she got home fast. I waited outside while she went in — and there was a lot of shouting.

Now my brother is not talking to me at all, and it’s awful. I’m not exactly sorry though because I may have saved him from getting his girlfriend pregnant. What can I do? I care about him.

— Missing My Brother, South Winnipeg

Dear Missing Brother: You needed to go into the house because you were sick, plus it was freezing outside. Write your brother a message and tell him that. You can also tell him that while he may be angry with you, he was really taking chances having sex with his girlfriend like that, no matter what protection they were using.

Don’t expect a response right away, and don’t beg for his forgiveness. Your brother won’t be in any hurry to say thank you, but he will probably feel less anger towards you once he gets your note and thinks about it.

Please send your questions and comments to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Maureen Scurfield

Maureen Scurfield
Advice columnist

Maureen Scurfield writes the Miss Lonelyhearts advice column.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Near-future U.S. the setting for surreal dual-world storyline

Reviewed by Morley Walker 4 minute read Preview

Near-future U.S. the setting for surreal dual-world storyline

Reviewed by Morley Walker 4 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

It’s not every day you encounter a seriously intended literary novel that attempts to dramatize a mind-bending physics theory like quantum entanglement.

But then the B.C.-born-and-raised Emily St. John Mandel is not your everyday Canadian literary writer.

In her late 40s, she has lived in the U.S. for her entire writing career. She is best known for her 2014 dystopian novel Station Eleven, about a Shakespearean acting troupe navigating a pandemic-ravaged America.

Her new outing, her seventh, Exit Party, shares DNA with detective and sci-fi genres more than with conventional literary fiction.

Read
2:01 AM CDT

Give-and-take relationship of Roman leaders takes centre stage in Harris’s historical fiction

Reviewed by Kathryne Cardwell 4 minute read Preview

Give-and-take relationship of Roman leaders takes centre stage in Harris’s historical fiction

Reviewed by Kathryne Cardwell 4 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

British novelist Robert Harris’s latest work is a reflection on tyranny, corruption and betrayal among all-powerful political leaders.

You might be forgiven for thinking it’s a contemporary thriller — it’s actually historical fiction set in ancient Rome.

A former BBC journalist, Harris debuted as a novelist in 1992 with Fatherland, an alternative history where Nazi Germany won the Second World War.

Since then, the prolific author has become best-known for his works of historical fiction, especially his ancient Rome trilogy released from 2006-2015 and the novel Conclave, which was published in 2016 and was made into the film of the same name in 2024.

Read
2:01 AM CDT

Dynacare must treat workers fairly: health minister

Carol Sanders 3 minute read Preview

Dynacare must treat workers fairly: health minister

Carol Sanders 3 minute read Wednesday, Sep. 16, 2026

Manitoba’s health minister defended the government’s contract with Dynacare, saying the for-profit company is expected to treat its workers fairly — but wouldn’t say if that expectation was spelled out in the deal.

The 350 private lab workers, who are represented by the Manitoba Association of Health Care Professionals, have been without a contract since March 31 and went on strike on Sept. 8.

The Manitoba Labour Board ordered them back to work and they returned to the job one day later.

Health Minister Uzoma Asagwara was asked Wednesday about the lack of an essential services agreement and why the government didn’t intervene in March, knowing that a labour dispute could interrupt community lab services.

Read
Wednesday, Sep. 16, 2026

Chen tops Hanyu to win men's free skate at World Team Trophy

The Associated Press 3 minute read Preview

Chen tops Hanyu to win men's free skate at World Team Trophy

The Associated Press 3 minute read Friday, Apr. 16, 2021

OSAKA, Japan - Three-time world champion Nathan Chen won the free skate at the figure skating World Team Trophy on Friday to continue his dominance of two-time Olympic gold medallist Yuzuru Hanyu.

First after the short program, Chen opened with a quadruple flip and landed a quad salchow in the first half of his routine set to a selection of music by Philip Glass.

Winner of the past five U.S. titles, Chen landed two more quadruple toeloops as part of combination jumps to score 203.24 points.

Hanyu, who was second after the short program, opened with a quad loop but could only manage a single salchow instead of a planned quad salchow on his second jump. He added two quad toeloops later in his program and finished with 193.76 points.

Read
Friday, Apr. 16, 2021

Letters, Sept. 19

7 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Addicted to gambling

Re: Sweeney’s sexist U.S. gambling site ad not the real problem, Sept 17

Dan Lett’s analysis of the issue was very good. Something I would like to elaborate about the Canadian context is that provincial governments are not just betting on sports gaming to be big money, they’re actively encouraging problem gambling.

Take the Alberta-based ad in which a gambler is encouraged to spend their time gambling on their phone whenever there’s a break in the action at a baseball game. Every half-inning, every pitching change, should be spent gambling rather than being in the moment. The Ontario ads aren’t much better, just more subtle in how they normalize problematic gambling behaviour.

Media Literacy & Learning

0 minute read Tuesday, Oct. 28, 2025