Polyamorous pair cool off post-cottage season

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My husband and I had an intimate relationship develop at the cottage with another couple this summer. Now that we’re all back from the lake, they don’t seem to want anything to do with us.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 04/11/2024 (697 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My husband and I had an intimate relationship develop at the cottage with another couple this summer. Now that we’re all back from the lake, they don’t seem to want anything to do with us.

In September we invited them over to our house for a dinner and wine-tasting in front of our fireplace. They thanked us for “the offer of a lovely evening,” but declined with no reason — the conversation was over.

So, in mid-October we tried another invite involving a fun night with Halloween costumes, and they turned that down flat as well. No reason and no followup conversation.

My husband and I are feeling hurt and puzzled. Are we just their naughty little secret at the lake and they don’t want anything to do with us in town? Or are they finished with us for good?

— Needing to Know, Winnipeg

Dear Needing to Know: You may be correct about this couple leaving their swinging activities at the lake.

Or it could be this pair have a city couple they’re romantic with and have switched back to them after the lake season. Another possibility is they don’t indulge their group-sex activities in the city where they know too many people.

At any rate, they’ve turned you two down flat, twice — that’s hurtful enough. As for demanding further explanation, don’t do it. There’s no point in bringing more hurt and embarrassment on yourselves. It may just have been convenient adult playtime for them while on holiday near you and they don’t have deep feelings about it.

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: I used to drink beer and take my dad’s truck to our high school dances in town. I would get a little drunk and be more outgoing. I was considered a funny guy and would soon have the girls laughing. I loved to dance when I was a bit tipsy, as well. The girls would giggle and ask where I had been hiding all that talent.

I loved a certain red-headed girl all through high school, but always lost my courage to ask to drive her home. I would leave before the last dance started.

Now I’m older and working in the city. Imagine my surprise when I ran into that same woman recently at the mall. She insisted we go for a burger.

She looked pretty, but a bit bigger. When she took her coat off, it was obvious she was pregnant. But she let me know she’s single and plans to raise the child solo.

She told me she always wanted a child, but her boyfriend didn’t. She got pregnant, but the father decided to take a job in B.C., and he moved.

I felt so sorry for the poor woman that I lost all my nervousness. We talked about a lot of things, past and present. At the end she kissed me goodbye on the cheek and wrote down her phone number.

Now what? Sure, I’d like to see her again, as she was refreshingly natural and honest. She made me laugh so hard. I hadn’t had such a good time in ages, but would I just become her substitute man/dad?

I really want to see her more. Where do I go from here? I do smell danger. What if I got attached to the child that’s coming and this woman and the kid’s father got back together?

What if he changes his mind and comes back? What should I do?

— Very Nervous, St. James

Dear Nervous: There’s a big point in your favour: This guy she was dating knew she was pregnant with his child and took off to the furthest point west in Canada he could go. He didn’t say, “Wait for me, my love. I’ll send for you and our child, and provide you money as soon as I get my first paycheque.”

It’s time to stand up for what you want, and fight for it. Tell this young woman you’ve always adored her and you would like to have a relationship with her now, and see if it builds. Yes, there’s a small chance the impregnator may come running back from B.C., but it’s unlikely.

That leaves you a lot of space to build a real relationship with the woman you have always fancied. This is your chance to get in there and fight for a relationship that far surpasses anything she ever had with the guy who ran off.

If it doesn’t work out, at least you tried your best. Show her you’re no longer just the boy with the dance moves from the farm.

The worst case is you could fall in love with the woman and the baby, and go through a lot with them, and have her say, “Thank you for being a friend, but I’m going to marry the baby’s daddy now. We have been in contact again.”

Then you say “OK, I tried. I know what I want in a relationship now and you’re not the only woman of your type. I will look for someone similar, who does love me.”

Please send your questions and comments to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Maureen Scurfield

Maureen Scurfield
Advice columnist

Maureen Scurfield writes the Miss Lonelyhearts advice column.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Thriller has steam to spare, but story slogs

Alison Gillmor 4 minute read Preview

Thriller has steam to spare, but story slogs

Alison Gillmor 4 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Based on a 2018 book by hugely popular, wildly polarizing author Colleen Hoover (whose novels It Ends with Us, Regretting You and Reminders of Him have also been made into movies), this new adaptation is being billed as a sexy psychological thriller.

There is sex — quite a lot of sex. As for those other descriptors, Verity is not only lacking in thrills. It’s almost laughably light on plausible human psychology.

Plausibility can be overrated, of course. Scripter Nick Antosca (2026’s Cape Fear) and director Michael Showalter (The Idea of You) could have thrown plausibility out the window and gone all-in on escapist fun.

But while there is a gorgeous modernist lake house and some excellent knitwear here, and Anne Hathaway, at least, seems to be having a ball with her deliciously two-faced role, Verity is mostly a sloggy mess, with draggy pacing, flat characters and a fatal lack of atmosphere.

Read
2:01 AM CDT

Americanizing education is pure folly

John R. Wiens 5 minute read Thursday, Apr. 8, 2021

BILL 64, if passed, would succeed in cutting some of the last strands tying education to democracy in the English-speaking western world, a movement which had its beginnings in the post-war European continent.

Friedrich von Hayek, the founder of neoclassical economic theory, persuaded the political elite of the day that their future lay in a deregulated capitalistic marketplace, and in the reduction of government investment in public services. But even he would be shocked by the latest developments in Manitoba.

A rough timeline would have had Hayek meeting the newly elected Tory leader, Margaret Thatcher, in 1975. Immediately upon her election as prime minister in 1979, she began to implement his economic theory of mass privatization of state assets. The oil and gas industry and the national British Airways were privatized. The powerful miners’ unions were relentlessly pilloried as enemies of the state.

Public services such as health and education were methodically dismantled, systematically privatized in the name of personal choice, while taxes for the wealthy were reduced. In the name of creativity, entrepreneurship and innovation, among other public goods, airlines, telecommunications, banking, trucking and environmental protections were deregulated. Is this starting to sound familiar?

Polyamorous pair cool off post-cottage season

Maureen Scurfield 5 minute read Monday, Nov. 4, 2024

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My husband and I had an intimate relationship develop at the cottage with another couple this summer. Now that we’re all back from the lake, they don’t seem to want anything to do with us.

In September we invited them over to our house for a dinner and wine-tasting in front of our fireplace. They thanked us for “the offer of a lovely evening,” but declined with no reason — the conversation was over.

So, in mid-October we tried another invite involving a fun night with Halloween costumes, and they turned that down flat as well. No reason and no followup conversation.

My husband and I are feeling hurt and puzzled. Are we just their naughty little secret at the lake and they don’t want anything to do with us in town? Or are they finished with us for good?

Virus variant from South Africa detected in US for 1st time

Michelle Liu And Mike Stobbe, The Associated Press 3 minute read Thursday, Jan. 28, 2021

COLUMBIA, S.C. - A new coronavirus variant identified in South Africa has been found in the United States for the first time, with two cases diagnosed in South Carolina, state health officials said Thursday.

The arrival of this variant now surging in other countries "is an important reminder to all South Carolinians that the fight against this deadly virus is far from over,” Dr. Brannon Traxler, DHEC Interim Public Health Director, said in a statement. “While more COVID-19 vaccines are on the way, supplies are still limited. Every one of us must recommit to the fight by recognizing that we are all on the front lines now. We are all in this together.”

Viruses are constantly mutating, with coronavirus variants circulating around the globe, but scientists are primarily concerned with the emergence of three of them. Other variants first reported in the United Kingdom and Brazil were previously confirmed in the U.S. Researchers believe these three variants may spread more easily, and predicted it was only a matter of time before they appeared here.

Also, scientists last week reported preliminary but troubling signs that some of the recent mutations may modestly curb the effectiveness of two current vaccines, although they stressed that the shots still protect against the disease. And there are signs that some of the new mutations may undermine tests for the virus and reduce the effectiveness of certain treatments.

Time for AI guardrails is right now

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

Time for AI guardrails is right now

Editorial 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

The genie is most definitely out of the bottle.

And while there’s little chance of putting it back in, we should be very concerned that the people who released it from the bottle are now frantically warning us that it has become disinclined to do their — or our — bidding and seems instead to be increasingly intent on following its own whims and granting wishes to itself.

The figurative genie, in this case, is artificial intelligence, or AI, and in recent weeks many of the tech geniuses responsible for its development and introduction into the digital-information realm have begun asking the U.S. government and even the United Nations to impose limits on the pace and breadth of its growth.

Their fear is that, as AI very quickly continues to advance and develops the ability to make independent decisions and essentially think for itself, it will cease to be a tool controlled by its creators and instead will become a species unto itself that might eventually decide it’s better off without humans continually messing things up.

Read
2:00 AM CDT

Today’s horoscope

Georgia Nicols 4 minute read Preview

Today’s horoscope

Georgia Nicols 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

MOON ALERT: Caution! Avoid shopping (except food and gas) and important decisions until after 3:30 p.m. today. After that, the moon moves from Gemini into Cancer.

ARIES (March 21-April 19)

This is a creative day for you. Because you’re the artisan of the zodiac, tap into your talents and make some art or explore one of your many hobbies. However, avoid intense discussions with partners, spouses and friends. Keep things light.

TAURUS (April 20-May 20)

Read
2:00 AM CDT