Parental bond about far more than just blood

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My ex and I had a child via sperm donor, as I’m infertile genetically. I consider my child to be my own flesh and blood, as I was never going to have one naturally. But ever since my girlfriend broke up with me, she’s been acting more and more like our child isn’t truly mine — since biologically, he isn’t.

Read this article for free:


By clicking the button above, an account will be created and you will begin to receive some of our recommended newsletters. You may opt out of any newsletter by visiting your Email and Communication Preferences page or by clicking "unsubscribe" at the bottom of any email.

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $1.44 a week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $5.77 plus GST every four weeks. After 52 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 26/10/2024 (735 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My ex and I had a child via sperm donor, as I’m infertile genetically. I consider my child to be my own flesh and blood, as I was never going to have one naturally. But ever since my girlfriend broke up with me, she’s been acting more and more like our child isn’t truly mine — since biologically, he isn’t.

It’s extremely hurtful when she tries to make executive decisions about how to raise our boy, when we’re supposed to be co-parenting. If I complain, she gives me jabs about how she “carried the baby for nine long months” and it’s “her flesh and blood,” not mine.

She knows these comments wound me deeply, and she’s already tried to explain to my boy, who’s barely past being a toddler, that “only Mommy’s DNA” is in him.

My heart broke when I next had visiting time, and he asked me, “Are you my real daddy?” I had to try to explain to my own child why I really am his father. There’s no one else who would have been mean and selfish enough to bring that “real father” issue up to him other than his mother!

What can I even do? She and I are barely on speaking terms, and I know this is all being done for some kind of revenge, because I gave up a job I hated that earned me a lot of money. The pressure had been literally killing me and I was getting sick. She dumped me because of that. I feel worse now. This mess is becoming a heartbreaking situation.

— Feeling Terrible, Charleswood

Dear Feeling Terrible: You’re understandably fearing your ex’s endgame — that there’ll be no clear daddy in the picture for this little boy, until she meets a new guy she wants. Then he gets awarded the role.

She wants you feeling so hurt that you back out of the picture way before that. The way you feel, that will not be happening. There’s more than biology involved with your boy’s “real” parentage. There’s a deep love and a history of you going through the pregnancy with his mother, and then helping to parent him since the day he was born.

You agreed to the artificial insemination because you were infertile, but you have been the “real father” since he arrived, loving “your” boy and caring for him.

It’s time to see an experienced family lawyer, to find out what can be done to make sure you don’t lose contact with your boy.

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: I’ve been seeing a guy casually, and he’s clearly head-over-heels for me. I’m just not feeling the same way.

We’ve discussed numerous times that our relationship is just casual, and that we’ll both still be actively dating outside of it. However, he doesn’t date anyone else, and when we’re together he dotes on me, like he’s my husband! He’s a bit much, calling me darling and sweetheart all the time.

He is a sweet, attractive guy and my dogs really love him. By all accounts, he checks all the boxes, but I just don’t feel excited to be in a committed relationship with him, so I’m not going to be, and I won’t be pushed.

I like the casual relationship we (sort of) have now. I do wish I felt differently, but I know that isn’t going to change. Should I break things off or should I believe him when he says he’s fine with a casual friends-with-benefits type situation?

— Uncomfortable, North Kildonan

Dear Uncomfortable: You owe it to this sweet man who dotes on you to break it off and free him up, though it will hurt him badly at first. He’s the one who’s emotionally involved so he just can’t walk away on his own.

He needs you to be tough now, and set him free.

When he finally accepts the breakup and gets over the hurt, hopefully he’ll start looking for a mutually loving relationship. To make it easier for him, don’t offer him friendship as a consolation prize. He’d have a hard time turning that down, but he needs to get far away from you to heal.

Please send your questions and comments to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Maureen Scurfield

Maureen Scurfield
Advice columnist

Maureen Scurfield writes the Miss Lonelyhearts advice column.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Olympics Overnight: Canada reclaims gold in women’s hockey, Thompson wins silver in ski cross, and Kamila Valieva struggles in women’s free skate

Richie Assaly - Toronto Star, Toronto Star 8 minute read Preview

Olympics Overnight: Canada reclaims gold in women’s hockey, Thompson wins silver in ski cross, and Kamila Valieva struggles in women’s free skate

Richie Assaly - Toronto Star, Toronto Star 8 minute read Thursday, Feb. 17, 2022

Here’s what you missed overnight at Day 13 of the 2022 Beijing Olympics.

Read
Thursday, Feb. 17, 2022

Has the political wind changed?

Gwynne Dyer 5 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

It has been quite a week. First we had “Lula” – Luiz Inácio da Silva (as nobody but his mother ever called him) – defying everybody’s expectations. After winding up two million votes behind his challenger, Flávio Bolsonaro, in the first round of the Brazilian presidential election, he made a “miraculous” comeback in the second.

It was like a man going into a revolving door behind you and coming out in front. At the end of the first round, Lula was two million votes behind; at the end of the second round on Oct. 25 he was four million votes ahead. So how did he win a fourth term without cheating?

That’s what Bolsonaro claims he did, having fled to the United States; Trump, Flávio’s mentor, hints at the same. But Lula’s victory was not miraculous. He only learned to read when he was 10, and at 80 he still refused to have a mobile phone. His team finally made him get one and use it.

He wouldn’t do social media videos, so they created a WhatsApp channel called Lula’s Army, and made him appear on it at least daily. The channel went from zero to 10.8 million viewers in two weeks, and Lula won.

Police resuming drug-enforcement crackdown, working with outreach community

Chris Kitching 6 minute read Preview

Police resuming drug-enforcement crackdown, working with outreach community

Chris Kitching 6 minute read Thursday, Aug. 6, 2026

Winnipeg police are relaunching a drug enforcement campaign in some neighbourhoods Friday after they say a 10-day sweep led to more than 100 arrests and a drop in reported crime earlier this summer.

Police said the renewed initiative, targeting open drug use and trafficking, will continue into November with an outreach-first approach and a partnership with a coalition of community groups in response to criticism of the initial campaign.

“While there was a great deal of support for the enforcement actions we undertook to address public safety issues, there was also criticism about the lack of collaboration,” Winnipeg Police Service Chief Gene Bowers told reporters.

“At that time, I acknowledged that community organizations should have been part of our efforts. Hence, we’re here today.”

Read
Thursday, Aug. 6, 2026

Letters, Oct. 31

6 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Civic election a missed opportunity

The outcome of the latest municipal election in Winnipeg is nothing short of baffling. The decline of what was once a proud, beautiful prairie hub is impossible to ignore.

Winnipeg is rapidly sliding into a state of structural and social dilapidation, yet voters have inexplicably chosen to hand incumbent Mayor Scott Gillingham a second term. The decision smells of complacency, and sadly, it represents a massive missed opportunity for real urban renewal.

Walking through downtown Winnipeg today is an exercise in heartbreak. A city centre that should be a bustling economic and cultural core has instead transformed into an absolute eyesore. Encampments and tents are permitted to dot the heart of the city. Streets that used to thrive are now dominated by the tragic, visible reality of severe addiction, with individuals wandering and staggering through public spaces without adequate intervention or care.

Parental bond about far more than just blood

Maureen Scurfield 5 minute read Saturday, Oct. 26, 2024

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My ex and I had a child via sperm donor, as I’m infertile genetically. I consider my child to be my own flesh and blood, as I was never going to have one naturally. But ever since my girlfriend broke up with me, she’s been acting more and more like our child isn’t truly mine — since biologically, he isn’t.

It’s extremely hurtful when she tries to make executive decisions about how to raise our boy, when we’re supposed to be co-parenting. If I complain, she gives me jabs about how she “carried the baby for nine long months” and it’s “her flesh and blood,” not mine.

She knows these comments wound me deeply, and she’s already tried to explain to my boy, who’s barely past being a toddler, that “only Mommy’s DNA” is in him.

My heart broke when I next had visiting time, and he asked me, “Are you my real daddy?” I had to try to explain to my own child why I really am his father. There’s no one else who would have been mean and selfish enough to bring that “real father” issue up to him other than his mother!

Court ruling concludes Canadian Wheat Board saga

Laura Rance-Unger 4 minute read Preview

Court ruling concludes Canadian Wheat Board saga

Laura Rance-Unger 4 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

It remains to be seen whether the recent court ruling in a lawsuit filed after Canadian Wheat Board’s dissolution in 2012 puts the whole debate to rest, as some no doubt hope.

But either way, the dust has settled on the post-CWB world. The sun still rises and a new generation of farmers on the land only knows by name an institution that for generations influenced every aspect of Prairie grain farming.

The first Rural Revival column I wrote for this newspaper more than 30 years ago was about a thousand farmers from Western Canada demonstrating in support of the Wheat Board. It was in the aftermath of the Western Grain Marketing Panel report, one of several efforts that eventually included a plebiscite to help the federal government decide what to do about a vocal minority of farmers who wanted marketing “freedom.”

The polls at the time suggested about two-thirds of farmers were comfortable enough with the single-desk system for food wheat and barley to keep it around. It served as a counterbalance to canola, which they sold on the open market. They essentially had a dual market.

Read
2:01 AM CDT