Christians protesting public health orders misguided

Advertisement

Advertise with us

As Canadians grow increasingly weary of public health order restrictions and frustrated by the continual infringement on their daily lives, some churches are pushing back against being denied the opportunity to gather together to worship.

Read this article for free:


By clicking the button above, an account will be created and you will begin to receive some of our recommended newsletters. You may opt out of any newsletter by visiting your Email and Communication Preferences page or by clicking "unsubscribe" at the bottom of any email.

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $1.44 a week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $5.77 plus GST every four weeks. After 52 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 12/05/2021 (1996 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

As Canadians grow increasingly weary of public health order restrictions and frustrated by the continual infringement on their daily lives, some churches are pushing back against being denied the opportunity to gather together to worship.

A few of these churches have found unlikely allies in those who are constantly wary of governments trying to limit individual citizen’s personal rights. Most recently, this “alliance” has resulted in legal challenges in the courts asserting that public health orders violate charter-protected freedoms of conscience, religion, expression and peaceful assembly.

While they might believe they are acting in the best interests of Christian discipleship and God’s call, they are misguided on several fronts.

JOHN WOODS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS Church of God minister Tobias Tissen speaks at an anti-mask rally at the Forks. A group of anti-maskers gathered at the Forks for a rally in Winnipeg Sunday, April 25, 2021. Reporter: ?
JOHN WOODS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS Church of God minister Tobias Tissen speaks at an anti-mask rally at the Forks. A group of anti-maskers gathered at the Forks for a rally in Winnipeg Sunday, April 25, 2021. Reporter: ?

One of the pastors involved is quoted as saying, “We have no authority, scripturally based and based on Christian convictions, to limit anyone from coming to hear the word of God. We have no authority to tell people you can’t come to church. That’s in God’s jurisdiction.”

The New Testament presents quite a different picture of the responsibility of the Church for itself. The first example of this is in Matthew’s Gospel.

When Peter is given the revelation about who Jesus truly is, Jesus begins to share God’s authority with the disciples. “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven,” he said. (Matt. 16:19)

This authority is not limited to Peter. The same authority is given to the gathered assembly of Christ’s disciples. (Matthew 18:18)

Much of the content of the New Testament Epistles, particularly those written by Paul, confronts and admonishes churches to teach, direct and sometimes even discipline their members so as to not hinder or distort the mission of the Gospel in the world and Christ’s command to his Church.

What is that Gospel? It is the supreme command of Jesus Christ “to love one another as I (Jesus) have loved you.”

In 1 Corinthians chapter 9, Paul outlines the many ways in which he sacrifices his own self, his rights and privileges, his freedom in Christ, in order to effectively witness to the love of Christ. “I have become all things to all people, that I might by all means save some,” he said. (I Cor. 9:22)

For the Christian disciple, the effective demonstration and proclamation of the love of God for all people must take precedence over any personal demand or freedom. This is what it means to serve the Lord. The New Testament even uses the stronger term “slave” to describe a Christian’s devotion to Christ.

Another pastor was quoted as saying, “We are here to fight for God. We are here to defend the vulnerable.”

The vulnerable we need to be worried about are those being exposed to COVID-19 by people not following the public health orders. It is those languishing on ventilators in ICUs in hospitals across our country who are the most vulnerable.

Some might call into question the whole nature of what I am saying. Should a Christian publicly challenge the actions of other Christians? Is that not being judgmental?

Not when the integrity of the proclamation of the Gospel is at stake. This practice of dismissing the call to love and protect all of God’s creatures by complying with the health orders — especially the most vulnerable — in the midst of this pandemic needs to be equally strongly challenged for the sake of the Gospel and the integrity of its promise of abundant life for all.

Donald Phillips retired as bishop of the Anglican Diocese of Rupert’s Land of the Anglican Church of Canada in 2018 after for more 18 years in that position.

The Free Press is committed to covering faith in Manitoba through our Religion in the News project. This reporting continues because readers like you step forward to fund it.

Donate now to support our reporting on religion.

Your donation is eligible for a charitable tax receipt. BECOME A FAITH JOURNALISM SUPPORTER

Report Error Submit a Tip

The Free Press acknowledges the financial support it receives from members of the city’s faith community, which makes our coverage of religion possible.

More Stories

All election results for Councillors and Mayor

Staff 1 minute read Monday, Oct. 26, 2026

This is the Mayor results.

These are all the Councillors.

Councillor for Charleswood – Tuxedo – Westwood

Councillor for Daniel McIntyre

NDP introduces last-minute rent-hike bill, Tories say it will cause administrative nightmare

Carol Sanders 4 minute read Preview

NDP introduces last-minute rent-hike bill, Tories say it will cause administrative nightmare

Carol Sanders 4 minute read 7:29 PM CDT

A day before the legislative session ends, the NDP government introduced a bill to ensure landlords can’t charge tenants backpay for approved above-guideline rent increases.

Bill 59, the Residential Tenancies Amendment Act (2), would prohibit a landlord who has applied for a rent increase above the maximum permitted by regulation from charging tenants the new rate until it is approved.

Premier Wab Kinew announced earlier this month that renters would not have to pay the increases until the provincial Residential Tenancies Branch hears landlords’ arguments and issues its decisions.

“We recently passed legislation in the house to make sure life will be more affordable,” Kinew said at a news conference on Oct. 20, referring to a new rent bill introduced in March and expected to become law before the session ends on Oct. 29. He was flanked by Winnipeg tenants facing rent increases of more than 50 per cent.

Read
7:29 PM CDT

Opportunity knocks, and we must answer

Adrian Deer 5 minute read Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

Imagine being a young athlete who loves volleyball but attends a school without a net or even a ball.

For many students in Winnipeg, access to basic sporting equipment is something they rarely think about.

However, during my visit to Red Sucker Lake First Nation in northern Manitoba, I witnessed a very different reality. The local school did not have volleyball nets or balls. As someone who has had the opportunity to compete in volleyball across Canada and internationally, this experience made me realize how easily we take these opportunities for granted.

How can we expect young Indigenous athletes to discover their potential when they don’t even have the basic equipment needed to play? Talent and determination can exist in every community but without access to opportunities, that potential may never be realized.

Man accused of assaulting unconscious woman has lengthy record of abuse

Erik Pindera 5 minute read Preview

Man accused of assaulting unconscious woman has lengthy record of abuse

Erik Pindera 5 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

A convicted sex offender accused of sexually assaulting an unconscious woman last week — only to be stopped in the process by police officers — has a lengthy history of abusing vulnerable victims.

Harley Aaron Okemow, 34, was arrested Oct. 21 on Stanley Street, near Henry Avenue, and charged with sexual assault causing bodily harm.

He had been released from provincial jail in mid-September, with a sentence of two years of supervised probation plus the time he served behind bars awaiting court, after pleading guilty to several breaches of court orders committed earlier this year.

“Mr. Okemow … does have a serious record … that includes sexually offending against six different victims, five of which were children,” said Crown prosecutor Katie Dojack at Okemow’s sentencing last month.

Read
Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

AI and the quiet erosion of human judgment

Rod Lastra 5 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

In 1986, Paul Simon sang of “days of miracle and wonder” in the song The Boy in the Bubble, from his Graceland album. It was hardly a hymn to progress. Scientific ingenuity coexisted with violence and vulnerability. The world was becoming more technologically capable but not necessarily wiser.

Four decades later, I find the sentiment difficult to improve upon. Since ChatGPT’s release in November 2022, predictions about AI have arrived in rapid succession. Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, Elon Musk and others in the tech industry’s so-called “broligarchy” have fuelled recent headlines about approaching “superintelligence” and futures ranging from human flourishing to catastrophe. The advances are real but the predictions often carry more confidence than evidence. The future, it seems, is permanently scheduled for an upgrade.

Yet a more immediate question risks being lost — as AI systems become more capable and we delegate increasingly complex work to them, will our capacity to understand, question and oversee their outputs keep pace?

That question begins with understanding what we are delegating. AI is not a single technology. Specialized systems have helped scientists predict protein structures. ChatGPT relies on general-purpose language models trained on vast datasets. The most advanced systems are often called “frontier models”. They can write, translate, analyze and converse across subjects, but fluency does not guarantee accuracy. Success at one task does not establish competence at another.

Lula’s historic Brazilian election victory

Peter McKenna 5 minute read Preview

Lula’s historic Brazilian election victory

Peter McKenna 5 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

This was supposed to go down as one of the closest presidential elections in Brazilian history — until it wasn’t. In the end, 80-year-old leftist President Luiz Inácio (Lula) da Silva of the Workers Party bested (by some four million votes) Flávio Bolsonaro, the hard-right Liberal Party leader and senator, by a lopsided 3.5 per cent of the popular vote.

Speaking of Brazilian history, it rarely happens that the second-place finisher in the first round ends up winning the second, run-off contest in such a decisive manner. More significant, Lula has now won an unprecedented (non-consecutive) fourth term as an elected Brazilian president.

While Bolsonaro has waffled on making a concession speech (like his father in 2022), the writing on the wall shows clearly that he lost badly. He has evidently taken issue with a ruling by a justice of the Supreme Court that extended polling hours country-wide by an additional two hours in light of high voter turnout and other interruptions.

Flávio’s supporters, many galvanized around the “never Lula” camp, were desperate for change — even if it meant the kind of change that could turn Brazil on its head. So Lula resorted to one of the oldest political tricks in the campaign handbook — namely, using fear of an anti-democratic Bolsonaro to swing voters to his side (along with a host of last-minute announcements involving financial incentives to Brazilians). With a right-leaning Congress, voters were understandably worried that Flávio would go about systematically dismantling Brazil’s democratic ethos and institutions.

Read
Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT