Dear Herb: What’s the difference between medical and recreational cannabis?

It's a question with social, political, economic and personal implications

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Dear Herb: What is the difference between medical marijuana and recreational marijuana? — Spot the Difference

Read this article for free:


By clicking the button above, an account will be created and you will begin to receive some of our recommended newsletters. You may opt out of any newsletter by visiting your Email and Communication Preferences page or by clicking "unsubscribe" at the bottom of any email.

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $1.44 a week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $5.77 plus GST every four weeks. After 52 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 28/06/2018 (3046 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Dear Herb: What is the difference between medical marijuana and recreational marijuana? — Spot the Difference

Dear Difference: On the one hand, I could argue there’s no difference between "medical marijuana" and "recreational marijuana" — at the end of the day, they’re both cannabis.

On the other hand, there are some significant differences between medical cannabis and recreational cannabis! Confusing, isn’t it?

Herb answers your questions about legal consumption and growing, the law, etiquette — you name it, he'll look into it.
Herb answers your questions about legal consumption and growing, the law, etiquette — you name it, he'll look into it.

To help explain, I called up Paul Armentano, the deputy director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws in the U.S., whose ultimate goal is to legalize "the responsible use of marijuana by adults".

Armentano broke down the differences between medical marijuana and recreational marijuana across a few different categories:

  • A legal distinction: In many jurisdictions, including Canada today, doctor-recommended cannabis for medical use is legal while other cannabis use is illegal.
  • A political distinction: People around the world (and especially in various U.S. states) have distinguished between medical and non-medical cannabis for political purposes. For example, American cannabis advocates have often put medical marijuana legalization initiatives on state ballots, knowing that many people opposed to the idea of legalizing "recreational" marijuana might be more likely to vote in favour of "medical" marijuana on compassionate grounds.
  • An economic distinction: In some places where both medical and recreational cannabis are legal, registered medical cannabis users are exempt from certain taxes. (This won’t be the case in Canada after legalization, as the federal government plans to apply its excise tax to both medical and recreational marijuana. Canadian medical cannabis advocates are asking the federal government to rethink that plan, but so far they haven’t had any luck.)
  • A personal distinction: An individual’s motivations for using cannabis could be considered "medical," "recreational," or both.
  • An analytical distinction: Medical cannabis users might seek out specific strains of marijuana with properties suited to their needs, while recreational users might desire weed with other effects. At the same time, cannabis strains and products associated with "recreation" can absolutely be used for medical purposes, and vice-versa.

Armentano thinks society will distinguish between medical and recreational marijuana for some time to come.

"Because right now, the laws are written in such a way, oftentimes, to emphasize such a distinction," he said.

"And when we look at public support for marijuana reform among the general public, there still remains a disparity with regard to public support for regulating the use of marijuana versus regulating the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes."

The distinction between recreational and medical marijuana is a relatively modern phenomenon directly tied to cannabis prohibition, Armentano argues.

"If you go back historically, you saw human beings largely use cannabis for the same reasons they do today: for therapeutic purposes, for spiritual purposes, for social purposes," he said.

"It’s only been in the era of prohibition that society, and therefore the law, has begun to codify these legal distinctions based on consumers’ motivations."

I’d be remiss if I didn’t note that the term "recreational" itself can be somewhat controversial. (You never hear anyone talking about "recreational wine" or  "recreational cigarettes".) I’ve also heard "recreational" cannabis described as "non-medical" cannabis, "personal use" cannabis, "adult use" cannabis, or "social use" cannabis — personally, I like "adult use" because it implies cannabis is a substance for use by informed, consenting grown-ups.

Finally, not everyone even agrees there should be a distinction between "recreational" and "medical" cannabis. One loyal Dear Herb reader shared their perspective with me a few months ago:

"It’s impossible to use cannabis recreationally," they wrote. "You receive the full medical benefit each time. It doesn’t matter if you were just trying to have fun."

Thanks for the question, Difference. Until next week, may your recreation be medicinal and your medication be recreational.

 

Got a question about cannabis? Herb answers your questions about legal consumption and growing, the law, etiquette — you name it, he’ll look into it.

First, please check this list of questions already answered by Herb. Then, email dearherb@theleafnews.com, or to submit anonymously, fill out the form below. Please include an email address if you’d like to be notified when Herb answers your question:  

(dearHerbForm)

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

A timeline of the WE Charity controversy

The Canadian Press 9 minute read Wednesday, Aug. 19, 2020

OTTAWA - A timeline of events regarding the Canada Student Service Grant program, based on public documents, events and statements from cabinet ministers, government officials, and WE Charity:

March 6, 2020: WE Charity staff prepare a concept paper on service learning for public servants at Employment and Social Development Canada.

April 5: Finance Minister Bill Morneau and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau talk over the phone about how to help students whose summer job and volunteer opportunities were vanishing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Finance Department officials are tasked with considering options the next morning.

April 7: Small Business Minister Mary Ng and WE co-founder Craig Kielburger have an introductory phone call in which Ng asks WE to send what it calls a ``pre-established proposal'' to help young people launch businesses.

Building healthier Canadians

Jason M. Sutherland 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Ottawa is betting that billions of taxpayer dollars spent on steel, asphalt and concrete will secure Canada’s economic future and prosperity. Through the $51 billion Build Communities Strong fund, the federal government is paying for roads, bridges, water systems and transit to boost productivity and attract capital from Europe and Asia.

As the shovels hit the ground from Halifax to Vancouver, Canadians should be asking themselves: What good does it do to build a stronger country if we are not building healthier Canadians?

The fund’s $5 billion allocation for health infrastructure is welcome news, as many of our hospitals and long-term care homes across the country are showing severe signs of aging, and modern care centres are much needed. But pouring concrete for new facilities is not the same as building a healthy population.

A ribbon-cutting at a modern hospital does not guarantee you see a family doctor when you need one, keep a rural emergency department open overnight, or shorten the wait for a knee replacement keeping someone off the job or robbing a retiree of independence.

Wife’s witchy wonderment won’t spell trouble

Maureen Scurfield 6 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My wife believes in magic potions, which used to make me laugh. But since Halloween season started this year, she’s been acting in a way that frightens me. She seems to think she’s a modern-day “witch.” Give me a break!

Now she has three friends who think they are really casting spells when they get together! And this year on Halloween night she’s being formally accepted into their little witchy group meeting at one of their homes, and is getting a new sorceress name. It’s creepy! How do I cope? I’ve had enough of this.

— Seriously Upset, South St. Vital

Dear Upset: Don’t buy into the hocus pocus by being afraid of it and expressing any trepidation to your wife. She needs you to be strong, so she knows she has a solid anchor and can drop out of this witchy group if it becomes too scary or silly for her.

Westman to lose sole medical oncologist

Rylee Gerrard 5 minute read Preview

Westman to lose sole medical oncologist

Rylee Gerrard 5 minute read Updated: 9:26 AM CDT

BRANDON — Western Manitoba is about to lose its only medical oncologist, leaving just 22 in the province — all of whom are in Winnipeg.

Brandon West MLA Wayne Balcaen raised the issue during question period Thursday, saying the departure of Dr. Brady Anderson will be a “major loss” for the region.

After four years working out of the Western Manitoba Cancer Centre in Brandon, Anderson’s last day will be Nov. 13.

“He literally sees hundreds of patients within the Westman area, and now those individuals will have to travel to Winnipeg to get that personal service,” Balcaen said, calling Anderson’s impending departure “catastrophic.”

Read
Updated: 9:26 AM CDT

The volatile U.S. midterms

Allan Levine 5 minute read Preview

The volatile U.S. midterms

Allan Levine 5 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

The last time the Democratic Party had 218 or more seats — the number required to control the U.S. House of Representatives — was from 2021 to 2023, following the election of Democrat Joe Biden as president. During that same period, the Democrats also had the edge in the Senate. Despite a 50-50 split with the Republicans, Democrats were able to control the Senate with the help of Vice-President Kamala Harris, who cast the key vote in a tie. From 2023 to 2025, the Democrats had a slim 51 to 49 Senate majority.

If history repeats itself and the latest polls are fairly accurate, on Tuesday, Nov. 3, the Democratic Party will take back the House and (probably) the Senate from the Republicans, who have controlled both legislative bodies since the 2024 election. In the House, the Democrats have to gain at least three more seats. In the Senate, they have to win four more, which is entirely doable, though they almost certainly have to win a seat in Texas, Ohio, Kansas or Alaska, each of which currently has two Republican senators.

The prospect of a Democratic victory has President Donald Trump in a tizzy. For the past two years, he has abused his executive power to impose illegal tariffs on Canada and other countries; started a war with Iran; cozied up to Russian president Vladimir Putin and turned his back on Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy; and increased the national debt through questionable tax cuts — to list only a few of his more egregious actions. He has been able to get away with this mainly because Republicans in the Senate and the House refuse to even question his decisions.

With the Democrats in charge, Trump’s brazen actions won’t be completely halted, but he will face significant legislative challenges and obstacles not easily dismissed. His controversial appointees, such as Attorney General Todd Blanche, who perceives himself as Trump’s private lawyer rather than the legal representative of the people, won’t get a free pass in committee hearings.

Read
2:00 AM CDT

Fact Check

1 minute read Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023

Fact Check

Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly |