Pfizer, Moderna vaccines now preferred second dose for AstraZeneca recipients: NACI

Advertisement

Advertise with us

OTTAWA - The National Advisory Committee on Immunization said Thursday people who got the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine as their first dose should get Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna for their second shot.

Read this article for free:


By clicking the button above, an account will be created and you will begin to receive some of our recommended newsletters. You may opt out of any newsletter by visiting your Email and Communication Preferences page or by clicking "unsubscribe" at the bottom of any email.

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $1.44 a week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $5.77 plus GST every four weeks. After 52 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 17/06/2021 (1961 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

OTTAWA – The National Advisory Committee on Immunization said Thursday people who got the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine as their first dose should get Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna for their second shot.

On June 1, NACI had said AstraZeneca recipients “could” get Pfizer or Moderna for their second shot if they wanted, but Thursday went further to say an mRNA vaccine was the “preferred” choice.

“Since NACI first looked at mixed vaccine schedules, new evidence is starting to emerge suggesting immune responses are better when a first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine is followed by an mRNA vaccine as a second dose,” said NACI vice-chair Dr. Shelley Deeks, in the new guidance documents.

Workers unload a shipment of the Moderna COVID‑19 vaccine at the FedEx hub at Pearson International Airport in Toronto on Thursday, May 20, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Cole Burston
Workers unload a shipment of the Moderna COVID‑19 vaccine at the FedEx hub at Pearson International Airport in Toronto on Thursday, May 20, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Cole Burston

NACI also updated its previous recommendation that people at high risk of exposure to, or serious illness from, COVID-19, could opt to get AstraZeneca rather than waiting for Pfizer or Moderna. Now NACI says everyone should always get the mRNA vaccines first, unless they are allergic to them.

Deeks said the advice is based on the growing supply of Pfizer and Moderna, and the risk of vaccine-induced blood clots associated with AstraZeneca. But she is still trying to reassure people who got one or two doses of AstraZeneca’s vaccine that they are nevertheless well protected.

“Anyone who has already received two doses of AstraZeneca/Covishield can rest assured that they are protected, particularly against severe illness,” she said. “There is no need for a third dose at this time.”

Dr. Theresa Tam, the chief public health officer of Canada, said the new evidence in favour of mixing different types of vaccines included four studies in Germany.

“It’s really the immunogenicity, that immune response, after that mixed-dose schedule that’s resulted in NACI updating this recommendation, because all the accumulated studies essentially suggest that immune response is a better response,” said Tam at a news conference in Ottawa.

One of those studies from Germany’s Saarland University, published early data Wednesday saying giving Pfizer as the second dose after AstraZeneca, or two doses of Pfizer only, generated far more antibodies and T cells as two doses of AstraZeneca.

The mixed-dose schedule was slightly better than two doses of Pfizer at producing the neutralizing antibodies and killer T cells that are critical to preventing infection or serious illness.

Quebec was not moving to follow NACI’s advice. Health Minister Christian Dubé, who got two doses of AstraZeneca himself, said Quebec is still saying people can opt for a mixed schedule or two doses of AstraZeneca, depending on their personal choice.

Almost 25 million Canadians have now received at least one dose of vaccine, and almost six million are now fully vaccinated.

As of June 5, 2.1 million people had received one dose of AstraZeneca, and 15,186 had received two doses.

Canada has received 56 reports of blood clots following an AstraZeneca vaccination, and 38 are now confirmed as vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia, or VITT.

There are no further shipments of AstraZeneca currently scheduled, but there are about 600,000 doses still left from previous deliveries.

There are 14 million doses of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna being delivered this week and next, including a donation of one million doses of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine from the United States that was to arrive in Canada Thursday night.

The donation won’t cost Canada anything, and will be on top of the 44 million doses Canada has purchased directly from Moderna.

It comes less than a week after Canada promised to donate 13 million doses to the COVAX vaccine-sharing alliance, which will entirely come from the remaining share of doses Canada had purchased from COVAX itself.

Canada has been heavily criticized for buying three times as many doses of COVID-19 vaccine than it needs and not sharing any doses from its own direct purchase agreements with vaccine makers. The World Health Organization has made repeated pleas for wealthier countries to share more doses with developing countries, some of whom have vaccinated very few people at all.

Canada expects to have fully vaccinated 75 per cent of all eligible Canadians — everyone over the age of 12 — by the end of July, and has administered 78 doses for every 100 Canadians. Across Africa, nations have given out three doses for every 100 people.

“Taking vaccines at a time when we are nearing complete vaccination when many developing countries are so far behind makes Canada a vaccine hoarder and leaves Canadians vulnerable to dangerous variants,” said NDP health critic Don Davies.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 17, 2021.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Building healthier Canadians

Jason M. Sutherland 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Ottawa is betting that billions of taxpayer dollars spent on steel, asphalt and concrete will secure Canada’s economic future and prosperity. Through the $51 billion Build Communities Strong fund, the federal government is paying for roads, bridges, water systems and transit to boost productivity and attract capital from Europe and Asia.

As the shovels hit the ground from Halifax to Vancouver, Canadians should be asking themselves: What good does it do to build a stronger country if we are not building healthier Canadians?

The fund’s $5 billion allocation for health infrastructure is welcome news, as many of our hospitals and long-term care homes across the country are showing severe signs of aging, and modern care centres are much needed. But pouring concrete for new facilities is not the same as building a healthy population.

A ribbon-cutting at a modern hospital does not guarantee you see a family doctor when you need one, keep a rural emergency department open overnight, or shorten the wait for a knee replacement keeping someone off the job or robbing a retiree of independence.

Is Canada headed for time chaos this weekend?

Michelle Bastian 5 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

When Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew declared Sept. 17 that the province would remain on permanent daylight time, he suggested it was a historical moment people would share with their “great-great-grandkids.” But, while Sunday, Nov. 1 has been heralded as the date many Canadians will stop changing their clocks, there are rumblings behind the scenes suggesting this will actually cause more trouble than ever before.

There are, of course, the warnings from chrono-biologists and sleep scientists about the damage permanent daylight time will do. The lighter evenings will mean many more dark mornings. But there is another set of problems in the offing in the critical infrastructure that underpins our digital lives.

While it used to be common to spend the Sunday morning after a time change going around our homes updating the clocks, we now wake up to devices that have already adjusted to the new time. These automatic updates occur regularly for daylight time, as well as when we travel to new time zones.

Our clocks are able to change by themselves owing to the hard work of a group of volunteers who were recently named in a list of the people who hold up the internet. This group, led by Paul Eggert, a computer scientist at UCLA, maintains a little-known tool called the Time Zone Database. Since the 1980s, it has kept track of regional, national and international debates about clock time and provided an up-to-date table of what time it should be on our walls.

City rec facilities crumbling

Ryan Thorpe 6 minute read Preview

City rec facilities crumbling

Ryan Thorpe 6 minute read Monday, Oct. 22, 2018

Throughout Winnipeg, decades-old community assets — pools, arenas and recreation and leisure centres — are deteriorating so quickly that service disruptions are inevitable.

Meanwhile, the city’s community services department, which is responsible for managing those assets, operates with an annual deficit of roughly $80 million, meaning there are scant resources to do little more than bail water on a sinking ship.

Soon, Winnipeggers will have a choice: fewer community services or higher costs.

“It poses a huge challenge because we have very limited dollars that we have to invest in our existing facilities. We also have growing demands for new amenities in new areas. We have to be very strategic,” said Ken McKim, manager of asset management for the department.

Read
Monday, Oct. 22, 2018

Manitoba family adopts Ukrainian children just before Russian invasion

Chris Kitching 7 minute read Preview

Manitoba family adopts Ukrainian children just before Russian invasion

Chris Kitching 7 minute read Wednesday, Mar. 30, 2022

When Trish Braun sees horrific images of Russia’s attack on Ukraine, the Manitoba mother is thankful she had enough time to flee from the country with her three adopted children.

Other Canadian families weren’t as fortunate, as Ukraine halted intercountry adoptions due to the Kremlin’s unprovoked invasion and war.

“I’m so thankful we were able to get out, but lots (of Ukrainians) don’t have the option of getting to leave,” said Braun, who lives in Grunthal, about 50 kilometres southeast of Winnipeg. “It’s hard to adjust to life here while our hearts are over there.”

Just days before Russia began its assault, Braun was staying in the Odesa region with the three Ukrainian children — siblings Daniel, 16, Lewis, 10, and Paige, 6 — that she and her husband, Mike, 43, had adopted from an orphanage.

Read
Wednesday, Mar. 30, 2022

Letters, Oct. 30

7 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Embarrassed by turnout

I am ashamed by the poor turnout of voters in the recent municipal election in Winnipeg. Just 38 per cent of eligible voters is a disgrace to the thousands of men and women who gave their lives in past wars, where they were defending democracy and the right to vote.

My grandfather was an infantry soldier in the First World War, and my father-in-law flew in Avro Lancasters in the Second World War. For both I am grateful.

Maybe the 62 per cent that had a flimsy excuse for not voting will keep this mind for the next election. People died for our right to vote.

The volatile U.S. midterms

Allan Levine 5 minute read Preview

The volatile U.S. midterms

Allan Levine 5 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

The last time the Democratic Party had 218 or more seats — the number required to control the U.S. House of Representatives — was from 2021 to 2023, following the election of Democrat Joe Biden as president. During that same period, the Democrats also had the edge in the Senate. Despite a 50-50 split with the Republicans, Democrats were able to control the Senate with the help of Vice-President Kamala Harris, who cast the key vote in a tie. From 2023 to 2025, the Democrats had a slim 51 to 49 Senate majority.

If history repeats itself and the latest polls are fairly accurate, on Tuesday, Nov. 3, the Democratic Party will take back the House and (probably) the Senate from the Republicans, who have controlled both legislative bodies since the 2024 election. In the House, the Democrats have to gain at least three more seats. In the Senate, they have to win four more, which is entirely doable, though they almost certainly have to win a seat in Texas, Ohio, Kansas or Alaska, each of which currently has two Republican senators.

The prospect of a Democratic victory has President Donald Trump in a tizzy. For the past two years, he has abused his executive power to impose illegal tariffs on Canada and other countries; started a war with Iran; cozied up to Russian president Vladimir Putin and turned his back on Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy; and increased the national debt through questionable tax cuts — to list only a few of his more egregious actions. He has been able to get away with this mainly because Republicans in the Senate and the House refuse to even question his decisions.

With the Democrats in charge, Trump’s brazen actions won’t be completely halted, but he will face significant legislative challenges and obstacles not easily dismissed. His controversial appointees, such as Attorney General Todd Blanche, who perceives himself as Trump’s private lawyer rather than the legal representative of the people, won’t get a free pass in committee hearings.

Read
2:00 AM CDT