Energy think tank accuses Conservatives of misusing their research in ad

Advertisement

Advertise with us

OTTAWA - A British Columbia think tank asked the Conservatives on Thursday to either stop running a new anti-carbon tax ad, or remove the reference in it to Clean Energy Canada's research.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 26/09/2019 (2561 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

OTTAWA – A British Columbia think tank asked the Conservatives on Thursday to either stop running a new anti-carbon tax ad, or remove the reference in it to Clean Energy Canada’s research.

Dan Woynillowicz, policy director for Clean Energy Canada, says Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer’s new ad misrepresents research done by the Simon Fraser University think tank.

“The information in the ad needs to be corrected, or it needs to be removed from circulation,” said Woynillowicz.

The ad launched earlier this week and claims that if Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau is re-elected Canadians will pay 31 cents more per litre of gas. In small print at the bottom of the ad, it says 22.5 cents of that comes from Canada Revenue Agency data on the impact of the carbon tax, while five cents is from Clean Energy Canada research on the clean fuel standard. The rest is GST.

The Canada Revenue Agency website says the carbon tax cost by 2022 will be 11 cents a litre. There is no existing plan to raise the tax beyond that year. The Liberals thus far have said only that they plan to review the price in 2022 to determine the next steps, though most experts agree carbon prices only work if they continually rise over time.

The Conservatives say their 22.5 cents estimate is because the Liberals have a secret plan to continue to hike fuel taxes to more than $100 a tonne.

Woynillowicz said the Clean Energy Canada study the Conservatives are citing is from 2017 and anticipates the impact by 2030 could be about five cents a litre. But Woynillowicz said it is misleading to look at that number in isolation from the rest of the report, which also points to places Canadians will save from greener technologies and parallel policies.

He said the analysis found while the clean fuel standard would cost the average Canadian household $5 a month in 2030, other policies, such as improved fuel-efficiency standards for vehicles, would mean household energy costs will be down $22 a month. For households that do more up front to reduce their energy use, savings could be as much as $82 a month, said Woynillowicz.

“It’s like criticizing somebody for eating one more chocolate bar a week, when at the same time they’ve started running marathons,” he said.

Woynillowicz said Clean Energy Canada is a program at a university and there is no problem with anyone citing or critiquing the research — as long as it is accurately represented in its full context. Not using the research properly is frustrating and harmful to democracy, he said.

“It’s a disservice to both policy making and politics and I think it is one of the reasons we see declining rates of trust in not only politicians but science as well,” he said.

Simon Jefferies, a spokesman for the Conservative campaign, said the party is sticking by the ad.

“If Justin Trudeau is re-elected his carbon tax is only going to continue to skyrocket – $2/litre gasoline will be right around the corner,” Jefferies said in an email.

Woynillowicz said a background document provided to The Canadian Press by the Conservatives to explain their numbers, is also wrong. In it, the Conservatives say the Clean Energy Canada report suggests the cost of the clean fuel standard could actually be more than 40 cents a litre by 2030.

In fact, said Woynillowicz, the study says the price of gasoline will rise 40 cents a litre by 2030 if the price of a barrel of oil goes back up to $90 or more. The clean fuel standard cost of five cents per litre by 2030 is unrelated and unaffected by the price of oil, said Woynillowicz.

Michael Bernstein, executive director of the group Clean Prosperity, is also taking issue with the ads carbon price numbers. He says the ad makes assumptions about the future of the carbon tax that are not yet mandated, and doesn’t mention the carbon tax rebates Ottawa is sending households to offset the increased costs.

Bernstein said even Ontario’s conservative Premier Doug Ford is putting stickers on gas pumps in his province that say the carbon price will be 11 cents a litre, not 22.5 cents.

Bernstein said the Conservative ad is “dishonest” and should be pulled off the air.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 26, 2019.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Plenty of losses all around

Gwynne Dyer 4 minute read Wednesday, Jul. 15, 2026

The last time oil-tankers were being shot up in the Persian Gulf, back in the 1980s, it was Saddam Hussein’s brutal tyranny in Iraq versus Ayatollah Khomeini’s revolutionary Islamist regime in Iran.

The United States backed Saddam because he was just another murderous thug, whereas the new regime in Tehran was an actual threat to American interests. It had overthrown Iran’s American-backed puppet king and wanted to spread its Islamist ideology across the region.

So, of course, Ronald Reagan’s administration chose Saddam’s side. It sent Iraq arms by clandestine means (because Congress wouldn’t authorize it) and even provided targeting information for Iraqi poison gas attacks on Iran. The Americans chose the “lesser evil,” but at least they knew it was evil.

Once in a while they would even say it out loud, quoting U.S. diplomat Henry Kissinger: “It’s a shame that both sides can’t lose.” But they never did anything about it, and after eight years of slaughter, the war ended in a no-score draw.

Port of Churchill signs agreement with Dutch port

Aaron Epp 2 minute read Preview

Port of Churchill signs agreement with Dutch port

Aaron Epp 2 minute read Yesterday at 4:40 PM CDT

Arctic Gateway Group, operator of the Port of Churchill, has signed an agreement with the Port of Rotterdam in the Netherlands to attract business and strengthen supply chains linking Western Canada and Europe.

The agreement enables the two ports to work together to develop new trade in critical minerals and energy products, connect Canadian producers with European buyers, and identify opportunities to improve the supply chain from Western Canadian resource projects through Churchill and into European markets.

The Port of Rotterdam is Europe’s largest port and home to more than 3,000 businesses across its industrial complex, serving as a major gateway for critical raw materials and energy.

Meanwhile, the Port of Churchill has been identified as a transformative national strategy for Canada and is emerging as a northern trade corridor connecting Western Canada’s resources to global markets.

Read
Yesterday at 4:40 PM CDT

Roughing it (less)

AV Kitching 6 minute read Preview

Roughing it (less)

AV Kitching 6 minute read Monday, Jul. 6, 2026

I hate camping.

I loathe the very idea of leaving the comfort and safety of home to sleep in a random field, where not only will I be exposed to the elements, but will also be at the mercy of all manner of creatures, from ursine to canine to insectan.

I do not want to hike up a hill just to share one outdoor tap with 12 others, standing alongside them as I brush my teeth.

I do not want to queue for 15 minutes, then part with a $2 coin to wedge myself into a shower stall just to stand under a piddly stream of lukewarm water while trying my best to swiftly soap up and sponge off lest I irk the rapidly growing line of campers outside.

Read
Monday, Jul. 6, 2026

Billions of dollars spent on health, but scattershot financial reporting leaves decision-makers, Manitobans in the dark, auditor general says

Nicole Buffie 3 minute read Preview

Billions of dollars spent on health, but scattershot financial reporting leaves decision-makers, Manitobans in the dark, auditor general says

Nicole Buffie 3 minute read Yesterday at 5:20 PM CDT

Manitoba’s auditor general says significant gaps in health-sector financial reporting make it difficult to understand how billions of dollars in public funds are spent.

Auditor General Tyson Shtykalo is calling for clearer, more transparent reporting in his latest report, titled Observations on Health Sector Financial Reporting and Accountability in Manitoba.

“Manitoba spends nearly $10 billion annually on health care, but current financial reporting does not provide a clear picture of how that money is spent, what services cost, or the financial pressures facing the system,” Shtykalo said in a news release.

While some financial information is available, the reports do not provide a “complete, consistent, or easily understood” picture of how health-care funds are spent, the report said.

Read
Yesterday at 5:20 PM CDT

Jets rookies look to make an impression in tournament

Mike McIntyre 1 minute read Preview

Jets rookies look to make an impression in tournament

Mike McIntyre 1 minute read Thursday, Sep. 5, 2019

His resumé certainly stands out amongst his peers. Now the challenge is for Kristian Vesalainen to make a similar impression on the ice.

Vesalainen, 20, is Winnipeg's most notable prospect to have travelled to Belleville, Ont., for the Rookie Showcase tournament. The Jets hopefuls will play three games against future Montreal Canadiens and Ottawa Senators beginning tonight, with additional games on Sunday and Monday.

“Great to be back. I’m excited to start a new season," Vesalainen, the 24th-overall pick in the 2017 NHL draft, said Thursday after his team skated at Bell MTS Iceplex prior to getting on a plane. “Just get a good feeling, playing with the guys. Just get touches on the ice and obviously show what I can do.”

There's no question Vesalainen has the tools, and there should be plenty of opportunity for him to translate that into a bigger role with the Jets this season. The big, skilled winger made the team out of camp last year, recording one assist in five games before being relegated to the press box as a healthy scratch, then sent to the Manitoba Moose of the AHL for further seasoning.

Read
Thursday, Sep. 5, 2019

Time to clean up a world of ‘slop’

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

Time to clean up a world of ‘slop’

Editorial 4 minute read Saturday, Dec. 20, 2025

Merriam-Webster chose its word of the year correctly, and for more reasons than it might realize.

“Slop” is the word of 2025, according to the dictionary publisher. The decision was motivated primarily by the public’s encounters with, and reaction to, content generated by “artificial intelligence” large-language models.

Despite the best efforts of the technology’s proponents, people are quickly getting tired of being inundated with gaudy, glossy, lazy AI-generated images and videos practically everywhere they turn, from social media platforms to T-shirt vendors.

According to a Pew Research Center survey of U.S. residents released in September, respondents were more concerned than excited by the technology, and were “generally pessimistic about AI’s effect on people’s ability to think creatively…”

Read
Saturday, Dec. 20, 2025