Saskatchewan takes federal carbon tax fight to Supreme Court of Canada

Advertisement

Advertise with us

SASKATOON - The Saskatchewan government has filed notice that it is taking its challenge of the federal carbon tax to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Read this article for free:


By clicking the button above, an account will be created and you will begin to receive some of our recommended newsletters. You may opt out of any newsletter by visiting your Email and Communication Preferences page or by clicking "unsubscribe" at the bottom of any email.

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $1.44 a week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $5.77 plus GST every four weeks. After 52 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 31/05/2019 (2713 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

SASKATOON – The Saskatchewan government has filed notice that it is taking its challenge of the federal carbon tax to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Justice Minister Don Morgan says the province will ask the high court to rule on whether the tax is constitutional and whether Ottawa has the jurisdiction to impose it.

Saskatchewan’s Court of Appeal ruled in a split decision earlier this month that the tax is constitutional.

Don Morgan, then-deputy premier of Saskatchewan, speaks to reporters following the speech from the throne at the Legislative Building in Regina on October 25, 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Mark Taylor
Don Morgan, then-deputy premier of Saskatchewan, speaks to reporters following the speech from the throne at the Legislative Building in Regina on October 25, 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Mark Taylor

It also said that establishing minimum national standards for a price on greenhouse gas emissions falls under federal jurisdiction.

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe, who has said the tax hurts his province economically, promised there would be an appeal.

Morgan said the province has two months to file a factum to the Supreme Court.

“Our government will continue to stand up for Saskatchewan people against what we believe is an unconstitutional tax on their families, communities, and businesses,” Morgan said Friday in Saskatoon.

He added that if the Liberals lose the federal election in October, there may be no federal tax left to fight. The Conservatives have promised to scrap the tax.

“The Supreme Court could say it’s moot, it’s not worth hearing because the government has changed the law,” said Morgan. “Or they could say, ‘No, this is a matter of import. We want to create a precedent.'”

A government spokesperson said in an email that the province does not have to ask for a leave to appeal in this case.

The federal tax has been imposed on provinces that have not implemented their own carbon levies: Ontario, New Brunswick, Saskatchewan and Manitoba.

Ontario and Manitoba are also fighting the federal tax in court and Alberta has said it will join the legal battle.

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney’s government officially killed the province’s carbon tax on Thursday. Federal Environment Minister Catherine McKenna said Ottawa’s tax would be imposed on the province as soon as possible.

Kenney said Friday that Alberta has not yet received a formal notice from the federal government on its tax.

“If and when we receive that, I will instruct our lawyers to proceed with filing a judicial reference to the Alberta Court of Appeal.”

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Deluxe apartment tower taking shape in Tuxedo

Ben Waldman 4 minute read Preview

Deluxe apartment tower taking shape in Tuxedo

Ben Waldman 4 minute read Monday, Aug. 22, 2022

The owners of a shopping strip in the city’s wealthiest neighbourhood have identified the site of a longtime gas station on Corydon Avenue as an untapped residential resource.

Read
Monday, Aug. 22, 2022

Brandon cancer patients lament oncologist’s depature

Rylee Gerrard 4 minute read Yesterday at 8:41 PM EST

BRANDON — Cancer patients across Brandon say they are heartbroken by the impending departure of medical oncologist Dr. Brady Anderson from the Western Manitoba Cancer Centre.

When Lesa Carey learned Anderson would be leaving his role as the sole medical oncologist outside of Winnipeg due to burnout and a lack of additional compensation, she said it made her “sick to my stomach.”

“I can honestly say that the three scariest words someone I think could ever hear is, ‘You have cancer,’” said Carey, a Brandon resident who was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2024.

“My husband and I walked into the appointment at CancerCare overwhelmed, terrified and scared for my life. After meeting with Dr. Anderson, we left informed, listened to, and felt extremely cared about.”

MLA walks back ‘let them steal’ comments

Malak Abas 4 minute read Preview

MLA walks back ‘let them steal’ comments

Malak Abas 4 minute read Yesterday at 4:51 PM EST

A Manitoba MLA has apologized for “confusion” caused by comments she made suggesting retail workers are told to let thieves steal, after those comments went viral on social media.

While debating Bill 210, which would amend the laws that determine civil claims for damages made by anyone 12 or older who trespasses for the purpose of committing a crime, Seine River MLA Billie Cross said the amendments introduced by the Opposition could “give people carte blanche to make justice decisions in a split second when they’re in fear.”

“I don’t think anyone’s property is more valuable than a human life. That’s why we have insurance, that’s why we buy insurance for our property, that’s why it’s so important that we not put ourselves in the line of fire when something’s being stolen,” she said Oct. 29 in the Manitoba Legislature.

“You know, we tell people who work in retail, ‘someone comes in, they want to steal, let them steal.’ It’s not worth your life, we’ve seen what happens when people don’t do that.”

Read
Yesterday at 4:51 PM EST

iPhone started fire, Winnipegger says

Kevin Rollason 3 minute read Preview

iPhone started fire, Winnipegger says

Kevin Rollason 3 minute read Tuesday, Nov. 26, 2019

The iPhone has long been a hot item, but for one Winnipeg family, it got too hot.

Wally Hill says earlier this month, he, along with his wife and daughter, were watching television, with his daughter's iPhone 6 sitting unplugged on the cushion between them, when the smartphone set the couch on fire.

"It was frightening," Hill said. "It didn't explode... it fizzled and popped open at the back, and then smoke and flames came out the back. It then ignited the cushion."

Hill said he quickly picked up the entire couch cushion, with the burning phone still on it, to move the device to a tile floor in his residence.

Read
Tuesday, Nov. 26, 2019

Time to open our eyes about AI

Alex Passey 5 minute read Monday, Jul. 20, 2026

The word “Luddite” carries a particular connotation. Typically, it’s a term of mockery hurled at a person deemed technophobic, perhaps simply too stupid to appreciate modern technology. But the Luddites were a real group of people with an important place in history. And it isn’t fair they’ve become synonymous with ignorance.

In 19th century Britain, technological advances in the textile industry reduced the amount of labour necessary in manufacturing. Unsurprisingly, this new tech was implemented to undercut labourers, reducing both jobs and wages, with zero social safety net in place to compensate the workers’ loss of livelihoods. The capitalist owners profited massively as they shunted workers aside.

Rather than accommodating these displaced labourers, the government passed legislation restricting workers’ ability to collectively bargain. People began to go hungry and the institutions of society met their rumbling bellies with indifference.

Then the riots started. With no other recourse, workers began to smash, loot and burn, all under the aegis of a mythical leader they named Ned Ludd, which is how they earned their moniker.

Bloviating ingrate simply doesn’t rate

Maureen Scurfield 5 minute read Yesterday at 2:00 AM EST

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: I was at a party with my younger boyfriend, and I overheard him in another room talking loudly with his friends.

They were all bombed, guzzling beer and rating their girlfriends’ looks. I was listening for my guy to chime in. He finally said I was “a five without makeup, a 6 1/2 with it, but her great personality makes up for the rest.”

I can’t believe he would say that to other people, but he was drinking a lot — disgusting. I’m thinking of leaving him. What do you think?

— ‘Five Without Makeup,’ Osborne Village