How risky is flying during the coronavirus pandemic?

Advertisement

Advertise with us

How risky is flying during the coronavirus pandemic?

Read this article for free:


By clicking the button above, an account will be created and you will begin to receive some of our recommended newsletters. You may opt out of any newsletter by visiting your Email and Communication Preferences page or by clicking "unsubscribe" at the bottom of any email.

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $1.44 a week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $5.77 plus GST every four weeks. After 52 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 30/06/2020 (2306 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

How risky is flying during the coronavirus pandemic?

Flying can increase your risk of exposure to infection, but airlines are taking some precautions and you can too.

Air travel means spending time in security lines and airport terminals, which puts you into close contact with other people. As travel slowly recovers, planes are becoming more crowded, which means you will likely sit close to other people, often for hours, which raises your risk.

Illustration by Peter Hamlin.;
Illustration by Peter Hamlin.;

Once on a plane, most viruses and other germs don’t spread easily because of the way air circulates, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Airlines also say they are focusing on sanitizing the hard surfaces that passengers commonly touch.

Some airlines like Alaska, Delta, JetBlue and Southwest are blocking middle seats or limiting capacity. But even if every middle seat is empty you will likely be closer than the recommended distance of 6 feet to another passenger now that planes are getting fuller.

American, United and Spirit are now booking flights to full capacity when they can. All leading U.S. airlines require passengers to wear masks. Lauren Ancel Meyers, an expert in disease outbreaks at the University of Texas, says that can help limit risk.

For air travel, and all other types of transportation, the CDC recommends washing your hands, maintaining social distancing and wearing face coverings.

Several airlines announced Monday that they will ask passengers about possible COVID-19 symptoms and whether they have been in contact with someone who tested positive for the virus in the previous two weeks.

Still, Meyers said you still might consider whether you need to be on that plane. “We should all be in the mindset of ‘only if necessary’ and always taking the most precautions we can to protect ourselves and others,” she said.

___

The AP is answering your questions about the coronavirus in this series. Submit them at: FactCheck@AP.org.

Read previous Viral Questions:

Who would be the first to get a COVID-19 vaccine?

Is it safe to form a COVID-19 “support bubble” with friends?

Is it safe to stay in hotels as reopenings get underway?

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Asylum claim rise needs response: IRB

Stephanie Levitz, The Canadian Press 4 minute read Preview

Asylum claim rise needs response: IRB

Stephanie Levitz, The Canadian Press 4 minute read Wednesday, Mar. 22, 2017

OTTAWA - The Immigration and Refugee Board is doing its best to cope with a growing number of asylum claims in Canada, but the federal Liberals must take action as well before an unmanageable backlog gets created, the head of the IRB says.

The rapid pace of the increase in new claims sees the board — an independent tribunal that decides on immigration and refugee cases in Canada — potentially on track to receive 30,000 claims this year — triple the number lodged before it just four years ago.

"There is a limit to what you can do ..." said IRB chairman Mario Dion of his agency's efforts in an interview with The Canadian Press.

"Efficiency has increased significantly, but there is no way we can deal with 30,000 cases when we're funded for about 17,000."

Read
Wednesday, Mar. 22, 2017

Don’t let good health reforms fade or fossilize

Alan Menkis 5 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

When Canada’s health ministers left Winnipeg on Oct. 16, they took with them a promise to keep talking. The federal health minister did not commit to long-term funding. She offered one-year extensions for programs that were about to run out, and asked officials to begin work on “the next 10 years.”

The provinces, in the words of Manitoba Health Minister Uzoma Asagwara, wanted to avoid “fiscal cliffs” and needed “predictable, stable, sustainable funding.”

Both sides have a point. And both are talking almost entirely about money — how much, for how long, under what formula.

Missing from the conversation is the question that decides whether any of it works — once the money flows, who must answer for what it does, or does not, achieve? We have been here before. In 2002, a Senate committee chaired by Michael Kirby warned that new federal money “must be used to buy change, not merely to support the system as it is presently structured.” It proposed an independent national health care commissioner, reporting every year to the public on how the system and the health of Canadians were faring.

Start date of Phase 2 yet to be finalized; public, business, industry asked for input

Carol Sanders 9 minute read Preview

Start date of Phase 2 yet to be finalized; public, business, industry asked for input

Carol Sanders 9 minute read Thursday, May. 21, 2020

Manitoba has unveiled a sweeping plan to reopen more sectors earlier than projected, giving the green light to bars, pools, splash pads, gyms, rinks, tattoo parlours, estheticians, and travel to tourist destinations north of the 53rd parallel.

"Early and decisive actions, along with the hard work of Manitobans have made a difference in our fight against COVID-19, and I want to thank Team Manitoba for all you've done," Premier Brian Pallister said during a Thursday morning teleconference.

The months of handwashing and handwringing Manitobans have been doing to prevent the spread of the novel coronavirus are paying off, officials said.

On May 4, outdoor restaurant patios, hair salons, playgrounds, elective surgery and health services such as physiotherapy were allowed to resume under Phase 1 of Manitoba's reopening plan.

Read
Thursday, May. 21, 2020

Letters, Oct. 23

7 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

People over cars — always

Re: Researchers: lights at crossing ‘long overdue’ (Oct. 22)

Maggie Macintosh’s article was right on the mark. The biggest problem with pedestrian crossings is the remarkable inconsistency, but there is also the fact that drivers at every traffic light are trained to keep running through amber lights until they turn to red.

I use the pedestrian crossing at Roblin Boulevard and Hunterspoint Road and drive through it every day. Almost every day I see drivers, from a full block away, who will just keep going through the flashing ambers (at the crossing), especially if there is traffic ahead of them doing the same thing.

Rocky Horror star prepared for a rude reception in all the best ways

Conrad Sweatman 5 minute read Preview

Rocky Horror star prepared for a rude reception in all the best ways

Conrad Sweatman 5 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

While it enjoys the longest theatrical release of any movie in history, The Rocky Horror Picture Show was all but ignored by critics when its revolutionary brand of camp first hit silver screens in 1975.

And before it whipped up a cult following, Rocky was a fringe theatre hit in London whose first run’s final night — which had attracted such luminaries as Mick and Bianca Jagger — was derailed by an unlikely culprit: glitter. According to the late Tim Curry (who died at 80 in August), the shiny stuff ended up where the sun don’t shine.

“Well, Rocky got some glitter down his trunks and it set up an irritation. When we arrived at the theatre, he was standing in the shower and the show couldn’t go on,” he told the press in 1974, after crossing the Atlantic to lead the show’s American theatre debut.

Glitter is one of the things audiences may not throw at the stage at The Rocky Horror Picture Show screening tonight at the Centennial Concert Hall. Unlike in the anarchic midnight screenings at the New York’s Waverly Theater beginning in 1976, where audiences chucked everything but the kitchen sink, a prop bag will be courteously supplied at the door.

Read
2:01 AM CDT

Most incumbents regain their seats… but not all

Kevin Rollason 8 minute read Preview

Most incumbents regain their seats… but not all

Kevin Rollason 8 minute read Thursday, Oct. 27, 2022

When it comes to civic elections, voters like incumbents — but that doesn’t mean they are always invincible.

Read
Thursday, Oct. 27, 2022