Christians protesting public health orders misguided

Advertisement

Advertise with us

As Canadians grow increasingly weary of public health order restrictions and frustrated by the continual infringement on their daily lives, some churches are pushing back against being denied the opportunity to gather together to worship.

Read this article for free:


By clicking the button above, an account will be created and you will begin to receive some of our recommended newsletters. You may opt out of any newsletter by visiting your Email and Communication Preferences page or by clicking "unsubscribe" at the bottom of any email.

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $1.44 a week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $5.77 plus GST every four weeks. After 52 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 12/05/2021 (1995 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

As Canadians grow increasingly weary of public health order restrictions and frustrated by the continual infringement on their daily lives, some churches are pushing back against being denied the opportunity to gather together to worship.

A few of these churches have found unlikely allies in those who are constantly wary of governments trying to limit individual citizen’s personal rights. Most recently, this “alliance” has resulted in legal challenges in the courts asserting that public health orders violate charter-protected freedoms of conscience, religion, expression and peaceful assembly.

While they might believe they are acting in the best interests of Christian discipleship and God’s call, they are misguided on several fronts.

JOHN WOODS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS Church of God minister Tobias Tissen speaks at an anti-mask rally at the Forks. A group of anti-maskers gathered at the Forks for a rally in Winnipeg Sunday, April 25, 2021. Reporter: ?
JOHN WOODS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS Church of God minister Tobias Tissen speaks at an anti-mask rally at the Forks. A group of anti-maskers gathered at the Forks for a rally in Winnipeg Sunday, April 25, 2021. Reporter: ?

One of the pastors involved is quoted as saying, “We have no authority, scripturally based and based on Christian convictions, to limit anyone from coming to hear the word of God. We have no authority to tell people you can’t come to church. That’s in God’s jurisdiction.”

The New Testament presents quite a different picture of the responsibility of the Church for itself. The first example of this is in Matthew’s Gospel.

When Peter is given the revelation about who Jesus truly is, Jesus begins to share God’s authority with the disciples. “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven,” he said. (Matt. 16:19)

This authority is not limited to Peter. The same authority is given to the gathered assembly of Christ’s disciples. (Matthew 18:18)

Much of the content of the New Testament Epistles, particularly those written by Paul, confronts and admonishes churches to teach, direct and sometimes even discipline their members so as to not hinder or distort the mission of the Gospel in the world and Christ’s command to his Church.

What is that Gospel? It is the supreme command of Jesus Christ “to love one another as I (Jesus) have loved you.”

In 1 Corinthians chapter 9, Paul outlines the many ways in which he sacrifices his own self, his rights and privileges, his freedom in Christ, in order to effectively witness to the love of Christ. “I have become all things to all people, that I might by all means save some,” he said. (I Cor. 9:22)

For the Christian disciple, the effective demonstration and proclamation of the love of God for all people must take precedence over any personal demand or freedom. This is what it means to serve the Lord. The New Testament even uses the stronger term “slave” to describe a Christian’s devotion to Christ.

Another pastor was quoted as saying, “We are here to fight for God. We are here to defend the vulnerable.”

The vulnerable we need to be worried about are those being exposed to COVID-19 by people not following the public health orders. It is those languishing on ventilators in ICUs in hospitals across our country who are the most vulnerable.

Some might call into question the whole nature of what I am saying. Should a Christian publicly challenge the actions of other Christians? Is that not being judgmental?

Not when the integrity of the proclamation of the Gospel is at stake. This practice of dismissing the call to love and protect all of God’s creatures by complying with the health orders — especially the most vulnerable — in the midst of this pandemic needs to be equally strongly challenged for the sake of the Gospel and the integrity of its promise of abundant life for all.

Donald Phillips retired as bishop of the Anglican Diocese of Rupert’s Land of the Anglican Church of Canada in 2018 after for more 18 years in that position.

The Free Press is committed to covering faith in Manitoba through our Religion in the News project. This reporting continues because readers like you step forward to fund it.

Donate now to support our reporting on religion.

Your donation is eligible for a charitable tax receipt. BECOME A FAITH JOURNALISM SUPPORTER

Report Error Submit a Tip

The Free Press acknowledges the financial support it receives from members of the city’s faith community, which makes our coverage of religion possible.

More Stories

AI and the quiet erosion of human judgment

Rod Lastra 5 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

In 1986, Paul Simon sang of “days of miracle and wonder” in the song The Boy in the Bubble, from his Graceland album. It was hardly a hymn to progress. Scientific ingenuity coexisted with violence and vulnerability. The world was becoming more technologically capable but not necessarily wiser.

Four decades later, I find the sentiment difficult to improve upon. Since ChatGPT’s release in November 2022, predictions about AI have arrived in rapid succession. Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, Elon Musk and others in the tech industry’s so-called “broligarchy” have fuelled recent headlines about approaching “superintelligence” and futures ranging from human flourishing to catastrophe. The advances are real but the predictions often carry more confidence than evidence. The future, it seems, is permanently scheduled for an upgrade.

Yet a more immediate question risks being lost — as AI systems become more capable and we delegate increasingly complex work to them, will our capacity to understand, question and oversee their outputs keep pace?

That question begins with understanding what we are delegating. AI is not a single technology. Specialized systems have helped scientists predict protein structures. ChatGPT relies on general-purpose language models trained on vast datasets. The most advanced systems are often called “frontier models”. They can write, translate, analyze and converse across subjects, but fluency does not guarantee accuracy. Success at one task does not establish competence at another.

1 minute read Preview

1 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Jimmy Kimmel: Gov. Gavin Newsom, Emma Roberts, Foo Fighters, Nayanna Holley

Jimmy Fallon: Jamie Lee Curtis, Jamie Campbell Bower, Angèle

Comics Unleashed: Faith Ladzinski, Adam Hunter, Rob Haze, Monty Franklin

Seth Meyers: Sharon Horgan, Justin Hartley

Read
2:00 AM CDT

The importance of political trust

Paul G. Thomas 5 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Political trust refers to people’s positive expectations that the political system, the institutions which comprise it and the actors who participate in its operations will do what they have said they will do, that they will act in the public interest and that they will conduct themselves in a manner which does not disrespect the democratic process.

Political scientists use the terms “diffuse” and “specific” to differentiate between trust in the political system as a whole, and trust in individual actors. Asked to rank occupations in terms of trustworthiness, respondents typically place politicians at or near the bottom of the list. Individuals who have first-hand experience dealing with politicians tend to have more positive viewpoints.

Unfortunately, systematic surveys on trust levels in Manitoba are rare, so any discussion must be based on national results.

Beginning in the late 1960s, a slow erosion of trust in Canadian politicians and political institutions began, with only occasional, short-lived upticks. In the summer of 2025, a national Environics survey found that only a minority of Canadians had a lot of trust in political actors and institutions, such as the political parties and Parliament. The survey report also revealed that trust levels had held steady over the past 15 years.

One-day conference for health-care technology

Free Press staff 1 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

Indigenous leaders and bioscience professionals are gathering this week to promote health-care technology in northern communities.

Bioscience Association Manitoba is hosting its second annual Indigenous Health Innovations conference on Thursday, a day after the World Indigenous Business Forum ends its Winnipeg tenure.

“We fly a lot of people in the North to get access for care for things that technology can actually give them,” said Andrea Ladouceur, Bioscience Association Manitoba’s president.

For example, Manitobans may hop on a plane for a strep throat test when they don’t need to, she said.

Letters, Oct. 27

7 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

Time for ranked ballots?

Re: Get out and exercise your franchise (Editorial, Oct. 24)

Declining turnout is indeed a threat to our democracy and, while I am grateful that the editorial mentioned proportional representation, the issue on the municipal level can be solved far more simply — using ranked-choice voting.

In the last Winnipeg municipal election, the mayor “won” the election with only 27 per cent of the vote. Multiply that by the turnout of 37.5 per cent and the mayor’s positive mandate — the portion of the electorate that voted for him as mayor — drops to a paltry 10 per cent. That number should shock us into an awareness that the single-mark ballot has failed us miserably.

Election results: School trustees 2026

Staff 1 minute read Preview

Election results: School trustees 2026

Staff 1 minute read Friday, Oct. 23, 2026

Below you’ll find live 2026 election results for school trustees in Winnipeg divisions.

We can display results only for wards in which Winnipeg voters cast a ballot; we do not have access to live results reporting for school boards outside of Winnipeg.

 

Read
Friday, Oct. 23, 2026