Faith groups concerned by growing military spending

Advertisement

Advertise with us

In response to growing threats around the world, Canada is increasing its military spending. In March, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the country had met its NATO benchmark of spending two per cent of GDP on defence, with plans to spend five per cent by 2035.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

In response to growing threats around the world, Canada is increasing its military spending. In March, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the country had met its NATO benchmark of spending two per cent of GDP on defence, with plans to spend five per cent by 2035.

Is this the right direction? Is the money being spent in the best way possible? And what about other forms of international engagement such as aid, diplomacy and peacemaking?

Those were some of the questions raised by 14 faith groups in the United Kingdom in July in response to that country’s decision to increase military spending by 20 billion euros (C$32.5 billion) per year over the next decade.

In a joint letter with other organizations, the groups expressed “grave concerns” about how spending on weapons was being given priority over other ways of promoting global security such as aid, diplomacy and peacebuilding — things that are “essential and underfunded tools in building a safer world,” they stated.

Citing polling in that country that showed public support for peacebuilding, climate action and international co-operation, the letter went on to state that there “is a clear public appetite for broader discussion on how to build a more secure, resilient and peaceful world … it is clear that British people conceive security in a broad range of ways beyond military force.”

The U.K. letter got me thinking about whether Canadian faith groups are asking for a similar discussion in this country.

One group that is raising questions is the Canadian Council of Churches. It is doing that through its peace research institute, Project Ploughshares.

Paul Heidebrecht, who directs Project Ploughshares, acknowledged the landscape of the world has shifted when it comes to defence. But he believes Canadians need more conversation about how much to spend on the military.

“We need a time-out to talk about this,” he said, adding that the goal of five per cent of GDP “feels arbitrary to me.”

Heidebrecht also questions if building weapons is the best strategy for creating employment for Canadians.

“Will it create jobs for the long term?” he said, adding that he wonders if those jobs will disappear once Canada’s defence needs are met or if all those new weapons factories will start looking for export customers to keep going.

“That could see us ending up selling things to countries in ways that compromise our values,” he said.

While defence is getting a big increase, the federal government is cutting international development — something Heidebrecht sees as also being important to Canadian security. “There’s almost no debate about that,” he said.

Another group calling for conversations about defence spending is Mennonite Central Committee Canada. Through its Bread, Not Bombs campaign, MCC Canada is inviting people to send a letter to the prime minister to tell him they care about how Canada engages with the world, and that they are concerned about the decrease in foreign aid while military spending increases.

“Canada has the opportunity to be a good global neighbour by investing in peace, justice, and human flourishing,” says the letter, which can be found on MCC Canada’s website.

It adds that the country should “prioritize diplomatic and peacebuilding efforts over expanding military spending.”

“This is a moment for churches and Canadians who care about global flourishing to send that message to the government,” said Anna Vogt, who directs MCC Canada’s Ottawa office.

When it comes to how Canada spends money, Vogt also believes there is a need for greater conversation.

“Let’s talk about the choices we can make,” she said.

This includes discussion about peacemaking, which has helped define Canada internationally since the 1950s.

“There’s a role for peacebuilding in the world,” Vogt said, adding that humanitarian aid also plays an important role in global security.

“While Canada increases the defence budget, we should not lose sight of what we can do through peacekeeping.”

Sandra Wiens is in charge of government relations for the Canadian Friends Service Committee, also known as Quakers. She believes “there are far better ways to spend money than on the military” when it comes to global security.

Quakers are especially concerned about how military spending might take money away from social programs and foreign aid, she said, and about the lack of funding for peacekeeping.

That historic approach to international conflict “has been systematically dismantled over time,” Wiens stated.

Wiens also believes there is a need for a national conversation about what security means to Canadians. For her, that conversation would include questions such as: “What are the threats? What are the best ways to address them? What are we cutting to fund the military? What is the role of foreign aid? What will lessen conflict, or create more of it?”

Right now, there is no space for those questions, Wiens said.

“Let’s start a conversation. Let’s listen to other voices … let’s not only talk about military necessity.”

Jdl562000@yahoo.com

The Free Press is committed to covering faith in Manitoba through our Religion in the News project. This reporting continues because readers like you step forward to fund it.

Donate now to support our reporting on religion.

Your donation is eligible for a charitable tax receipt. BECOME A FAITH JOURNALISM SUPPORTER

John Longhurst

John Longhurst
Faith reporter

John Longhurst has been writing for Winnipeg's faith pages since 2003. He also writes for Religion News Service in the U.S., and blogs about the media, marketing and communications at Making the News.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

The Free Press acknowledges the financial support it receives from members of the city’s faith community, which makes our coverage of religion possible.

More Stories

Faith groups concerned by growing military spending

John Longhurst 5 minute read Saturday, Aug. 8, 2026

In response to growing threats around the world, Canada is increasing its military spending. In March, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the country had met its NATO benchmark of spending two per cent of GDP on defence, with plans to spend five per cent by 2035.

Is this the right direction? Is the money being spent in the best way possible? And what about other forms of international engagement such as aid, diplomacy and peacemaking?

Those were some of the questions raised by 14 faith groups in the United Kingdom in July in response to that country’s decision to increase military spending by 20 billion euros (C$32.5 billion) per year over the next decade.

In a joint letter with other organizations, the groups expressed “grave concerns” about how spending on weapons was being given priority over other ways of promoting global security such as aid, diplomacy and peacebuilding — things that are “essential and underfunded tools in building a safer world,” they stated.

The port of Churchill — but done right

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

The port of Churchill — but done right

Editorial 4 minute read Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

The seagoing grain carrier wasn’t christened with a champagne bottle. There was no confetti or streamers. Nevertheless, the Aug. 31 event marking the first shipment of grain to be loaded at the Port of Churchill since 2020 was celebrated like the launch of a brand new vessel.

The presence of the federal minister of northern and arctic affairs, provincial cabinet ministers and leaders and elders from several northern First Nations signalled that the fast-tracked process of refurbishing and buffing up Manitoba’s deep-water seaport gem is gaining momentum.

For OneNorth, the partnership of 29 First Nations and 12 northern communities which owns the Port of Churchill and the Hudson Bay Railway (both operated by the Arctic Gateway Group) the event heralded a new beginning. It’s been eight years since OneNorth purchased the port and railroad, and six years since grain was moved by rail through Manitoba and then by ship to European markets. Two more grain shipments, plus shipments of potash and critical minerals, will continue through the fall.

When Prime Minister Mark Carney solicited the premiers to suggest “nation-building” projects following his election in 2025, Premier Wab Kinew pitched a Manitoba trade corridor that would move wheat, critical minerals, potash and energy (oil or liquid natural gas) through the Port of Churchill.

Read
Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

9 to 5:

Tory McNally 8 minute read Preview

9 to 5:

Tory McNally 8 minute read Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

I watched the 1980 comedy 9 to 5 for the first time this week.

I know: I’m an HR consultant. I’ve been doing this work for 13 years, I write about workplaces for a living, and somehow I had never actually watched the movie that gave us one of the most recognizable workplace songs of all time.

I knew the premise, of course. I knew American music icon Dolly Parton was in it. I knew there was a terrible boss and three women who eventually decided they had enough.

I expected a funny, somewhat dated movie about three women getting revenge on an awful boss. What I didn’t expect was to spend the next two hours thinking about how much has changed in the workplace since 1980 — and how much really hasn’t.

Read
Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

Ottawa urged to boost local colleges

Alex Lambert 2 minute read Preview

Ottawa urged to boost local colleges

Alex Lambert 2 minute read Thursday, Feb. 19, 2026

BRANDON — Governments need to support local colleges to help Manitoba’s future workforce, Assiniboine College president Mark Frison told a Brandon Chamber of Commerce luncheon on Thursday.

Frison said it’s time for the federal government to step up, as the provincial government has added seats and programs for the college in multiple sectors.

“If all the dentists, architects and, unfortunately, physicians can be trained in Winnipeg, there is no reason why other occupations can’t be (trained) at other parts of the province,” Frison said.

“Just like we train all the apprenticeship welders and agricultural technologists here in Brandon.”

Read
Thursday, Feb. 19, 2026

Dark money drags democracy toward the abyss

Russell Wangersky 6 minute read Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

There’s an object lesson playing out to the south of us, and not exactly the one you may be thinking about.

It’s not the obvious one of “don’t elect a federal leader who has a clear history of caring about his own grievances before he thinks about the needs of his citizens,” or more simply, “don’t elect someone who is less an agent of change than he is an agent of chaos.”

No, the lesson playing out to the south of us — one likely to have an impact on U.S. midterm elections later this fall as well as the last U.S. presidential election — is that there is a clear danger in allowing dark money to fuel political campaigns.

There are estimates that political action campaigns — or PACs — will once again dump billions of U.S. dollars into the mix, funding advertising campaigns and other political campaign efforts, and steamrolling less-funded efforts.

Evaluating the athletic complaint process

Mac Horsburgh 4 minute read Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

Be careful what you wish for.

The fervent desire of our Canadian sports communities to attain objectivity in processing complaints has led to the creation of a completely unregulated industry for complaint investigations.

As it stands, professional self-regulation has been criticized for operating in its own self-interest rather than the public interest.

But now we have a new Independent Third Party (ITP) industry which operates without licensing or oversight in carrying out its duties relating to reviewing and conducting investigations into athletic complaints.