WEATHER ALERT

Opinion

It’s RRSP season again — is it worth additions amid other ways to save?

Joel Schlesinger 6 minute read Preview

It’s RRSP season again — is it worth additions amid other ways to save?

Joel Schlesinger 6 minute read Saturday, Feb. 7, 2026

Canadians have great tools to save tax-deferred or tax-free for the future — and the granddaddy of them all is the registered retirement savings plan.

The calendar now turned to February, RRSPs are on the minds of many, with the March 2 deadline looming for the last contributions for 2025.

Yet in the context of the other ways to save — the tax-free savings account (TFSA) and the newer, first home savings account (FHSA) — the RRSP is not always the most attractive place to park, invest and grow money.

The ideal is to fund all of these savings vehicles, based on need, to their annual maximums.

Read
Saturday, Feb. 7, 2026

Letters, Feb. 27

7 minute read 2:13 PM CST

Questionable adviceRe: City report recommends reducing residential speed limit to 40 km/h (Feb. 25)

Although I may agree that a reduced speed limit on side streets in residential neighborhoods to 40 km/h would be appropriate, I question Jino Distasio’s conclusion that the average speed driven on residential streets is 36 km/h telling us the speed limit is too high.

He is apparently an expert in urban studies, but he certainly isn’t an expert in mathematics. If you leave one end of your street from a dead stop and get up to 50 km/h at some point and then come to a dead stop at the end of your street at the stop sign, your average speed will certainly be less than 50km/ h.

I hope our city council isn’t relying on this expert’s advice and can see through the errors in the conclusion, but I’m not holding out hope.

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Weather

WEATHER ALERT Feb. 27, 12 AM: -5°c Cloudy with wind Feb. 27, 6 AM: 1°c Cloudy with wind

Winnipeg MB

-3°C, Cloudy

Full Forecast

HASSAN AMMAR / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES

This week, U.S. President Donald Trump said Connor Hellebuyck would receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

HASSAN AMMAR / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES
                                This week, U.S. President Donald Trump said Connor Hellebuyck would receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Jets goaltender displays insulting, medal-winning lack of awareness

Tom Brodbeck 5 minute read Preview

Jets goaltender displays insulting, medal-winning lack of awareness

Tom Brodbeck 5 minute read 1:34 PM CST

Connor Hellebuyck is an extraordinary goaltender. On the ice, his excellence is indisputable.

Off the ice, however, the Winnipeg Jets starting goaltender faltered this week, not by accident, not by association, but by choice.

His decision to attend U.S. President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address and to publicly emote over Trump’s announcement that he would receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom was a political act. And it deserves to be treated as such.

Some of Hellebuyck’s teammates, some fans and defenders have rushed to construct a comforting narrative: that this was merely an expression of American pride, that Hellebuyck served his country in international hockey, that he is therefore deserving of recognition from the highest office in the land. It is a tidy story. It is also a false one.

Read
1:34 PM CST

The Associated Press

U.S. President Donald Trump and his Secretary of Treasury, Scott Bessent, seem eager to tamper in Canada’s internal affairs — but to what end?

The Associated Press
                                U.S. President Donald Trump and his Secretary of Treasury, Scott Bessent, seem eager to tamper in Canada’s internal affairs — but to what end?

Trump plays games with Canada’s sovereignty

Peter McKenna 5 minute read Preview

Trump plays games with Canada’s sovereignty

Peter McKenna 5 minute read 2:01 AM CST

What in God’s name is U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent doing commenting publicly about sensitive national unity matters in Canada?

It is unprecedented, intrusive and highly provocative behaviour from a senior Trump Administration official. There is no disputing the fact that Bessent has clearly gone well beyond the bilateral red lines and rules of the erstwhile Canada-U.S. “diplomatic culture.”

There has almost always been an unwritten understanding that neither country should openly interfere in the internal affairs of their neighbour. Politicians and officials on both sides of the border knew that nothing good would ever come from interjecting themselves into the cut and thrust of domestic political happenings.

Now and again, some low-ranking U.S. official, member of Congress, dim party staffer or newspaper columnist would pontificate about the likely dismemberment of Canada. It was a rarity, however, for any U.S. president (outside of Bill Clinton interjecting himself into the 1995 Quebec referendum) or senior cabinet secretary to opine about Canada’s national unity situation.

Read
2:01 AM CST

Put hot conference affair in rear-view mirror

Maureen Scurfield 5 minute read 2:01 AM CST

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: I met an exciting woman at a conference in Winnipeg and took her everywhere to show her the sights. But since she has gone home to her own province, she has virtually disappeared.

She took a lot of photos of me, but she didn’t want photos taken of her. Only a dummy like me wouldn’t have noticed that she wasn’t leaving her footprint. She also took phone calls away from our dinner or bar tables. I thought they were business calls, but now I know better.

I realize now she was able to fool me because she seemed so interested in me and my life, and I was answering all her questions. I felt very important. What a fool I was!

I just found out about her other life with the help of a friend. It helps to know the truth, but it doesn’t erase the pain of falling head-over-heels only to find out you were used for fun by an out-of-towner just here for some laughs.

The Canadian Press files

Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre

The Canadian Press files
                                Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre

Is it time for a look in the mirror?

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

Is it time for a look in the mirror?

Editorial 4 minute read 2:01 AM CST

“It’s not you, it’s me.”

It’s the time-worn rationale offered up when a relationship dissolves and one partner seeks to blunt the pain of the breakup by assuming responsibility. It’s more strategic than sincere, however, with the real goal being to avoid having to engage in a lengthy conversation about who’s to blame for what.

Conservative Party of Canada Leader Pierre Poilievre has endured his share of messy breakups lately; in recent months, three MPs have decided the party’s values no longer align with their own, and the way to best serve their constituents is by crossing the floor and joining the ranks of the governing Liberal Party led by Prime Minister Mark Carney.

The most recent is Edmonton Riverbend MP Matt Jeneroux, who last November announced he intended to resign his parliamentary seat this spring. Having clearly had a change of heart, he announced on Feb. 18 he would instead join Carney’s Liberals, having been impressed by the PM’s much-lauded speech at the World Economic Forum and concerned by the growing wave of separatist sentiment in Alberta and Quebec.

Read
2:01 AM CST

More Opinion

Don’t feel chained to fellow dominant type

Maureen Scurfield 4 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CST

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: On Valentine’s Day, I got a beautiful silver chain from my boyfriend. The problem is I feel it’s too much of a statement to everyone since we are so new to each other as a couple.

Also, the truth is I’m not super serious about him.

Should I just give the necklace back? This guy has a strong personality and will tell me to get lost if I do.

I don’t really want to break up yet, as he’s so sexy and funny. I just want to wait for when the time is right for me.

In search of a better way to build Manitoba

Ron Hambley, Chris Lorenc and Shawn Wood 5 minute read Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2026

Manitoba was built through hard work, collaboration, and community. Every hospital, school, road, and bridge reflects the dedication of our construction industry. Today, the sector employs more than 57,000 Manitobans, contributes $4.2 billion annually to the provincial economy, and supports businesses in every region. We are proud of the role we play in building Manitoba’s future.

We are speaking out about the Manitoba Jobs Agreement (MJA) not to oppose the government’s goals, but to ensure public policy delivers real value, respects worker choice, and protects taxpayers. The practical consequences of the MJA are clear: fewer bidders, reduced competition, increased administrative burden, and higher project costs. When competition narrows, prices rise. When compliance complexity grows, risk premiums follow. All of this lands on a provincial budget already facing structural deficits.

The MJA imposes a specific labour relations structure on provincially funded projects exceeding $50 million. Successful bidders must hire union card-holding workers first if their own workforce is insufficient. Union membership becomes the deciding factor — not skill, experience, or performance. If the goal is to ensure Manitobans work on these projects, there is a simple solution: require contractors to certify that their workforce consists of Manitoba residents. A union card should not determine who is entitled to work on taxpayer-funded infrastructure. The agreement also introduces entirely new costs. All employers must pay 85 cents per hour worked to the Manitoba Building Trades Council; an unprecedented charge in Manitoba construction. On a typical school project, this payment alone can exceed $250,000, with no measurable benefit to taxpayers.

Open-shop contractors face additional costs, including compulsory union dues, numerous union fund contributions, and payments to third parties. Taken together, these requirements will add millions of dollars to publicly funded projects. It’s money that could otherwise be invested directly in classrooms, hospitals, and infrastructure.

Chris Young / The Canadian Press

Prime Minister Mark Carney announced major new defence spending last summer, but how and where that money will be spent is every bit as important as the dollars involved, Kyle Volpe Hibert argues.

Chris Young / The Canadian Press
                                Prime Minister Mark Carney announced major new defence spending last summer, but how and where that money will be spent is every bit as important as the dollars involved, Kyle Volpe Hibert argues.

Ottawa unveils its expansive rearmament plan

Kyle Volpi Hiebert 5 minute read Preview

Ottawa unveils its expansive rearmament plan

Kyle Volpi Hiebert 5 minute read Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2026

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s recent Davos speech was widely lauded for calling out how today’s global order is reverting back to the law of the jungle. He also highlighted ways Canada is helping its middle-power allies adapt to this new reality by bolstering NATO’s hard power projection. For evidence, he touted Ottawa’s “unprecedented investments in over-the-horizon radar, in submarines, in aircraft and boots on the ground, boots on the ice.”

Expect to hear far more about Canada’s military modernization in the months and years ahead.

On Feb. 17, Carney released Ottawa’s long-awaited Defence Industrial Strategy. It’s a blueprint for how the bonus $81.8 billion over five years for the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) contained in Budget 2025 will be spent. And all the enormous increases to the CAF budgets thereafter.

Carney last summer committed Canada to NATO’s elevated target of members spending five per cent of GDP on defence by 2035. If Ottawa honours that, the military’s annual budget will skyrocket to $160 billion in less than 10 years. That’s roughly five times more than the Department of National Defence’s budget estimates were in 2024-2025.

Read
Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2026

LOAD MORE OPINION ARTICLES