Fanatics and a fool

Advertisement

Advertise with us

We don’t have to look very far to find a useful historical analogy for the current crisis in the Middle East. In 1967 Egypt closed the Strait of Tiran to Israeli ships, and Israel replied with a surprise air attack that destroyed almost the entire Egyptian air force on the ground.

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Monthly Digital Subscription

$1 per week for 24 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

Monthly Digital Subscription

$4.99/week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

We don’t have to look very far to find a useful historical analogy for the current crisis in the Middle East. In 1967 Egypt closed the Strait of Tiran to Israeli ships, and Israel replied with a surprise air attack that destroyed almost the entire Egyptian air force on the ground.

Israel followed up with a ground offensive that reached the Suez Canal — which then remained closed for the next eight years. Could something like this happen at the Strait of Hormuz now? Of course it could. In fact, at this point in the confrontation in the gulf, it will require a great deal of forbearance on both sides to avoid it.

Unfortunately, forbearance is a virtue conspicuously absent on either side. U.S. President Donald Trump let himself be talked into a surprise “decapitation” attack on Iran by his partner, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanhyahu, but it did not deliver the promised results. Dozens of Iranian leaders were killed, but the regime did not collapse.

So now Trump is desperately looking for a way to get out of the war he started without losing face, but his only available method for putting pressure on Iran is endless escalation. Israel, meanwhile, is determined to press on until the entire Iranian regime — or if necessary Iran’s whole economy — is destroyed.

And while the United States and Israel must bear the main responsibility for this increasingly bloody mess, Iran is also behaving badly.

Many of the surviving Iranian leaders have lost close family members in what can reasonably be called a treacherous American attack (the U.S. was in the midst of negotiations with Iran). Now they believe that their control of the Strait of Hormuz gives them the upper hand in the struggle, and they are in a vengeful mood.

Despite Trump’s ludicrous claims to the contrary, there is no deal on the table, no meaningful negotiations of any kind underway. The Iranian leaders who are in power now are only there because the Americans and Israelis killed everybody more senior than them. They want to watch their enemies twist in the wind for a while before they deign to talk to them.

This is almost as childish and brutal as Trump’s threat to “unleash hell” on Iran if its leaders do not bend to his will, and that is not an empty threat. He has promised to destroy Iran’s electrical power industry, its oil and gas resources, even its desalination facilities. That will mean no electricity, no income and precious little water for a country of 92 million people.

Iran has made counter threats of the same sort, except that the United States is beyond its reach and so instead it promises to inflict the same misery on America’s regional allies: Saudi Arabia, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and of course Israel.

Are the Iranians willing to accept the wholesale destruction of their country’s economy in exchange for doing only major damage in return — especially when that damage is mostly being done to Israel’s and America’s local allies, not to the perpetrators themselves?

The wisest course would be to stop now, but nobody in this game is showing much wisdom.

The people making decisions in Iran are grief-stricken true believers who think it is their religious duty to oppose evil at any cost. Yielding to the demands of the Great Satan is unthinkable, however grave the consequences of resistance may be.

Netanyahu is not fanatical, but he is obsessive. He first warned Israelis that Iran was “three to five years” away from getting nuclear weapons in 1992. He issued the same warning in 1995 (“three to five years”), in 1996 (“extremely close”), 2012 (“a few months”), 2015, 2018, 2023 and 2025. This year he finally got somebody to listen, although Iran still has no nuclear weapons.

And Trump is beside himself with rage and fear, posting on Truth Social: “Open the (F—-n’) Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell — JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah. President Donald J. Trump.”

Trump knows he has been suckered into Netanyahu’s war, and he sees defeat looming in the mid-term election this November. The only exit he can see is a military victory that grows less likely by the day. Escalation is his only hope, and we all know where that can end.

Gwynne Dyer’s new book is Intervention Earth: Life-Saving Ideas from the World’s Climate Engineers.

Report Error Submit a Tip

Analysis

LOAD ANALYSIS ARTICLES