Attitude on carbon tax rebate defined by politics, not facts, survey suggests

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Rebates on carbon taxes haven't helped Canadians warm to them, a new survey suggests.

Read this article for free:


By clicking the button above, an account will be created and you will begin to receive some of our recommended newsletters. You may opt out of any newsletter by visiting your Email and Communication Preferences page or by clicking "unsubscribe" at the bottom of any email.

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $1.44 a week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $5.77 plus GST every four weeks. After 52 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 25/01/2022 (1741 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Rebates on carbon taxes haven’t helped Canadians warm to them, a new survey suggests.

Results published this week in the journal Nature Climate Change say that not only did rebates fail to make much difference to public opinion, Canadians don’t understand them very well.

And those convinced they were paying more in carbon taxes than they received remained just as convinced even when they were shown the facts.

Tax forms and Canadian currency are shown together in this photo illustration taken in Toronto on Sunday, April 3, 2016. A new survey suggests rebates on carbon taxes haven't helped Canadians warm to them. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Graeme Roy
Tax forms and Canadian currency are shown together in this photo illustration taken in Toronto on Sunday, April 3, 2016. A new survey suggests rebates on carbon taxes haven't helped Canadians warm to them. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Graeme Roy

“Partisanship had a big impact — not just on whether people were supportive of the idea of carbon pricing, but on their perception of the facts,” said co-author Kathryn Harrison of the University of British Columbia.

Harrison said she and her colleagues wanted to study whether carbon rebates — returning money to taxpayers to offset or even exceed the amount they’d paid in carbon taxes — would make the policy more palatable.

“Canada was one of the first two countries to do that,” Harrison said. “There was an opportunity to systematically check what was the impact of the policy.”

The team surveyed Canadians between early 2019 and March 2020. They looked at Saskatchewan and Ontario, whose residents get the federal rebate; Quebec, which uses a cap-and-trade system to reduce carbon; British Columbia, which has a provincial carbon tax without rebates; and Alberta, which ended up on the federal program halfway through the study when it cancelled its provincial levy.

Respondents were queried after the rebate plan was announced, after it was implemented, after the first rebates were issued, after the 2019 federal election and a year after the initial announcement. The sample size was 3,313 at the start and 899 by the end of the fifth survey.

“There was no magic,” said Harrison.

The survey found, at most, minor changes in support for carbon pricing over time in all five provinces. British Columbia, which doesn’t offer rebates, showed the biggest increase at about 10 percentage points. No province showed a decrease.

There were wide gaps in support between self-identified Liberal and Conservative respondents.

But the researchers found nearly half the Ontario respondents and about a quarter of those in Saskatchewan didn’t even know they got a rebate. Those who did consistently underestimated the amount by an average of 40 per cent in Ontario and 32 per cent in Saskatchewan.

When researchers showed the respondents the true value of their rebate, a simple calculation that requires no tax data, the results again split over political affiliation.

“After learning how much they were getting back, Conservative voters were more likely to report they were net losers, that they were paying more in taxes than they were getting back,” Harrison said.

“They must have increased their estimate of how much they were paying up front,” she said. “(They) seem to have adjusted their beliefs in order to support their position of opposition to the federal carbon tax.”

When the researchers conducted similar surveys in Switzerland, the other country to have implemented a rebate system, Harrison said the results were similar.

The results are discouraging for those who think of the public as composed of rational actors coolly evaluating information and acting on their best interests, Harrison said.

“Giving people back money doesn’t automatically shift the politics of it.

“Canadians are getting their signals on this type of policy from people they trust, whether it’s interest groups or politicians. In many cases, they are basing those positions on inaccurate information.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 25, 2022.

— Follow Bob Weber on Twitter at @row1960

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Fact Check

1 minute read Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023

Fact Check

Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly |

Behind the scenes at circus spectacle Odysseo, it's the horses who hold the reins

Erin Lebar / Photos by Ruth Bonneville 15 minute read Preview

Behind the scenes at circus spectacle Odysseo, it's the horses who hold the reins

Erin Lebar / Photos by Ruth Bonneville 15 minute read Wednesday, Jun. 13, 2018

It’s almost 4 p.m. on a particularly steamy May afternoon and Cavalia Odysseo rider Chelsea Jordan is putting on her makeup in the back corner of the very humid artistic tent.

She’s already spent some time layering on foundation, and is now into the decorative portion of the 30-minute process, placing a pair of small gems on her forehead and enhancing her naturally sharp cheekbones with some extra contouring.

“This is the messy part of the business,” she jokes as she sticks on fake lashes over an eyelid covered in earth-toned shadow.

It’s odd that makeup is considered the messy part of the day when Jordan spends the majority of her time surrounded by horses, but as with most people involved in Odysseo, the glitzy and glamorous aspects of being a member of the largest touring production in the world aren’t nearly as fun as the time she gets to spend with her four-legged cast-mates.

Read
Wednesday, Jun. 13, 2018

One-on-one Journalism Training

0 minute read Wednesday, Jun. 18, 2025

The new normal in Canadian politics

David McLaughlin 5 minute read Preview

The new normal in Canadian politics

David McLaughlin 5 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

“Nothing happening, all at once.”

Welcome to the new normal of Canadian politics, where normality is the new normal. Routine and stable are in; disruptive and excessive are out. Exhibits A and B are the Alberta referendum and the British Columbia election. Voters opted for stability over volatility.

The opposite of being normal is being different from the norm. In politics that means different from where we’ve been and what we’ve come to expect. Two competing trends have dominated our politics for the past decade and a half — progressivism and populism. Think Justin Trudeau and liberal, progressive identity politics in Canada, and Donald Trump and conservative, populist MAGA politics in America. We are now experiencing a swing away from both those trends.

Representing this “new normal” are Prime Minister Mark Carney, for one, and newly elected British Columbia premier, Lorne Doerksen, for another. Both are considered normal because they talk and act like adults in a childish political world. Their political flair is to not have any political flair. They stand out for not standing out.

Read
2:01 AM CDT

Nine more deaths, 107 new COVID-19 cases in Manitoba

Katie May 6 minute read Preview

Nine more deaths, 107 new COVID-19 cases in Manitoba

Katie May 6 minute read Monday, Dec. 28, 2020

Manitoba is restarting its COVID-19 vaccination efforts, following a five-day break — and amidst questions about the delay.

The planned pause over Christmas was in the name of efficiency, a provincial government spokesman says, offering no other explanation on the reasoning behind the decision not to vaccinate anyone Dec. 24-28.

On Monday, the province announced nine more pandemic deaths and 107 new cases of the novel coronavirus.

As part of Manitoba's vaccination plan, the most recent immunization clinic happened Dec. 23; the next was set to start Dec. 29.

Read
Monday, Dec. 28, 2020

Court ruling concludes Canadian Wheat Board saga

Laura Rance-Unger 4 minute read Preview

Court ruling concludes Canadian Wheat Board saga

Laura Rance-Unger 4 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

It remains to be seen whether the recent court ruling in a lawsuit filed after Canadian Wheat Board’s dissolution in 2012 puts the whole debate to rest, as some no doubt hope.

But either way, the dust has settled on the post-CWB world. The sun still rises and a new generation of farmers on the land only knows by name an institution that for generations influenced every aspect of Prairie grain farming.

The first Rural Revival column I wrote for this newspaper more than 30 years ago was about a thousand farmers from Western Canada demonstrating in support of the Wheat Board. It was in the aftermath of the Western Grain Marketing Panel report, one of several efforts that eventually included a plebiscite to help the federal government decide what to do about a vocal minority of farmers who wanted marketing “freedom.”

The polls at the time suggested about two-thirds of farmers were comfortable enough with the single-desk system for food wheat and barley to keep it around. It served as a counterbalance to canola, which they sold on the open market. They essentially had a dual market.

Read
2:01 AM CDT