Ex’s proximity won’t mean a thing with cool manner

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: Three weeks ago my husband and I moved into a great apartment block, the tall high-rise I always wanted to live in. I could never afford it, before I met him. We were overjoyed to be setting up our love nest in the sky, and were bringing up the final loads of stuff together, in two different elevators.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 08/06/2024 (841 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: Three weeks ago my husband and I moved into a great apartment block, the tall high-rise I always wanted to live in. I could never afford it, before I met him. We were overjoyed to be setting up our love nest in the sky, and were bringing up the final loads of stuff together, in two different elevators.

At the last moment, this guy shoved himself into my elevator, saying he was in a hurry. The voice was familiar. I turned around and I was shocked to see it was my ex-boyfriend, from six years ago. I said, in my coolest voice, “Imagine meeting you here. Just visiting?”

He said, “Nope, I live here and obviously you are moving in here, too — my bad luck, as usual!” Then he got off, on the floor right before mine. I was so upset! I want him to move the heck out of here.

As soon as I got in the door, I said to my husband. “You’ll never guess who lives here on the floor beneath us.” He said, “I know already — your ex — no big deal, sweetheart. It’s a big block.”

Then he added, “I saw him yesterday and didn’t think it was worth mentioning. Is it bothering you?”

My face turned beet-red. I said, “Well, what if your old ex was living in this block on the floor beneath us?” and he said. “I’m so over that woman, it wouldn’t matter a bit.” Then he gave me a long, serious look, and walked out of the room. Now I’m really upset!

How do I convince my husband — the real love of my life — I don’t have any important feelings left for my disgusting ex? I just can’t stand him, and looking at him ruins my day!

— Deeply Upset Newlywed, downtown Winnipeg

Dear Upset: Your upset over your ex seemed like a suspiciously alive emotional reaction to your husband. Don’t spoil another minute of your new happiness with him. Rather than acting nervous when you run into your ex in the elevator or car park, say a bland, “Hello, nice weather today.”

Don’t ask any questions to further the conversation, and be on your way. The person who does not need to hear about you practising this cool civility, is your new husband. He’s already heard more than enough on this topic.

If he does ask, just say, “I got over that little hiccup in a hurry,” and hopefully it will be true.

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: I’m a lesbian woman, in love with a bisexual, married woman. I have no business even talking to her, let alone touching her. I want her, and I can feel she’s interested in me.

We belong to the same charity and our eyes meet and stare deeply at different times when we’re doing a project. We always laugh at the same jokes. She sometimes winks at me, and finds little excuses to touch me.

Lately, I’ve been feeling it was only a matter of time. Then last week, she invited me to join her at her lake “sometime this month, before all the usual cottagers show up.” So, I’m going! My only problem is, what if I fall in love with her? I’m already half-way there. What if I’m just a fun experiment for her?

— Scared of My Feelings, North End

Dear Scared: If you can’t settle for a side-romance with this married woman, and you’re already feeling emotional about her, you could be headed for the deep end, without a life jacket.

You need to talk to this woman about her marital situation right now, on dry land. It may be her husband is OK with her having a casual girlfriend, or he might not have a clue it’s happening.

It’s also possible he has his own side romances, and sometimes they may share their adventures with each other. As a couple, they might ask you to join them for an experience like that. You would be the most vulnerable person in that situation, so be careful.

Please send your questions and comments to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Maureen Scurfield

Maureen Scurfield
Advice columnist

Maureen Scurfield writes the Miss Lonelyhearts advice column.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

The myth of seniors’ prices

Gregory Mason 4 minute read Tuesday, Apr. 21, 2026

Seniors do not need lower movie prices.

For the first time in almost seven years, I went to a movie in a cinema recently — Project Hail Mary, if you must know. When purchasing my ticket online, the menu offered a reduced senior price, a widespread practice in the retail and service industries. My mouse hovered over the price options as I debated whether to select the lower senior’s price I qualify for, or choose the regular fee, thereby registering my principled objection to this practice.

Hypothesis No. 1 is that Cineplex is genuinely concerned about the welfare of Canadian seniors and so offers us a price break. Call this the altruistic theory. However, while I appreciate the gesture, the seniors’ discount is irritating and wrong.

First, it is unenforced. Anyone can select the option with almost zero chance of detection. The bored teens who wave their electronic readers over my phone just want to hear the confirmation beep. Even if they were to glance up and try to align the price with my age, those under 20 are notoriously bad at estimating the age of anyone over 30.

Explaining Canada’s superior employment rate

Wayne Simpson 5 minute read Preview

Explaining Canada’s superior employment rate

Wayne Simpson 5 minute read Friday, Sep. 4, 2026

Donald Trump regularly makes outrageous claims. Fentanyl was pouring across the northern border from Canada and had to be stopped. Canada is nasty to deal with and has the highest tariffs in the world. Canada needs the U.S. but the U.S. doesn’t need Canada. Canadians want to become the 51st state. And so on.

In the latest trade dispute, after Mark Carney walked away from negotiations, Trump made a new claim that Canada’s unemployment rate was 10 per cent and climbing rapidly. Insofar as the unemployment rate is closely monitored, reported monthly, and given similar attention to the rates of inflation and economic growth, the comment was likely intended to signal Canada’s weakness. It fits Trump’s narrative that Canada needs the U.S. for its livelihood and protection and would be better off more directly under U.S. influence as a 51st state, or perhaps a protectorate like the Philippines or Panama in the past.

Fact checkers quickly reported that Canada’s unemployment rate is really 6.4 per cent for July, not 10 per cent, has fallen from 6.9 per cent in April, and is at its lowest rate since May 2024. Some astute observers pointed out that Canada’s method for the calculation of the unemployment rate leads to a higher rate than the U.S. by about one per cent. Under the American methodology, then, our unemployment rate would be 5.4 per cent, not that far off the U.S. July rate of 4.1 per cent.

Detection of unemployment is less straightforward that might appear, as it is sandwiched between the labour force statuses of employment and inactivity at a particular point in time. The internationally established standard for determination of unemployment is the notion of searching for work — you are unemployed if you do not have paid employment and you are looking for work without success. Surveys have been developed to categorize respondents as employed, unemployed or inactive, including the labour force survey (LFS) in Canada and the current population survey (CPS) in the U.S.

Read
Friday, Sep. 4, 2026

U.S politics remains irreconcilably divided

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

U.S politics remains irreconcilably divided

Editorial 4 minute read Thursday, Nov. 10, 2022

A great many residents of the United States hoped steadfastly that this week’s midterm elections would offer some clarity, some sense of resolution and perhaps even an encouraging sign regarding the direction ahead for America’s politics.

Read
Thursday, Nov. 10, 2022

Fact Check

1 minute read Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023

Fact Check

Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly |

The never-ending, continuing war in Ethiopia

Gwynne Dyer 5 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Another October coming up, and still the Nobel Peace Prize Committee refuses to give Donald Trump his prize. They even gave one to Barak Obama, who was Black and a Democrat and had only been in office for 20 minutes. Meanwhile, they ignore a man truly worthy of the prize, a man who ended eight wars last year alone. (He said so himself.)

Unfortunately the prize committee has a long record of backing the wrong person.

They gave it to Aung Sang Suu Kyi of Myanmar, who defended the Rohingya genocide: “I don’t think there is ethnic cleansing going on,” she said.

They gave it to former U.S. secretary of state Henry Kissinger, who ordered the secret carpet-bombing of Cambodia: “The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer.”

Perfecting profitability

Joel Schlesinger 6 minute read Preview

Perfecting profitability

Joel Schlesinger 6 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

More jaded of investors may roll their eyes at another book offering up a formula for the “perfect portfolio.”

Veteran portfolio manager Peter Lazaroff, based in St. Louis, and host of the Long Term Investor podcast understands the scepticism around his recently published book The Perfect Portfolio: a Proven Guide to Smart Investing for Long-Term Success.

Yet the chief investment officer at Plancorp Wealth Management, which has about US$10.2 billion in assets under management, has a caveat to the notion of the perfect portfolio.

“The perfect portfolio on paper is probably a lot different than the perfect portfolio for you in real life because what’s ‘perfect’ is a formula you can stick with for decades on end.”

Read
2:01 AM CDT