X is a cesspool of misogyny, so why is anyone still on it?

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Why on earth are people still on X?

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 24/01/2026 (214 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Why on earth are people still on X?

The social media platform owned by Elon Musk plunged to horrible new depths earlier this month when Grok, a chatbot integrated within X, was used to produce sexual abuse imagery of women and children — an estimated three million sexualized images in less than two weeks, according to the U.K.’s Center for Countering Digital Hate, including 23,000 images appearing to show children.

This is it, right? This is when everyone abandons X? We all know by now that years of harassment and doxxing campaigns directed at women weren’t enough to sink the cursed app formerly known as Twitter, but surely AI-generated child sexual abuse images is the line, right?

The Associated Press Files
                                How bad does a social media platform need to get to make people log off forever?

The Associated Press Files

How bad does a social media platform need to get to make people log off forever?

No one should be on X in 2026. Certainly not Canadian politicians, and yet, still they remain.

In an interview with the Free Press about the role of X in public and political life in light of Grok, Manitoba Sen. Marilou McPhedran correctly called online abuse out as “highly profitable misogyny.”

But she still uses X, as do many other Manitoban and Canadian politicians.

“As odious as it often is to even go on X, I think it remains a primary communication tool,” McPhedran said. “As a parliamentarian, I’m looking at ways, first of all, to be on social media, be as open in communication and responsive as possible, and to call out, name and work against the exploitation.”

Respectfully, a primary communication tool for whom, exactly? Who is still using it, besides bots, ragebaiters and the creators of child sexual abuse images?

There’s nothing to save, nothing to make better. It’s a social media platform run by a billionaire who allows this stuff to happen. The decision to leave should be easy.

How bad does it need to get, exactly, to make people log off forever?

● ● ●

You know times are tough when people are nostalgic for 2016.

Shortly after the calendar flipped over to 2026, I saw an influx of social media posts on platforms that are not X celebrating what many consider the Last Good Year. At least until November, I guess.

I bristled when I saw these posts, thinking: Was it actually better in 2016 or were you just very young? Sure, it was pre-pandemic and (barely) pre-Trump, but take it from an elder millennial who was 31 in 2016: things were not as rose gold as those millennial pink walls on Instagram would have you believe.

It wasn’t so much the Last Good Year as it was the Beginning of the End.

The peachy millennial vibes that gen Z is craving via these nostalgia posts were already starting to curdle. We were imprisoned in skinny jeans. What’s become known as “Obama-era optimism” was already under threat; the toxicity of girlboss feminism and hustle culture was starting to show through the Glossier sheen. #MeToo was still a year away.

And, oh yeah, women were getting harassed on Twitter.

Recall that 2016 was also the year that people were so upset about the idea of a female Ghostbusters that star Leslie Jones was subject to a barrage of sexist, racist tweets. And that’s just a single example.

One of the greatest lies ever told was that anyone “needed” to be on Twitter “for work,” particularly people in public-facing fields such as politics and journalism. It was easy to be seduced by its promise — a town square, the world at your fingertips, a chance to swap pithy one-liners or share in a cultural moment.

Back then, Twitter was at its best and most fun during televised events such as awards shows, political debates, elections, a big season finale or the Olympics.

It feels vaguely embarrassing, now, how much stock we put into live-tweeting press conferences and slinging media gossip — mostly for the benefit of other journalists.

Even at its most popular, its usage was nowhere near that of Facebook or Instagram among the general public.

It’s incredible how much harassment and misogyny women put up with as being par for the course because we “needed” to be on Twitter, and how little was ever done about it. Yes, some people wanted to be there, but eventually the question became, for what?

And then Musk bought it 2022, and now it’s an unusable cesspool of slop, abuse and propaganda.

I held on to my account for far too long, tweeting links to my Free Press articles into the abyss and being harassed by men until, finally, I obliterated it for good last year.

I don’t miss it. I don’t even think about it.

It’s beyond time for everyone who is still on it to do the same.

winnipegfreepress.com/jenzoratti

Jen Zoratti

Jen Zoratti
Columnist

Jen Zoratti is a Winnipeg Free Press columnist and author of the newsletter, NEXT, a weekly look towards a post-pandemic future.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Crown won’t appeal not-guilty verdict in Tina Fontaine murder case

Katie May 5 minute read Preview

Crown won’t appeal not-guilty verdict in Tina Fontaine murder case

Katie May 5 minute read Tuesday, Mar. 13, 2018

Nearly four years after 15-year-old Tina Fontaine was found dead, Crown prosecutors have announced they will not appeal a jury's not-guilty verdict for the man accused of killing her.

Tina's great-aunt, Thelma Favel, was informed of the decision when she met with the Crown Tuesday.

"It's not the news I wanted to hear," she said afterward. "All the systems that were supposed to help Tina failed her, even for her case. Everything failed Tina," Favel said.

"In her whole life, she would never ever have given up. So I'm not going to give up. One way or another, I will get justice for her, in some way."

Read
Tuesday, Mar. 13, 2018

Manitoba one of worst places for natives: reports

Chinta Puxley, The Canadian Press 6 minute read Preview

Manitoba one of worst places for natives: reports

Chinta Puxley, The Canadian Press 6 minute read Tuesday, Mar. 3, 2020

WINNIPEG - Federal government documents show Manitoba is one of the worst places for First Nations people to live in Canada.

Internal reports from Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development show Manitoba natives are more likely to grow up in poverty, drop out of school, live off social assistance in dilapidated housing and suffer family violence.

Their life expectancy is also eight years shorter than that of other Manitobans.

The 10 regional updates spanning 2012 to 2014 lay out the poor living conditions on Manitoba reserves, but offer little concrete action on the part of the government.

Read
Tuesday, Mar. 3, 2020

Top marks for River East’s Brown

Mike Sawatzky 5 minute read Preview

Top marks for River East’s Brown

Mike Sawatzky 5 minute read Monday, Nov. 25, 2024

He’s the best player on the No. 1-ranked varsity boys volleyball team in the province yet Matthew Brown is probably only scratching the surface of his potential.

The 6-3, 165-pound River East setter has been earning rave reviews from opponents and teammates alike while being honoured as the province’s No. 1 varsity boys player in the annual Free Press top-10 coaches’ poll.

Brown and his 42-0 Kodiaks are overwhelming favourites to advance along the path they hope will result in the school’s first AAAA varsity boys title in 41 years.

“We’re progressively getting better,” said the 17-year-old Brown earlier this week. “We were kind of raw as a group at the beginning and we’re definitely developing together, where you can see we have big transition plays, guys are making big digs and we’re able to set it out and get good kills.”

Read
Monday, Nov. 25, 2024

Bombers give would-be boo birds their marching orders

Taylor Allen 3 minute read Preview

Bombers give would-be boo birds their marching orders

Taylor Allen 3 minute read Yesterday at 7:08 PM CDT

The Winnipeg Blue Bombers are being criticized by some fans online for booking the University of North Dakota’s marching band for Friday’s game against Montreal.

With the current state of Canada-U.S. relations, and Friday being designated as Canadian Armed Forces Appreciation Night, many view the club’s decision to invite a band from a pro-Trump state as a puzzling one.

“I’m a very proud Canadian,” said Bombers head coach Mike O’Shea after Tuesday’s practice.

“But I don’t think politics enter into this entertainment realm when you’re dealing with university kids that are coming up here to put on a show.”

Read
Yesterday at 7:08 PM CDT

The rural/urban immigration difference

Patrick MacKenzie and Enver Naidoo 5 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Conversations about immigration often pretend that managing the numbers and where they go is as simple as turning a dial up or down. Like most things, the truth is more nuanced.

The Immigrant Employment Councils of Canada network’s 18-month engagement with over 1,100 employers, community and settlement service stakeholders made this apparent in many ways but, perhaps an underappreciated facet is the contrast between urban and rural immigration, and what challenges both immigrants and employers face in each context.

Rural and urban labour markets differ in structure, services and constraints, and a one-size solution will underdeliver everywhere.

This is why we have government programs such as the Rural Community Immigration Pilot, currently active in 14 areas across the country, as well as the provincial nominee program and provincial rural immigration pilots such as Manitoba’s West-Central Immigration Initiative.

Childhood hardship inspires teen to success on and off the football field

Joshua Frey-Sam 7 minute read Preview

Childhood hardship inspires teen to success on and off the football field

Joshua Frey-Sam 7 minute read Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024

Asun Ducharme is still afraid to walk alone.

The Winnipeg teen is a long way from his South Indian Lake home where he watched violence and addiction take several family members and cripple the community.

He can’t evade the images and sounds of grief that run rampant in his mind.

“It has a big impact on me. I’ve suffered a lot of PTSD type of symptoms… I always feel like someone’s trying to get me, you know?” Ducharme, 17, said.

Read
Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024