Energy think tank accuses Conservatives of misusing their research in ad

Advertisement

Advertise with us

OTTAWA - A British Columbia think tank asked the Conservatives on Thursday to either stop running a new anti-carbon tax ad, or remove the reference in it to Clean Energy Canada's research.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 26/09/2019 (2558 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

OTTAWA – A British Columbia think tank asked the Conservatives on Thursday to either stop running a new anti-carbon tax ad, or remove the reference in it to Clean Energy Canada’s research.

Dan Woynillowicz, policy director for Clean Energy Canada, says Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer’s new ad misrepresents research done by the Simon Fraser University think tank.

“The information in the ad needs to be corrected, or it needs to be removed from circulation,” said Woynillowicz.

The ad launched earlier this week and claims that if Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau is re-elected Canadians will pay 31 cents more per litre of gas. In small print at the bottom of the ad, it says 22.5 cents of that comes from Canada Revenue Agency data on the impact of the carbon tax, while five cents is from Clean Energy Canada research on the clean fuel standard. The rest is GST.

The Canada Revenue Agency website says the carbon tax cost by 2022 will be 11 cents a litre. There is no existing plan to raise the tax beyond that year. The Liberals thus far have said only that they plan to review the price in 2022 to determine the next steps, though most experts agree carbon prices only work if they continually rise over time.

The Conservatives say their 22.5 cents estimate is because the Liberals have a secret plan to continue to hike fuel taxes to more than $100 a tonne.

Woynillowicz said the Clean Energy Canada study the Conservatives are citing is from 2017 and anticipates the impact by 2030 could be about five cents a litre. But Woynillowicz said it is misleading to look at that number in isolation from the rest of the report, which also points to places Canadians will save from greener technologies and parallel policies.

He said the analysis found while the clean fuel standard would cost the average Canadian household $5 a month in 2030, other policies, such as improved fuel-efficiency standards for vehicles, would mean household energy costs will be down $22 a month. For households that do more up front to reduce their energy use, savings could be as much as $82 a month, said Woynillowicz.

“It’s like criticizing somebody for eating one more chocolate bar a week, when at the same time they’ve started running marathons,” he said.

Woynillowicz said Clean Energy Canada is a program at a university and there is no problem with anyone citing or critiquing the research — as long as it is accurately represented in its full context. Not using the research properly is frustrating and harmful to democracy, he said.

“It’s a disservice to both policy making and politics and I think it is one of the reasons we see declining rates of trust in not only politicians but science as well,” he said.

Simon Jefferies, a spokesman for the Conservative campaign, said the party is sticking by the ad.

“If Justin Trudeau is re-elected his carbon tax is only going to continue to skyrocket – $2/litre gasoline will be right around the corner,” Jefferies said in an email.

Woynillowicz said a background document provided to The Canadian Press by the Conservatives to explain their numbers, is also wrong. In it, the Conservatives say the Clean Energy Canada report suggests the cost of the clean fuel standard could actually be more than 40 cents a litre by 2030.

In fact, said Woynillowicz, the study says the price of gasoline will rise 40 cents a litre by 2030 if the price of a barrel of oil goes back up to $90 or more. The clean fuel standard cost of five cents per litre by 2030 is unrelated and unaffected by the price of oil, said Woynillowicz.

Michael Bernstein, executive director of the group Clean Prosperity, is also taking issue with the ads carbon price numbers. He says the ad makes assumptions about the future of the carbon tax that are not yet mandated, and doesn’t mention the carbon tax rebates Ottawa is sending households to offset the increased costs.

Bernstein said even Ontario’s conservative Premier Doug Ford is putting stickers on gas pumps in his province that say the carbon price will be 11 cents a litre, not 22.5 cents.

Bernstein said the Conservative ad is “dishonest” and should be pulled off the air.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 26, 2019.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Ex-CAO’s pay ‘adds insult to injury’

Carol Sanders 4 minute read Preview

Ex-CAO’s pay ‘adds insult to injury’

Carol Sanders 4 minute read Monday, Jul. 6, 2026

A Manitoba government deputy minister was paid by both the province and the city even though he left his civic position more than a year ago.

The city’s public disclosure compensation report revealed the extent to which two levels of taxpayers were on the hook for hundreds of thousands of dollars in salary payments to Michael Jack, who is Manitoba’s deputy minister of business, mining, trade and job creation and formerly the city’s chief administrative officer.

Jack resigned as city CAO on July 15, 2024 and was paid $410,769 that year — 43 per cent more than his previous year’s salary, $286,782.

In 2025, after Jack was appointed deputy minister at a starting salary of $184,554, he also received $164,007 in compensation from the City of Winnipeg, although he did not work for the city that year.

Read
Monday, Jul. 6, 2026

‘In Normandy, we remember’

Aaron Epp 4 minute read Preview

‘In Normandy, we remember’

Aaron Epp 4 minute read Yesterday at 9:09 PM CDT

Travelling nearly 7,000 km from his home in France to Winnipeg gave Gabriel Zaranski a new perspective on warfare.

“It’s very different to speak about war in school (than) to speak with real people who (have fought) in a war,” he said. “We can feel the emotion when they speak … The testimony has more impact when it’s real soldiers.”

Zaranski is one of 14 Grade 12 students from Bayeux, a town in France’s Normandy region, in Winnipeg this week for a learning tour.

The students, who attend Lycée Arcisse de Caumont high school, met on Saturday with veterans from the Queen’s Own Cameron Highlanders of Canada, a local military regiment, to discuss their studies and the regiment’s role in the Second World War.

Read
Yesterday at 9:09 PM CDT

U.S politics remains irreconcilably divided

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

U.S politics remains irreconcilably divided

Editorial 4 minute read Thursday, Nov. 10, 2022

A great many residents of the United States hoped steadfastly that this week’s midterm elections would offer some clarity, some sense of resolution and perhaps even an encouraging sign regarding the direction ahead for America’s politics.

Read
Thursday, Nov. 10, 2022

The never-ending, continuing war in Ethiopia

Gwynne Dyer 5 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

Another October coming up, and still the Nobel Peace Prize Committee refuses to give Donald Trump his prize. They even gave one to Barak Obama, who was Black and a Democrat and had only been in office for 20 minutes. Meanwhile, they ignore a man truly worthy of the prize, a man who ended eight wars last year alone. (He said so himself.)

Unfortunately the prize committee has a long record of backing the wrong person.

They gave it to Aung Sang Suu Kyi of Myanmar, who defended the Rohingya genocide: “I don’t think there is ethnic cleansing going on,” she said.

They gave it to former U.S. secretary of state Henry Kissinger, who ordered the secret carpet-bombing of Cambodia: “The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer.”

Prost! Raise a glass to Oktoberfest

Ben Sigurdson 4 minute read Preview

Prost! Raise a glass to Oktoberfest

Ben Sigurdson 4 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

As September comes to a close, a pair of local breweries are bringing some serious gemütlichkeit.

For the uninitiated, gemütlichkeit’s a word that doesn’t translate neatly from German to English, but which roughly means friendliness and good cheer.

Both Devil May Care Brewing Co. (155 Fort St.) and Kilter Brewing Co. (450 Rue Deschambault) are hosting Oktoberfest parties this weekend featuring food, music, games and, of course, plenty of beer.

Both breweries are rolling out special releases to coincide with their respective Oktoberfests — expect malty festbiers, marzens, rauchbiers and other German-inspired brews, served up in hefty steins alongside Bavarian-inspired fare. Devil May Care’s festivities run through to Sunday and feature eats by Freebird Kitchen, while Kilter keeps the party going through to Saturday, Oct. 3, and is offering pretzels and Oktoberfest-themed hot dogs. Lederhosen is encouraged.

Read
Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

Putin’s imperial dream is crumbling

Kyle Volpi Hiebert 5 minute read Preview

Putin’s imperial dream is crumbling

Kyle Volpi Hiebert 5 minute read Monday, Jun. 1, 2026

Every May 9, Russia commemorates the defeat of Nazi Germany with a Victory Day parade in Moscow’s Red Square. But the 2026 edition wasn’t so grand. Fears of Ukrainian drone strikes caused sparse attendance. No military hardware was showcased.

The lack of pageantry points to a larger truth. Four years on, what President Vladimir Putin envisioned as a swift conquest of Ukraine has devolved into an epic quagmire.

Kyiv’s deft use of unmanned systems has brought Russia’s invasion to a standstill. Legions of military drones, in the skies and on land, form an impassable kill zone 10 to 20 km deep along the front lines.

Such innovation is helping erase Ukraine’s manpower deficit. Meanwhile, Russia’s monthly casualties still number around 35,000. And that’s on top of the possibly 1.2 million killed and wounded since February 2022.

Read
Monday, Jun. 1, 2026