California budget won’t cover out-of-state abortion travel

Advertisement

Advertise with us

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — While Gov. Gavin Newsom has pledged to make California a sanctuary for women seeking abortions, his administration won't spend public money to help people from other states travel to California for the procedure.

Read this article for free:


By clicking the button above, an account will be created and you will begin to receive some of our recommended newsletters. You may opt out of any newsletter by visiting your Email and Communication Preferences page or by clicking "unsubscribe" at the bottom of any email.

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $1.44 a week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $5.77 plus GST every four weeks. After 52 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 28/06/2022 (1589 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — While Gov. Gavin Newsom has pledged to make California a sanctuary for women seeking abortions, his administration won’t spend public money to help people from other states travel to California for the procedure.

Newsom’s decision, included in a budget agreement reached over the weekend, surprised abortion advocates who have been working with the governor for nearly a year to prepare for a potential surge of patients from other states coming to California for abortions now that the U.S. Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade.

California’s operating budget, which is scheduled for a vote in the state Legislature on Wednesday, includes $20 million for an “Abortion Practical Support Fund” to pay for things like airfare, lodging, gas and meals for people seeking abortions in California. But the money can only be used to help people who already live in California, not people traveling from other states. The fund will accept private donations, but it’s unclear if that money can cover out-of-state travel expenses.

FILE — California Gov. Gavin Newsom displays a bill he signed that shields abortion providers and volunteers in California from civil judgements from out-of-state courts during a news conference in Sacramento, Calif., June 24, 2022. California lawmakers are expected to vote on the state budget on Wednesday, June 29, 2022, that includes $20 million to help pays for things like travel expenses, lodging and meals for people seeking abortions. But the money can only be used for in-state travel. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File)
FILE — California Gov. Gavin Newsom displays a bill he signed that shields abortion providers and volunteers in California from civil judgements from out-of-state courts during a news conference in Sacramento, Calif., June 24, 2022. California lawmakers are expected to vote on the state budget on Wednesday, June 29, 2022, that includes $20 million to help pays for things like travel expenses, lodging and meals for people seeking abortions. But the money can only be used for in-state travel. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File)

A spokesperson from Newsom’s office said the governor chose to focus on strengthening and expanding California’s existing abortion services. During a news conference on Friday, Newsom noted the budget contains tens of millions of dollars to support the state’s abortion clinics — funding he said could free up their budgets so they could use their own money to help women travel to California.

“We’re being realistic. You’re going to ask, ‘Are we going to pay for everyone’s travel and accommodations for 33 million people, of which 10% may seek care in California?’ Come on. We have to be realistic about what we can absorb,” Newsom said. “It’s not just the government providing and supporting. It’s all of us. It’s you, it’s me, it’s everyone contributing.”

California’s budget includes $40 million to cover abortions for women who can’t afford them, including women from other states who travel to California. But Jessica Pinckney, executive director of Access Reproductive Justice, a California nonprofit that helps women pay for the logistics of an abortion, said travel is often one of the biggest barriers women face in seeking reproductive care.

“Including out-of-state travel is absolutely necessary to reduce the barriers and burdens to those who are coming from hostile states,” she said.

Travel within California is important too, she said, because 40% of the state’s 58 counties don’t have abortion clinics, accounting for 3% of California’s female population. Many of them are low-income.

“There certainly is a benefit to having in-state travel financial support for Californians,” she said. “But the out-of-state piece really gets at the folks who are being impacted by the fall of Roe.”

While the state Legislature will likely approve the state budget on Wednesday, lawmakers can still make changes to it later. The current budget proposal allows the Abortion Practical Support Fund to also accept private donations. Democratic state Sen. Nancy Skinner’s office said they would try to clarify that at least the private money could be used to cover out-of-state travel expenses.

But Pinckney said she and other advocates will ask lawmakers for an amendment to let the public money also cover out-of-state travel expenses.

Pinckney’s nonprofit, Access Reproductive Justice, normally raises between $3,000 and $8,000 per month. Pinckney said they’ve raised about $100,000 in the five days since the Supreme Court ruling.

Still, they helped about 500 people last year. So far this year, their numbers have doubled each month compared to last year. Pinckney said she wouldn’t be surprised if they end up helping 2,000 people or more.

“We need public funding in order to encourage private funders to contribute,” she said.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Blockade halts rail traffic west of Winnipeg

Danielle Da Silva 6 minute read Preview

Blockade halts rail traffic west of Winnipeg

Danielle Da Silva 6 minute read Wednesday, Feb. 12, 2020

RM OF HEADINGLEY — It was a satisfying sight for Harrison Powder: a freight train stopped, hundreds of metres up the track from a blockade erected by a group of demonstrators.

Powder was among a group of 10 along a windswept country road, about 25 kilometres west of Winnipeg, protesting RCMP enforcement of a court-ordered injunction in northern British Columbia and the arrests of community leaders from Wet’suwet’en Nation.

A spokesman for CN Rail said train movements on the line stopped Wednesday because of the blockade.

“Canada should remember this, so should the RCMP and industry the next time they go invading Indigenous territory trying to force a pipeline through,” said Powder, a member of Bigstone Cree Nation in Alberta, and a Winnipeg resident. “They should remember what happened here with this incident, because it can happen again.”

Read
Wednesday, Feb. 12, 2020

Gilles, Poirier hope winding road leads to podium

Lori Ewing, The Canadian Press 7 minute read Preview

Gilles, Poirier hope winding road leads to podium

Lori Ewing, The Canadian Press 7 minute read Friday, Jan. 21, 2022

What deals should GM Kyle Dubas be looking for? Is the team tough enough?

Read
Friday, Jan. 21, 2022

Heart wants what it wants, but be considerate

Maureen Scurfield 4 minute read 2:01 AM EST

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: I’m a guy who’s always had one eye on the female sex — but a secret eye on guys, too. I am not turned on by my group of regular sports buddies — a great team of “players” in every sense of the word, but I do feel somewhat attracted to classical musicians who play music for the love of it, like I do.

I still have my girlfriend, but suddenly I have another interest — a brand-new guy I’ve started to see a little.

I don’t enjoy juggling the two relationships. It’s not a powerful feeling. I do feel guilty, and that I may hurt somebody badly, but I don’t want to lose either one of them. I actually care for both people. Maybe I’m just oversexed.

My best friend (also secretly bisexual) suggests I should, “Run them both ragged, and find out who can keep up.” Stupid joke, or not bad advice?

New artistic director ready to get to work at Sick + Twisted

Ben Waldman 5 minute read Preview

New artistic director ready to get to work at Sick + Twisted

Ben Waldman 5 minute read 2:01 AM EST

After a months-long national search for its next artistic director, Winnipeg’s Sick + Twisted Theatre has found who it’s been looking for in Mandy E. MacLean.

A Maritimer who studied theatre and performance at the University of New Brunswick and at Toronto’s Humber College, MacLean has served in recent years as the artistic and access producer for Toronto’s Crossroads Theatre — a low-barrier, youth-focused company — and as accessibility producer for Ontario’s renowned SummerWorks Festival.

MacLean, who arrived in Winnipeg last month, has long appreciated Sick + Twisted’s core philosophy, developed by former artistic director Debbie Patterson and a strong community of advisers and fellow artists. The company’s overarching goals include changing the way we think about disability in society and to create safe, supportive environments for artists to bring their “full selves” to the work.

MacLean, who was chosen by Sick + Twisted’s selection committee from a field of over 30 applicants, says the new position was intriguing, especially since she worked as an assistant director on the company’s 2025 production of Neither Here nor There, a personal, group-devised exploration of ability and difference that blended mythology, fantasy and reality.

Read
2:01 AM EST

City plans renos, repairs on underused, money-losing office tower next to police HQ

Joyanne Pursaga 4 minute read Preview

City plans renos, repairs on underused, money-losing office tower next to police HQ

Joyanne Pursaga 4 minute read 2:01 AM EST

The city is preparing to repair two floors of the mostly vacant office tower linked to the Winnipeg Police Service headquarters that has cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars more each year than it earns.

The plan is to renovate the second and third floors of the 11-storey former Canada Post tower at 266 Graham Ave, including some repairs needed to meet current building codes, notes a tendering document seeking a contractor to do the work.

In 2009, the city spent $29 million to buy the Canada Post warehouse and the tower, as part of the scandal-plagued police HQ project. Police now work out of the former warehouse and utilize some space in the tower.

The repair work will include interior demolition, asbestos abatement, several fire safety and smoke detection upgrades and some replacement of partitions, doors, hardware and ceilings. The winning bidder will also complete electrical, mechanical and lighting upgrades.

Read
2:01 AM EST

We don’t vote like our lives depend on it

Judy Waytiuk 5 minute read Preview

We don’t vote like our lives depend on it

Judy Waytiuk 5 minute read 2:00 AM EST

There’s an old saw — we get the government we deserve. It assumes active participation in our elections, full and fair media coverage from which voters can learn and a set of viable, capable candidates from which we can choose.

Arguably, those conditions did not apply this time around in Winnipeg. Our voter turnout was just 38 per cent and Mayor Scott Gillingham’s victory came from just 15 per cent of Winnipeg’s eligible voters. Two supposedly serious competitors embroiled themselves — by choice — in juvenile mudslinging and offered scattered, chaotic policy platforms.

A fourth contender surged from behind in the closing weeks of the campaign — and Noah Redden had spent most of the campaign being thought of as one of the pack of gadflies that emerge to run every time there’s a mayoralty campaign here. Yet he virtually tied Kevin Klein for second place. Had Redden been treated during the campaign as a viable candidate (he was the only one to publish online a detailed, thought-through policy platform), who knows what would have happened?

Absorb those facts.

Read
2:00 AM EST