Energy think tank accuses Conservatives of misusing their research in ad

Advertisement

Advertise with us

OTTAWA - A British Columbia think tank asked the Conservatives on Thursday to either stop running a new anti-carbon tax ad, or remove the reference in it to Clean Energy Canada's research.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 26/09/2019 (2569 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

OTTAWA – A British Columbia think tank asked the Conservatives on Thursday to either stop running a new anti-carbon tax ad, or remove the reference in it to Clean Energy Canada’s research.

Dan Woynillowicz, policy director for Clean Energy Canada, says Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer’s new ad misrepresents research done by the Simon Fraser University think tank.

“The information in the ad needs to be corrected, or it needs to be removed from circulation,” said Woynillowicz.

The ad launched earlier this week and claims that if Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau is re-elected Canadians will pay 31 cents more per litre of gas. In small print at the bottom of the ad, it says 22.5 cents of that comes from Canada Revenue Agency data on the impact of the carbon tax, while five cents is from Clean Energy Canada research on the clean fuel standard. The rest is GST.

The Canada Revenue Agency website says the carbon tax cost by 2022 will be 11 cents a litre. There is no existing plan to raise the tax beyond that year. The Liberals thus far have said only that they plan to review the price in 2022 to determine the next steps, though most experts agree carbon prices only work if they continually rise over time.

The Conservatives say their 22.5 cents estimate is because the Liberals have a secret plan to continue to hike fuel taxes to more than $100 a tonne.

Woynillowicz said the Clean Energy Canada study the Conservatives are citing is from 2017 and anticipates the impact by 2030 could be about five cents a litre. But Woynillowicz said it is misleading to look at that number in isolation from the rest of the report, which also points to places Canadians will save from greener technologies and parallel policies.

He said the analysis found while the clean fuel standard would cost the average Canadian household $5 a month in 2030, other policies, such as improved fuel-efficiency standards for vehicles, would mean household energy costs will be down $22 a month. For households that do more up front to reduce their energy use, savings could be as much as $82 a month, said Woynillowicz.

“It’s like criticizing somebody for eating one more chocolate bar a week, when at the same time they’ve started running marathons,” he said.

Woynillowicz said Clean Energy Canada is a program at a university and there is no problem with anyone citing or critiquing the research — as long as it is accurately represented in its full context. Not using the research properly is frustrating and harmful to democracy, he said.

“It’s a disservice to both policy making and politics and I think it is one of the reasons we see declining rates of trust in not only politicians but science as well,” he said.

Simon Jefferies, a spokesman for the Conservative campaign, said the party is sticking by the ad.

“If Justin Trudeau is re-elected his carbon tax is only going to continue to skyrocket – $2/litre gasoline will be right around the corner,” Jefferies said in an email.

Woynillowicz said a background document provided to The Canadian Press by the Conservatives to explain their numbers, is also wrong. In it, the Conservatives say the Clean Energy Canada report suggests the cost of the clean fuel standard could actually be more than 40 cents a litre by 2030.

In fact, said Woynillowicz, the study says the price of gasoline will rise 40 cents a litre by 2030 if the price of a barrel of oil goes back up to $90 or more. The clean fuel standard cost of five cents per litre by 2030 is unrelated and unaffected by the price of oil, said Woynillowicz.

Michael Bernstein, executive director of the group Clean Prosperity, is also taking issue with the ads carbon price numbers. He says the ad makes assumptions about the future of the carbon tax that are not yet mandated, and doesn’t mention the carbon tax rebates Ottawa is sending households to offset the increased costs.

Bernstein said even Ontario’s conservative Premier Doug Ford is putting stickers on gas pumps in his province that say the carbon price will be 11 cents a litre, not 22.5 cents.

Bernstein said the Conservative ad is “dishonest” and should be pulled off the air.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 26, 2019.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Kids deserve better

Jordan Laidlaw 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

As much as I cling to hope, I recognize the ominous circumstances and questionable future that our young people stand to inherit.

Youth are navigating a world plagued with the existential dangers of climate change, artificial intelligence, political polarization and rising military armament, among other disconcerting trends. While schools cannot entirely ameliorate these issues, I am inspired by the words of Amina Mohammed, the United Nations deputy secretary-general, who declared teachers to be the “guardians of our future.”

Our future integrally depends on the learning, healthy development and empowerment of young people. With the upcoming Manitoba school board elections, I invite readers, voters and prospective candidates to consider how to support the practices of these guardians so we may ensure a brighter tomorrow.

First, I believe we are in — or entering — a community mental-health crisis. There is a resounding body of peer-reviewed research outlining the declining trends in the mental health of youth, parents and teachers. In May 2026, Doctors Manitoba stated its concern that the technology consumption habits of youth rivalled the health detriments of drinking and smoking. Many parents are stressed, economically struggling and need assistance. How might schools mitigate these precarious developments?

Energy think tank demands Tories remove ad

Mia Rabson, The Canadian Press 4 minute read Thursday, Sep. 26, 2019

OTTAWA - A British Columbia think tank asked the Conservatives on Thursday to either stop running a new anti-carbon tax ad, or remove the reference in it to Clean Energy Canada's research.

Dan Woynillowicz, policy director for Clean Energy Canada, says Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer's new ad misrepresents research done by the Simon Fraser University think tank.

"The information in the ad needs to be corrected, or it needs to be removed from circulation," said Woynillowicz.

The ad launched earlier this week and claims that if Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau is re-elected Canadians will pay 31 cents more per litre of gas. In small print at the bottom of the ad, it says 22.5 cents of that comes from Canada Revenue Agency data on the impact of the carbon tax, while five cents is from Clean Energy Canada research on the clean fuel standard. The rest is GST.

Youth centre library cancellation baffles

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

Youth centre library cancellation baffles

Editorial 4 minute read Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

It’s difficult to understand why Manitoba Corrections would shut down a library program that cost taxpayers nothing, was popular with young inmates and was designed to help them learn.

But that is what happened at the Manitoba Youth Centre, where a volunteer-run pop-up library has been cancelled by the province.

The Prison Libraries Committee, part of the Manitoba Library Association, provided the program at no cost to Corrections. Once a month, volunteer librarians brought books into the youth centre, helped young people find reading material, assisted with school research and provided something that can be in short supply in a correctional institution — positive interaction with people from outside its walls.

The program became so popular that the youth centre asked for it to be offered more frequently.

Read
Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

All sideshow, little substance

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

All sideshow, little substance

Editorial 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Well, there’s one thing that can be said about Winnipeg’s 2026 mayoral race that sets it apart from most previous campaigns for city council’s top position:

It isn’t boring.

In most civic elections, the power of incumbency and/or familiarity gives one mayoral candidate such a profound advantage that the outcome is all but a foregone conclusion and the lead-up to voting day becomes both uninteresting and largely irrelevant.

This year’s race, to the contrary, has been noteworthy for the unusual level of friction, controversy and mud-slinging that has been injected into the early part of the campaign.

Read
2:00 AM CDT

Letters, Oct. 7

6 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

On diet and humanity

Re: “Maybe ASI will need us” (Letters, Oct. 5)

Mr. Martin, humans eating animals is not part of the circle of life. Many cultures with abundant plant resources, or for religious beliefs, have historically subsisted on largely or strictly vegetarian diets. Likewise, in extreme environments such as the Arctic, Inuit rely heavily on animal products due to the near-absence of arable land. Humans adapt locally to their environments and do not have a single ancestral diet.

Clearly vegetarian or vegan diets are not fringe, as evidenced by plant-based products on main-stream grocery store shelves. To suggest the Free Press is morally endorsing a fringe diet is rubbish, (the newspaper) merely gives the public a platform for diverse opinions, thus generating individual, thought-provoking ideas and conversations — a practice that is desperately needed these days.

Michael Douglas comes to terms with fears, fame, father

Hillel Italie 6 minute read Preview

Michael Douglas comes to terms with fears, fame, father

Hillel Italie 6 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

NEW YORK — Michael Douglas, the award-winning actor and producer, recently turned 82. He is a cancer survivor, a recovered addict, a married man, the father and son of actors.

He is also an author, who begins his memoir with a message of thanks to his family — past and present and future — for the “sense of immortality.”

“Many times my father was asked, ‘Kirk, are you jealous of your son?’” he said during a recent interview at a Manhattan hotel, referring to his late father, fellow actor and sometime combatant Kirk Douglas.

“And he said, ‘Jealous?’ This is a sense of immortality, a continuity of generations.’”

Read
Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT