Parliament to sit again to approve more COVID-19 relief as spending climbs

Advertisement

Advertise with us

OTTAWA - Parliamentarians will soon find themselves voting anew on spending measures to help the country to combat the financial fallout from COVID-19 — help that is going to cost the federal treasury at least $95 billion — as the result of changes the Liberals have promised in recent days.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 01/04/2020 (2372 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

OTTAWA – Parliamentarians will soon find themselves voting anew on spending measures to help the country to combat the financial fallout from COVID-19 — help that is going to cost the federal treasury at least $95 billion — as the result of changes the Liberals have promised in recent days.

Conservatives criticized the Liberals for not getting their plans right the first time; the Bloc Quebecois criticized them for bowing to Conservative demands and limiting their own freedom to deal with changing circumstances.

It was just last week that Parliament hastily passed a suite of spending and lending to help businesses and workers affected by the pandemic, in a special sitting with only a handful of MPs.

Minister of Finance Bill Morneau responds to a question during a news conference in Ottawa, Friday, March 27, 2020. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld
Minister of Finance Bill Morneau responds to a question during a news conference in Ottawa, Friday, March 27, 2020. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

On Wednesday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he’s planning to have MPs and senators come back for another sitting to pass additional items in what he described as perhaps the biggest economic bailout and social program this country has ever seen.

The legislation created a 10 per cent wage subsidy for small businesses, but officials briefing reporters about a new 75 per cent subsidy program said the bailout bill didn’t include the expanded program.

The Liberals didn’t put a timeline on when Parliament will be recalled — a process that, under the practice used last time, will require picking a small group of parliamentarians to review and vote on measures.

“The magnitude of the measures that we know are necessary means that it would be a good idea to bring Parliament back to work on them,” Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said during a midday press conference.

Opposition parties will have a chance to hear more from Finance Minister Bill Morneau when he appears Thursday afternoon in a teleconference meeting of the House of Commons finance committee.

Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer said his party is ready to amend the law, but argued the problem shouldn’t have happened in the first place.

The Tories objected to a clause that would have given the Liberals the power to spend and tax without parliamentary approval through to December 2021, which the Liberals ultimately backed down on.

“Instead of focusing on legislation to help businesses get through this crisis, they spent their time focusing on a massive power grab to give themselves new and unprecedented powers,” Scheer said during a press conference in his home city of Regina.

In a statement, Bloc Quebecois Leader Yves-Francois Blanchet said the wage subsidy would have been part of the original bill if not for Tories who asked for its removal.

He asked the government to provide the wording of the new bill to all parliamentarians and that the parties agree on the final text before anyone travels to Ottawa.

The new subsidy will cost $71 billion while a direct benefit to out-of-work Canadians will cost about $24 billion, Morneau said in his own news conference Wednesday. The combined measures bring direct financial aid for the economic crisis to more than $105 billion, he said. On top of that is $85 billion in tax deferrals for individuals and businesses, and $65 billion in loans.

Companies that qualify for the larger wage subsidy will need to show at least a 30 per cent drop in revenues due to COVID-19 compared to the same month last year — or a more recent month for a reasonable comparison for a business that is less than a year old, like a startup.

For charities and non-profits, some eligibility details are still being worked out, officials said.

Employers receiving the benefit can be of any size, but can’t be publicly funded, and recipients will be expected do whatever they can to pay the remaining 25 per cent of their employees’ wages.

Officials said it will take between three and six weeks to flow funding that will be capped at $847 per employee, per week.

The Canadian Federation of Independent Business said several design features and unanswered questions may prevent the program from meeting its goal of reducing layoffs.

“If employers are not able to know with certainty whether they will qualify for the subsidy, many will be forced to lay off workers,” CFIB president Dan Kelly said in a statement.

Any worker who receives the wage subsidy can’t also receive a $2,000-a-month emergency benefit that requires an eligible recipient to not be earning any money.

Kevin Milligan, a University of British Columbia economics professor, wrote this week that the government will have to consider how to use the benefit to help those with a severe drop in earnings, as well as students.

His report for the C.D. Howe Institute said “more policy work is needed to fortify” the benefit so it can fully help “bridge our economy across the crisis.”

Applications open April 6 for those born in the first quarter of the calendar year, between January and the end of March. Workers with birthdays in the second quarter can apply April 7, those born in the third quarter on April 8 and those born in the final three months of the year on April 9.

The schedule was designed to avoid overwhelming already taxed systems.

In the last two weeks, some 2.1 million people have applied for employment insurance benefits, Employment Minister Carla Qualtrough said —a number dramatically higher than what the program normally sees. Federal workers have processed more than 430,000 claims, and a new system being implemented Wednesday will help quickly address the backlog, Qualtrough said.

Those approved for EI will be automatically moved over to the new benefit.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 1, 2020.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Titanic model an unexpected gift of unsinkable memories of my dad

Melissa Martin 7 minute read Preview

Titanic model an unexpected gift of unsinkable memories of my dad

Melissa Martin 7 minute read Thursday, Jun. 18, 2020

When I was a little girl, I became briefly obsessed with nautical disasters. It was an early sign of what would become a lifelong fixation with how people behave in moments of crisis: the men who gave up their spot on the lifeboat. The men who forced their way on. The captain who watched his ship die, and stood firm.

In the midst of this obsession, my father, cheerfully unruffled by the macabre tenor of his youngest daughter’s new interest, brought home a model Titanic, one of those paint-your-own kits they sell at hobby stores. We spent hours working on it at the dining room table, dabbing brushes in tiny pots of paint while I rattled off Titanic facts.

“Dad, did you know the ship broke in two pieces when it sank?”

With a few careful brush strokes, a miniature plastic propeller is clad in silver.

Read
Thursday, Jun. 18, 2020

Plenty of losses all around

Gwynne Dyer 4 minute read Wednesday, Jul. 15, 2026

The last time oil-tankers were being shot up in the Persian Gulf, back in the 1980s, it was Saddam Hussein’s brutal tyranny in Iraq versus Ayatollah Khomeini’s revolutionary Islamist regime in Iran.

The United States backed Saddam because he was just another murderous thug, whereas the new regime in Tehran was an actual threat to American interests. It had overthrown Iran’s American-backed puppet king and wanted to spread its Islamist ideology across the region.

So, of course, Ronald Reagan’s administration chose Saddam’s side. It sent Iraq arms by clandestine means (because Congress wouldn’t authorize it) and even provided targeting information for Iraqi poison gas attacks on Iran. The Americans chose the “lesser evil,” but at least they knew it was evil.

Once in a while they would even say it out loud, quoting U.S. diplomat Henry Kissinger: “It’s a shame that both sides can’t lose.” But they never did anything about it, and after eight years of slaughter, the war ended in a no-score draw.

Province helping youths leaving CFS system with three-month EIA ‘unconditional income’

Nicole Buffie 3 minute read Preview

Province helping youths leaving CFS system with three-month EIA ‘unconditional income’

Nicole Buffie 3 minute read Yesterday at 4:29 PM CDT

The province is making it easier for youths transitioning out of care to access employment income assistance.

Conditions on benefits will be waived for three months, to create a “time-limited, unconditional income,” Families Minister Nahanni Fontaine said Monday.

The changes will allow for direct enrolment on income assistance upon aging out of care, Fontaine said.

“The data tells us young adults exiting care disproportionately experience homelessness and insecure housing,” she said. “Financial insecurity is a key contributor to housing insecurity.”

Read
Yesterday at 4:29 PM CDT

Night terrors

AV Kitching 7 minute read Preview

Night terrors

AV Kitching 7 minute read Monday, Oct. 20, 2025

Before we go any further, let me just unequivocally state: Six Pines is not for the weak.

I was so terrified my mind has effectively erased the entire experience.

I shall do my best to give you a comprehensive, cohesive review of the night my friend and I visited, but please forgive the lack of detail.

What you are about to read are snatches of memories, dragged kicking and screaming from the depths of my fear-addled brain, which is, even as I type, trying to block all attempts of retrieval.

Read
Monday, Oct. 20, 2025

Roughing it (less)

AV Kitching 6 minute read Preview

Roughing it (less)

AV Kitching 6 minute read Monday, Jul. 6, 2026

I hate camping.

I loathe the very idea of leaving the comfort and safety of home to sleep in a random field, where not only will I be exposed to the elements, but will also be at the mercy of all manner of creatures, from ursine to canine to insectan.

I do not want to hike up a hill just to share one outdoor tap with 12 others, standing alongside them as I brush my teeth.

I do not want to queue for 15 minutes, then part with a $2 coin to wedge myself into a shower stall just to stand under a piddly stream of lukewarm water while trying my best to swiftly soap up and sponge off lest I irk the rapidly growing line of campers outside.

Read
Monday, Jul. 6, 2026

Enlist landlord to turn down neighbours’ volume

Maureen Scurfield Miss Lonelyhearts 3 minute read Tuesday, Apr. 19, 2022

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My side-by-side duplex neighbour sings loud, horrible duets with his girlfriend. She sings in a screechy soprano, and he bangs on the piano, and attempts to “harmonize” with her.

It’s just painful. We can hear them clearly through our cheap walls. For some reason, they get inspired late at night. Then they can go for up to an hour “singing” together. It’s endless when you’re trying to go to sleep and have to work in the morning. We figure they must be hitting the bottle.

I end up having to bang on the wall and swear at the top of my lungs to shut them up. Last night the guy banged back, and yelled through the wall, “What’s your problem, you idiot? Why don’t you come over here!”

Should I go see them? My girlfriend wants me to shut down their singing for good, no matter what it takes.